18

Durham was indeed as worthless as MSM made him out to be. A couple of joke prosecutions eliciting testimony nobody but us listened to, 1 piss weak conviction with no jail and a reinstated bar license, and a final report nobody but us will read telling us what we already knew 5 years ago.

I would like to repent for all of my cope in defending this investigation as not frivolous and fixed. Whether it occurred here, elsewhere, or in real life. I have failed to abide by Fren Commandment #1 “Thou shalt not cope” and I am ashamed.

Moving forward, I shalt not cope with special counsels Robert Hur or John Huber. One would have to lie to themselves on a level akin to a psychopath to pretend these clowns are doing anything except railroading our side and covering up malfeasance. I would recommend we all take a hard look in the mirror and divorce ourselves from any make believe nonsense to the contrary.

Please forgive me. I am sorry. I will work on this extensively.

51

Why are all these morons losing their mind about a stupid check mark? It seems totally pointless to care. So what if you have or don’t have one. What the hell does having one actually do for you?

162
27
36

Am I the only one bothered by this? We now have shifted from mass mail ballot fraud, machine fuckery, and other counting shenanigans to the FBI as the cause of rigged elections. Not to discount the effect of fake investigations or the covering up of legit scandals for the dems. But what happened to the main problem?

Maybe I am wrong, but normies are so out of touch with what has been going on that I cannot possibly fathom this angle will suddenly knock them out of their slumbers. To me, it is way easier to excuse govt fuckery as partisan politics than it is to excuse hundreds of thousands of dead or non existent voters casting ballots in the 2020 election. Or counterfeits. Or flipping votes.

We’ve demonstrated enough that you’d have to be a complete fool to believe this isn’t going on. But we’ve never conclusively proved this to where it cannot be “normie ‘splained away” as some baseless conspiracy or benign anomaly. And this is a big problem to me. I don’t know how to solve it. I am not in possession of every single thing I’d need to tee this up.

It’s frustrating that every single investigation is gas lit, stone walled, and then ends in a controlled opposition-like report that cannot draw strong and definitive conclusions. Only inferences of obvious fuckery. Why? Why can we not get this to the finish line??

38

By now of us have figured out that narratives from either party are usually bullshit. But for some odd reason, the issue of illegal immigration is one that people still haven’t seen for what it is. I am not really sure why that is. And people generally blame the symptoms and demand fixes for the symptoms. Which predictably won’t end the way they think it will.

We have had the identical argument on illegal immigration since the 60s. Nothing changes. We have a legal system woefully inadequate to deal with the issue. For example: there are about 630 immigration judges across the country. There is a case backlog of over 2 million and climbing. That backlog is simply not possible to clear. For longer than I’ve been alive, the system has been broken.

I have my own theories, but the purpose of this post is not to persuade you to think like I do. It is to get you to think and find the flaws in your reasoning. So I will point some things out and am looking forward to what thoughts come to your minds.

  1. We destabilize Mexico, Central & South America with government coups and other shenanigans - 1954 Guatemala; 1961 Cuba (bay of pigs); 1964 Brazil; 1965 Dominican Republic; 1970s Argentina & Chile; 1980s Nicaragua; 1983 Grenada; 1989 Panama; 2002 Venezuela (oddly Clinton got Chavez out of jail to run for president); 2009 Honduras…I could go on

  2. There is a drug trafficking business with annual revenues larger than most of the world’s largest corporations.

  3. There are massive numbers of human trafficking into the southeastern United States.

  4. GW Bush installed a known narco ally as president of Colombia in 2002.

  5. government funded NGOs drive large numbers of people to the border and advise them on how to get in

  6. government incentivizes illegal entry with birth right citizenship and subsidies for food, medical, and housing.

  7. the only regular immigration enforcement is against US business owners for employing people that shouldn’t be here. And such laws would be unnecessary if the government did their job at the border.

  8. government pays Americans to not work

  9. we don’t teach trades/skilled labor; many schools in large cities will give you a diploma with straight F’s as long as you show up at least half the time…massive student loans for meaningless degrees

  10. the most exploitive immigrant labor comes from lawful seasonal worker programs; large numbers of illegals have incomes above the median.

So with these thoughts in mind:

A) how can the border ever get sealed when there is so much money involved with leaving it open?

B) how can we disincentivize illegal entry when their home country is destabilized, chaotic, violent, and economically unsound because of US government policies/actions?

C) why do we want private business, under criminal penalty, to enforce laws that Uncle Sam outright refuses to enforce?

D) why is the focus on the illegals themselves and not the reasons/ways they are here?

E) Does deporting everyone found here illegally have any meaningful impact on the drug/human trafficking problem?

F) with the exception of the border wall (where there was one), has any enforcement action made a dent in this issue?


