posted ago by VaccinesCauseSIDS ago by VaccinesCauseSIDS +283 / -0

im not really sure what is going on in this video. the reddit comments try to explain,

but I'm still having a hard time re-constructing his sleight-of-hand in my mind.

supposedly, he takes already-counted ballots from the upper tray

you can see he seems to be counting them,

or maybe verifying the ballots had the correct vote for his candidate?

he seems to be a bit slow for just ordinary counting. maybe its because he has to do a little bit more thinking?

so anyway, he walks over to the table, with something in each hand.

the papers in his left hand, do not appear to be the same as the papers in his right hand.

at the last moment before putting his right hand down, he turns the paper 90 degrees, which is a common way to keep papers organized in a stack.

he then picks up the stack, and walks over and feeds it into the counting machine again?

but then, compare the stack on the table, before and after.

even though he appears to be picking up a stack of paper, there is still a stack of paper on the table when he walks away.

im not sure what this guy is doing, tbh.

not saying he is stuffing ballots,

but then again, i don't really understand his actions either.

maybe if we had more footage, of him, and other workers, and we can see if this is somehow a SOP standard operating procedure that we simply haven't been properly trained on.

what do you see?

what do you think?



Comments (44)
sorted by:
Jammyjams 37 points ago +37 / -0

Can't wait for these pieces of shit to face justice.

We are living in a borderline banana republic with kangaroo courts. Look at what happened to Alex Jones. Hate him or love him, that was the biggest joke of a trial I have ever seen.

LightsOn45 36 points ago +36 / -0

The penalty for subverting an election should be death. If you change, delete a valid vote, or add a single fake vote KNOWINGLY, you hang. Fuck around time is over.

StormDES 5 points ago +5 / -0

Should be both Arms and legs cut off!

Quantachyon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then most of them get the freebies they want... Nah. Traitors should hang.

SNRNXS 12 points ago +12 / -0

Borderline? We are one, and the banana has spoiled

Gitmo-or-Bust 5 points ago +5 / -0

He is controlled opposition and this was a ‘show trial’. The message is that you do not challenge the organized mass shooting events designed to confiscate your weapons……or you will be sued for $50M.!

Gelicki88 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed about Alex Jones but I am surprised these stage actor Sandy Hook parents stayed in character so long

SeeAreJay 2 points ago +2 / -0

The judge was a literal purple hair covid karen lgbtq++123+wtf

AussieSpectator 25 points ago +25 / -0

There is no sleight of hand here lol

-checks votes on ballots -flips through until he gets to a vote that's not for his candidate -picks up votes for his candidate in left hand -picks up votes for other candidate in right hand -places right hand ballots on table -stacks the left hand ballots into a nice neat stack -feed right hand ballots back into the machine

-proceeds to act natural while his hearts bpm goes wild lmfao

lsvogel 16 points ago +16 / -0

See how he looks to his left when he's at the machine to see if anyone is watching?


AussieSpectator 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah xD he should have looked right then he'd see the thousands of people staring at him hwahaha

ilovetrump4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another dumb criminal

americruiser1111 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is exactly what I saw. Watched it 3 times to make sure.

normalstreet 18 points ago +18 / -0

Check out how he looks at what appears to be a supervisor or observer at the 0:13 second mark. That's the involuntary behavior of someone doing something wrong.

jhartz39 16 points ago +16 / -0

Yes, he ran the same ballots twice. Cheating bastard.

VERITASAEQUITAS 15 points ago +15 / -0

Watch very closely, the papers that he puts into the machine are the exact same papers he took out.

Dontstopbelieving 12 points ago +12 / -0

The machines should be set up like atms or vending machines. Mount them in a wall so one person feeds the in and someone on the other side retrieves them. At no time should counted and uncounted ballots be in the same area.

James_Wilson 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yeah he left some on the table, but re-ran some others. Did you notice the "look to see if anyone was watching" over his shoulder look?

At least he bent over at the end, cause for him it should be BOHICA!

VaccinesCauseSIDS [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0


lsvogel 7 points ago +7 / -0

Send this to Gregg Phillips or Jovan Pulitzer! They'll get it to the right people!

