2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

I also eat copious amounts of capsaicin and smoke cigars, but unfortunately wasn't enough to ward against the goodies that kids like to bring into the home -- in this case, pinworms.

I've been using natural remedies (honey, papaya, garlic, etc), and I have Ivermectin, so I've been taking that as well, but Ivermectin isn't as effective against parasites like hookworms and pinworms (most studies I saw showed around 50-60% effectiveness with a normal APM schedule), so I figured it's a good excuse to do a heavy bendazole regimen.

3
Anon6992374 3 points ago +3 / -0

From what I've read, fenben is extremely low-risk, which is why it's used liberally for animals with very few noted adverse reactions. I've been looking into taking it myself, but am currently debating between that and mebendazole.

I would advise reading the primary sources (e.g., https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2687140/), rather than relying on an authority (FDA) that won't approve safe, alternative cancer treatments but says ineffective, potentially harmful mRNA vaccines are perfectly fine.

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't find any consistent dosage information for mebendazole like I can for fenben. What dosage do you use?

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Maryland, DC, Virginia, North Carolina, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii.

1
Anon6992374 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump's EOs are directives for executive agencies.

He's just ordering them to stop ignoring/violating the law, as they've been doing, and to start actively enforcing the law.

1
Anon6992374 1 point ago +1 / -0

First of all, no one lost their first amendment rights over the "antisemitism" executive action. If you read the EO, you would see it was only enforcing "unlawful harassment and violence" against Jews, in response to things like teachers being trapped in their offices on university campuses by angry mobs. Nowhere in the EO did it even mention rhetoric or speech, and only actions that are already unlawful.

Secondly, this EO is solely to ensure federal enforcement of constitutional law, which is (arguably the only) the job of the federal government. When state governments are violating constitutionally-protected rights, the role of the federal government is to intervene to protect the rights of the people.

Most of Trump's EOs, so far, have been orders directing executive agencies to follow and uphold law that they were previously ignoring and/or violating.

1
Anon6992374 1 point ago +1 / -0

So accurate. 😂

1
Anon6992374 1 point ago +2 / -1

I know this will be unpopular here, and I'm certainly for deporting illegal aliens, but this is absolutely 1A protected speech, just as is flashing your headlights to oncoming traffic to let them know there's a cop hiding waiting around the corner.

I'm fully aware they are using it to help people break the law, and not because they have journalistic integrity, but reporting information about law enforcement activity is exactly what a free press should be doing. If someone is leaking confidential information, there are laws in place to prosecute them. If there is direct interference with an investigation, there are laws in place to prosecute the offenders.

When cheering on authoritative power to enforce things you like, remember that given enough time, the pendulum WILL swing the other direction, and that same power can and will be used for things you don't like.

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was he also pressured into funding illegal ballot harvesting operations in 2020?

I doubt it.

1
Anon6992374 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one seems to be talking about it, but I'm sure this has little to do with wanting to add another state or to protect Greenland, and is almost certainly about "natural resources."

1
Anon6992374 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you may benefit from re-reading the post.

1
Anon6992374 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sadly, there are a significant amount of people (always anti-Trump from what I've seen) who, against all logic, are convinced that it was all staged by Trump to help him in the polls.

3
Anon6992374 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah, wasn't aware that it was contested. Will have to look into that again.

Do we know if he has called since then? Not really his MO to not reach out in a scenario like that, so I was surprised to see her say that she hadn't heard from him yet.

5
Anon6992374 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm inclined to believe #1.

Additionally, anyone willing to kill an innocent person for a political stunt, or any "greater good" cause, regardless of what that cause is, is no ally of mine.

3
Anon6992374 3 points ago +3 / -0

The fingerprint seems far more problematic than name, dob and ssn, in my opinion.

What is a BCC? I am intimately familiar with the immigration process (or was, at least), and have never heard of a Border Crossing Card -- is this new?

Also, I like how, specifically, a Mexican passport number is offered as an alternative. Not just any passport number. One from Mexico.

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't believe the event is without conspiracy, of course. There were too many provably wrong reports coming out of the media to count, including NYT initially reporting two shooters, and that the second was taken into custody.

But I just don't see any evidence that Trump would have been in on it, other than the outcome has benefitted him. It does seem rather apparent that the SS were in on it, however.

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

Appreciate the response.

I think #3 doesn't make sense for a staged event to which Trump is party, because what exactly would he need "cover" from? He was either hired by, framed by, or coaxed into it by Trump's people (under this belief). Registering republican would only give fuel to the left, which doesn't really aid Trump at all.

#6 Also doesn't really add up from a "Trump planned it himself" belief, because based on the public statements of the Biden admin (which was much before the interview), their position would clearly not be to refuse to offer condolences to the victim's family. This again, does not favor Trump.

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm with you on most, but on #6, he was seen golfing at 9am the following day, which to my knowledge, was before the widow was interviewed. Perhaps she was just interviewed before he had a chance, and has since called? Anyone have any updated info on this?

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn't. But a person who believes it was staged, might be. People tend to get banned here for debating MAGA or Q, even respectfully.

From the General Rules:

Patriots.win / Q Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, this train still has no brakes.)

And to be clear, I'm not criticizing the rule, even if I may disagree with it. The only rules I would ever criticize are those that aren't transparent.

-3
Anon6992374 -3 points ago +1 / -4

That's a fair point, but even if it's a small percentage, it is unfortunate to see so little discrimination being used. I've seen a couple now that were examples of such folks, but the trend seems to be leaning towards no line between making a distasteful joke and actually supporting a violent act.

As I've stated, it should always be called out, but unless they are public employees, going after their jobs before they have chance to apologize for a comment like "oh, so close :p" is not the way to move forward the awakening.

-2
Anon6992374 -2 points ago +1 / -3

The left would do it to you in a hearbeat.

I fully agree. Which is why a better example should be set when the goal is to AWAKEN the sleeping masses to something better than the status quo.

Turnabout is fair play

It is also a losing play. This only serves to hasten and widen the pendulum swing, rather than work to bring balance and unity to a divided nation.

People inherently recognize goodness, each to their own degree of development. For the majority (i.e., unthinking people), they will not see a difference between the Left's cancel culture, and the Right's -- even if it's true that supporting J6 and supporting an assassination attempt are in NO WAY equivalent.

We need to be thinking outside of the box and not quickly using the cudgel as soon as its our turn to wield it.

view more: Next ›