This isn’t an exhaustive list; just food for thought. Ask yourself if your personal beliefs on this issue are focused on root cause solutions. Am curious what you think.

62

I found it utterly befuddling the timing of his announcement. It is on the heels of a laughably bogus Trump indictment. Why would you announce today when you will get zilch for press?

Sure enough, MSM hits at him saying "Anti vaxer RFK jr announces challenge to Biden" indicating that RFK is a threat to them, not an ally. So I started thinking about why he would enter the race.

Right off the bat, you have to think that on name recognition alone, he'd start with around 30% of the dem vote. Perhaps higher. We know they don't want to run Pedo Peter because he is a liability. All the better if they do. But if they don't...who is on their bench that can beat RFK jr? It isn't Mayor Pete, Robert F. O'Rourke, or Kamala. So who do they run?

RFK can win enough delegates to carry the DNC nomination because he will clean house in red states that do not have mass mail voting. He will still get delegates in places like NY and CA. He will run away with it in the red states that they can't rig.

So what happens in the general? Who do they rig for? If they rig for RFK jr, this guy is out for blood for what they did to his dad and uncle. If they rig for Trump, he is similarly out for blood. It is a lose/lose situation for the DS. WTF are they gonna do?

Yes, this is spitballing. But right now I am thinking this makes the most sense. He can announce today and cause pandemonium in the apparatus. He doesn't need the publicity because he has name recognition. I think he'd mop the floor with anyone. And he might be the first dem I would ever vote for if some how a RINO wins the republican nomination.

Thoughts?

Now we are seeing stuff about the guy that actually isn’t a good look at all. First, it was innuendo, but now on to slightly more substantive. And Trump just hammered him over Florida’s COVID stats.

I don’t have nearly enough evidence to be confident in a conclusion, but I am leaning in favor of ole Ron being one of them not us. Of course, that could change…and I am open to being persuaded. Just not looking good for the guy at the moment.

I don’t buy that they are acting in concert. Hitting him over his COVID response is not trivial. It is the kind of thing that ends careers. MAGA is abandoning him in droves now. Not to go too far on a limb, but if there was a primary for governor right now, would Ronnie still be a sure thing to win it? I don’t know…

There is this one thought that doesn’t jive with anything I said…at least that I can figure: why did DeSantis keep jab mandates, masks, lockdowns, and other bullshit from moving forward? He was one of the first, if not the first, to open right back up. This put tremendous pressure on the COVID LARP. It made Texas Gov Abbott buck up. And those 2 states pretty much were the reason we are not still dealing with those issues. Seems like a major mistake by the DS to me if he is DS.

What say you all?

27
15

I don’t know where I fall on this issue. On the one hand, it doesn’t look like he did anything wrong except look like a doofus. On the other hand, the pics circulating of him on J6 with Alexander Soros, the Ukrainian military special needs looking guy, and Pelosi’s son in law are suspicious. As is the film crew following him around.

I remember right in the aftermath of j6, people were showing pics of him at BLM rallies. Not sure what to make of that. I don’t know if those were actually him (cant find the pics anymore sadly) or what exactly he might have been doing at a BLM rally if it was him. What would one of us be doing at a BLM rally?

Then add in the Brazilian Shaman from a few months ago and this looks pretty suspicious.

What say the rest of you?

291
25

Was talking to a friend of mine who lives in CA. He is a life long democrat. He doesn’t like what is currently happening. But any time I bring that up I get “ya but muh Drumpf!” As though Trump is just as bad or worse. I can’t begin to tell you how often this happens if I engage a friend who is a dem. Mitch McConnell isn’t winning us any favors either. Because that guy is viewed by dems as even more corrupt than we view him.

Point being that I don’t think we are going to awaken a meaningful amount of additional people at this point. Even if Pedo Peter gets us into a 3rd world war or a nuclear exchange, its hard to argue that the best result will exceed these people wanting to dump Pedo Peter for a different dem. It won’t be enough to get them to vote for Trump. And as long as not a damn thing happens when flagrantly rigging elections, how does Trump win in 2024? From where I am today, I am failing to see how “exposing” these people gets us anywhere besides a continued cornhole snaking but this time with full knowledge and awareness of who is doing it. Your buttholes will still be just as sore.

I’m not trying to doom. I am trying to be realistic. And I am pretty desperate for election fraud consequences.

23

Keep that in mind. Especially regarding the newly acknowledged “lab leak” story.

21
27

According to the chans, it has apparently been validated that Hobbs had a bunch of mortgages from sham companies. But I have not seen anything that would prove as much…only that they claim that it checks out. Still, something seems incredibly strange here.

