3
AussieSpectator 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah xD he should have looked right then he'd see the thousands of people staring at him hwahaha

25
AussieSpectator 25 points ago +25 / -0

There is no sleight of hand here lol

-checks votes on ballots -flips through until he gets to a vote that's not for his candidate -picks up votes for his candidate in left hand -picks up votes for other candidate in right hand -places right hand ballots on table -stacks the left hand ballots into a nice neat stack -feed right hand ballots back into the machine

-proceeds to act natural while his hearts bpm goes wild lmfao

1
AussieSpectator 1 point ago +1 / -0

^This guy popcorns^

1
AussieSpectator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well I actually have half a dozen takes on it because I don't know, you have one take on it.

2
AussieSpectator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps they didn't know who he was and found it odd that this big guy was rushing towards general flynn without general flynns acknowledgement.

You're assuming YOU know who he is and what he is and project that rationale onto the security guards. When a day later they sit down for a wholesome 2 hour interview that literally ends with the quote by general flynn "I love this guy" "Alex is a great patriot" xD

Let's not forget trump telling Alex "I will not let you down, you will be very very impressed, i hope"

6
AussieSpectator 6 points ago +6 / -0

What about when general flynn said he "LOVES" alex and that he is a "TRUE PATRIOT". You guys need to step up your content consuming game and stop using telegram lol.

2
AussieSpectator 2 points ago +2 / -0

A true warrior dives into the depths of hell itself sword in hand to acquire knowledge that might help him slay the devil.

3
AussieSpectator 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's because they saw Q say "AJ moss backed" ect.

But what they overlook is the fact that Alex himself doesn't have to be a willing party in being simply moss backed. And in certain wargames MOSS "backing" threats to them is actually an effective strategy that gives them control over aspects surrounding his day to day life that he's unable to totally be aware of if at all. If this is the case he actually requires our help and our dismissal of him entirely is serving the purpose of our enemies.

Requires discussion but no one will have it. Perhaps it was MOSS itself that planted the seed that the few Q posts regarding Alex have been understood in totality and that Alex should be banished and shunned upon by this community.

2
AussieSpectator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good luck breaking through the Q/Alex hive mind theory on here, it's a good theory sure but the evidence is lacking and many more unexplored theories hold much stronger bearings to reality.

AJ din du nufin

2
AussieSpectator 2 points ago +2 / -0

You realize "Alex Jones is legit" and "Alex Jones is 100% controlled opposition" aren't actually conflicting statements right?

2
AussieSpectator 2 points ago +2 / -0

They literally turned the frogs gay though, in fact trans.

The situations you use are consequences of actions actions taken by youtube algorithms and mainstream media ect.

Let me guess a doctor saying calmly and explaining how and why "they are turning the frogs gay" would be much better than a "raving lunatic that only 5% of people can understand".

Well in the same show he had someone do that, Alex also did it himself, and yet all most people(probably 95%) have seen is a few minute clip of "TURNING THE FREAKIN FROGS GHEY" and some memes.
(presentation = 2 hours, scientific explanation) (pop culture understanding = 6 WORDS)

I witnessed the era when youtube erased and manipulated all alex jones search results. Unless you have proof that divide between "people who listen to him fully in context" and "people who can't discern the rhetoric from micro clips and memes" is intentional by Alex Jones himself, by colluding with search algorithms manipulated by ""you know who"", then what you claim is collusion is in fact a successful attack by ""you know who"" against Alex in an attempt to create an elaborate, great but ultimately unsubstantiated theory about Alex Jones being controlled opposition there for destroying his credibility amongst this community.

Under your logic essentially anyone who fights for the community that has been "othered" by ""you know who"" is controlled opposition, because you can't discern what errors are intentional or not, because all you would need to do is simply censor them, take them out of context, and not let them respond.

1
AussieSpectator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Precedent set, bye bye independent raw media.

4
AussieSpectator 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ask and you shall receive, the final act, the post number itself. https://files.catbox.moe/7pifvc.png

1
AussieSpectator 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I sure hope your viewers can make that distinction"

We'll yeah easily because they saw the whole clip lmfao

1
AussieSpectator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q did tell you what it is. It's BIG.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›