The first thing that stinks bad to me is the whole origin of the story. It comes from a lawyer that stuck his dick in crazy, then suffered predictable consequences. Although perhaps the consequences were far more extreme than normal. It’s a really odd origin to me. Doesn’t mean its bogus, but gives me pause.

How did this story end up in the legislature? Something like this can’t really be a surprise to the members, can it? Wouldn’t you think that some of the compromised would be sure to torpedo this kind of testimony? That part stinks too.

Maybe I am off base on this, but it also seems like this is not the full story either. Like as in they have not completed investigating any of this. Why do you go public when you haven’t got all your ducks in a row? Seems like a recipe to make it harder to keep digging when they are aware of being outed. Wouldn’t surprise me if all of a sudden some kind of extra gatekeeping is quickly rolled out into the AZ public records system to keep you from being able to pull records from wherever there is an internet connection.

It seems like this story, if true, would have far bigger legs than it does. Sure, we see some twitter keywords trending. But not in numbers that you’d expect for such a story. Beyond TGP, I haven’t seen any other publications write about this story. Except for some that are questionably lower credibility than even TGP.

Are the allegations believable? Yes. But its still a pretty big leap for most, even among us here who are used to all sorts of crazy sounding stuff being true. I don’t know where I stand on this. I’m inherently skeptical of most things; this one is giving me some red flags.

What say all of you?

47

I am at a loss on this one. There are too many possible culprits to be able to narrow it down to the actual perpetrator with what we have available on the record. This is frustrating the hell out of me. Until recently, some deductive reasoning got you close enough to the truth. I am stuck here on this one. What do you all think and why? (there are no wrong answers, unless you have no supporting basis).

My possible suspects:

  1. Russia - For once, Russia might be doing something. The timing is extremely suspect. Right after the expose on Biden being to blame for blowing up Nordstream, we get a bunch of train derailments including one with extremely toxic chemicals on it. We also are at...6 train derailments with the one in western Nebraska yesterday? And the acid spill from the big rig in Arizona. We also have some manufacturing businesses going up in flames...very suspicious...It would also be very naive to think Russia is going to tolerate our continued interloping in Ukraine and simply take it on the chin. If you think that, you don't know Russians.

  2. China - One would think they would not need or want to do this because they already own enough of our politicians to get what they want. If they wanted the US strategically weakened in various respects, they probably just need to ask Pedo Peter to do it. Its like a genie in a bottle giving them infinite wishes. But the balloon thing is possibly motive enough to throw egg in the face of Pedo Peter.

  3. USA - At this point it should be obvious to anyone paying attention that false flags are the modus operandi of choice by this government. Want to go directly against the will of the people? Easy...just create a false flag event that scares the shit out of them then promise the solutions to assuage that fear. But we don't typically conduct false flags that make us look weak, inept, and retarded. Which is the case we have currently.

  4. Antifa/BLM/wtfever grievance astroturf group - Typically these instigators are put up to the task as the means to effect a false flag event sanctioned by the government. But I am not certain that the DS maintains absolute control over these groups. In fact, it is quite likely that they have neglected to check this leviathan sufficiently to keep them in line. Plus, they have to be heated about being abandoned when it is not election season. Perhaps they have gone rogue and are doing this themselves?


The fact that the regime is uninterested in dealing with this situation in Ohio might lead you to believe they caused it. Which still may be true. But I don't think this information is sufficient to lead to that conclusion. This makes them look retarded. But I don't really see an overall benefit to what they have done. At least, a benefit that is worth the negative sentiment of the people. This is not how they typically operate false flags.

Pedo Pete could have received a "bipartisan circle jerk" of accolades by immediately dispatching support to take care of those people affected, as well as clean the shit up. Normally we do not see them run from such opportunities. Yet they basically went through all the ridicule and scorn before Trump forced a response. Very uncharacteristic here.

So I have no idea what to think here. The top choices I have seem to lack anything on the record that would push any of them to a higher likelihood of being the culprit. Am very interested in all of your thoughts here.

38

Why does this seem like something that has likely occurred since Brandon’s installation and is suddenly “leaked” out of the pentagon by the same people behind the classified docs story? AKA Obama…

Sure, people start tracking it AFTER they hear about it. Zero reason you wouldn’t shoot it down unless China owns you. Now you are fully embarrassed with the public and look impotent on the world stage. It is the type of humiliation they seem completely unprepared for. If you knew it was coming and you knew people would see it and ask questions, you would be prepared with responses. This is a joke. Even normies are scratching their heads…

Maybe I am wrong. Maybe its so big and so odd looking that it couldn’t possibly be missed. I am just not convinced.

To those thinking its coms: why would they use coms that call them all into question in the eyes of the public? I have no answer for this.

13

I follow a bunch of scanner sites. This came across my screen when I was working on Tuesday. It seemed odd. So I paid a little bit of attention to it as it unfolded. It was strange.

Apparently this guy was known to law enforcement as mentally unstable (red flag #1 - they are ALWAYS known). He purchased his scary black gun at Cabela’s 4 days prior (red flags #2 & #3 - scary black gun the gun cucks want to ban and recent purchase). He also allegedly had 13 30 round mags on him (red flag #4 - muh magazine restrictions). Police responded and killed him at the scene.

What was really damn bizarre to me was that it took like 90 minutes from the time the police entered and for any news about what was going on to get out. I found a local tv station there that was on site and interviewing “witnesses” but they were utterly worthless interviews. They didn’t witness anything. The first one was walking in the store and all hell was breaking loose so she left. Fascinating…Several others had similar stories. Then they had an employee. This guy was in the back so he didn’t see anything either. Just his coworkers sprinting in all different directions.

Fortunately, the only person killed was the shooter. Nobody else was even hurt. But the entire thing is really making me want to dig.

https://www.ketv.com/article/omaha-target-witnesses-employees-shooting/42723651

https://www.ketv.com/article/omaha-police-learning-more-target-shooting-witnesses/42724252

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/employees-witnesses-describe-scene-of-shooting-at-a-target-in-west-omaha/ar-AA16XqqX?li=BBnbfcL

https://www.wowt.com/2023/02/02/omaha-target-shooting-law-enforcement-aware-suspect-had-history-mental-health-issues/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/omaha-target-shooting-suspect-bought-ar-style-rifle-4-days-earlier-pol-rcna68739

These are just some of the links you can find on this. It is extremely difficult for me to watch these videos because my ad blocker is not blocking them, and the embed is awful so I can’t speed up/slow down/rewind without skipping around. I keep looking for noteworthy or odd things in the background or what people are saying. I am coming up blank. Hoping some new eyes see something I didn’t.

Thanks in advance for your efforts!

12
10

Pretty hard to argue these companies are anything but one in the same. Not only are they at least an unlawful cartel oligopoly, but they aren’t willing to share their code to the public they serve. And the size of these contracts are beyond absurd price rape.

This started off as a random midnight rumination. But I think there is something here. Who should we lobby? Looking for suggestions.

This kind of stuff bothers me. Here is the tweet in question:

https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1617657224851230720

Here is the current AZ voter registration form: https://azsos.gov/sites/default/files/voter_registration_form_092222-standard.pdf

We can clearly see that the left side images are from 2020. With this form, we can conclusively know that the right side are voter registration forms. Not exactly this form, but almost certainly that form is modified/updated for each election cycle. It is similar enough to know what we are looking at.

The water is muddied here. This is presented in a manner that would insinuate they are from her election. But they are not. And nobody seems to be reporting this accurately. Why?

I have not seen any reporting that directly says this is from Lake's 2022 election. I also have not seen any reporting that says these are from 2020. It is as if this story is being deliberately twisted to have everyone believe they are from her election. This is not good at all. When your own team deceives you, that is not acceptable. Why would this be happening? I don't have a theory. Curious on what everyone here thinks.

24

This is a standoff that they cannot afford to lose. And it has to be this. Last night, it was said that McCarthy caved and gave them everything they wanted. But he still didn’t get to 218. In fact, by the end of the night, McCarthy detractors had grown by 3 since the first 2 votes took place. Either the story was a larp released by the swamp to attempt yet another angle of attack on the “unreasonableness” of the holdouts, or the holdouts got what they wanted and are moving the goalposts. But which is it?

What is notably missing from the media tonight? Exactly what specifically was demanded and especially what the “compromise” was, if any. We are getting some idea from various direct rep tweets. But not concrete specifics.

It is the rules committee that is the line in the sand. It just has to be. If they do not control the rules committee, they are toast. It is the rules committee that will be wielded to thwart effective investigations and oversight. One of the BIG ones would be preventing conservatives from unsealing the J6 committee records. If McCarthy gives into this demand (a reasonable one at that…one that should already be a given not a demand) he and his merry band of apparatchiks are toast. And so are the democrats.

And this is the only thing that makes sense. It is the one thing the swamp simply cannot part with. It is also the one thing that they cannot publicly defend. There is no good faith argument against what the “not so fast, kev” crowd want. Not to the republican voter base. There is no reasonable argument to be made that this is unacceptable terms. So now what?

This is what we are watching. Someone has to blink.

34
49

Is that they cannot seem to spin their inner seething that this is happening. Every single one of the shills and rats losing their minds sound unhinged even to NPCs. The media propaganda/narrative machine cannot weave anything sensible around the rage being projected. For the first time, I think they broke it.

view more: Next ›