Hope70 7 points ago +7 / -0

Definitely looks like he walked over a pile of ballots, put them on top of the pile on the left, picked the same ones up and rescanned them. He knew he was on camera so he tried to appear nonchalant re. the entire process.

VaccinesCauseSIDS [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

what we really need, are those people who watch security cameras for shoplifters. they have seen enough of it.

Duh_Winning 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or some elite level casino camera watchers.

CoolAsACucumber 6 points ago +6 / -0

Backup Video Link:


Try out private messaging apps like Session and Signal and talk to your friends and family about getting them as well so your conversations can remain private.


pepperonishoes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the link.

DJT4MoreYears 5 points ago +5 / -0

First of all...all of the ballot that get 'scanned' are supposed to drop into a steal sealed cage or box...I've seen other places that have this type of security.

This is specially for the purpose of PREVENTING ANYONE FROM RE-SCANNING THE SAME BALLOTS MORE THAN ONCE. This entire setup is rife with fraud.

The 'chain of custody' has been broken completely.

axrevolutionai 5 points ago +5 / -0

Remember guys, this is happening during primaries

November they're going to go further than they ever have..be ready for it

Kelcius 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's why I volunteered to be a pole observer and we need to mobilize eyes and hopefully they have lawyers cuz they are going to cheat and we know they know we know they're going to cheat their lives are on the line literally

ilovetrump4 3 points ago +3 / -0

Apparently, the machines aren't coded to reject ballots that are run through more than once.

Every ballot SHOULD each have a unique identifier/code.

THIS - the ability to rerun and double-count ballots - should be something that is investigated and rectified.

Entrenched 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okay I see it! Faggot assumes the position he loves

CokeOrPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not hard to see, he’s re running the same ballots

dec3169 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the ones he left on the table are probably for the candidate he is cheating against.

Apple-Bag 3 points ago +3 / -0

cheater cheater penis eater

wQkeAF 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cross-posting what u/penisse shared recently for visibility, because it could possibly be related


milgal 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the comments is a request for the Original link It was posted July 16th

wQkeAF 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for that follow up!

I wonder, then, what her Truth post was referring to

milgal 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good question. I couldn't spot anything from around that time. Ghosting bombshells seems to be the norm anymore.

ilovetrump4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Apparently, the machines aren't coded to reject ballots that are run through more than once.

Every ballot SHOULD each have a unique identifier/code.

THIS - the ability to rerun and double-count ballots - should be something that is investigated and rectified.

Patriot210 2 points ago +2 / -0

Literally just thinking this as I read it, seems like such an easy fail safe. Error ballot x has been scanned and successfully counted already

ilovetrump4 1 point ago +1 / -0


If it's allowed, it might be another of those "interesting" "features" (like fractional vote calculation) that help "count" the vote to whatever result is desired.

Nornagest 2 points ago +2 / -0

i dont want defend him, but if machine cant read one of ballots he must put that ballot out of stack, reset counter on machine and send them through machine again. Anyway, if he dont reset previous stack count, its cheating. Hard to say from video if he do that or not.

FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ok it looks like he is counting them precisely. He counts out 4, then puts the 4th one facedown on the table.

It definitely looks like the other 3 go back into the bottom tray.

Playing devil's advocate, is it possible the machine told him the "last 3" didn't scan properly, so the procedure is to put them back into the tray? Still sus tho.

Entrenched 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can’t see video

AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't remember if this came from Mellissa Carone or maybe it came from the AZ audit team...but my recollection of this is when there is a problem ballot - adjudication, jam, etc - it has to be removed and then the stack gets re-scanned. Typically with the problem ballot(s) on top. Come to think of it, I think it was Carone that said this: you are supposed to delete whatever was in progress before the issue, and scan the stack again. I remember her saying that batch counts should never exceed 50. It should always restart at 0. But she saw batches that were in the hundreds. Because they didn't erase what they already scanned when something went awry.

Quantachyon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure does look like he re ran the 6 ballots again.

Also, the chick in back seems not to have to hit a button to process hers.

I think he is mixing in a set he likes with supposed rerun batch... That is why the key is hit to process his.

VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Traitors.... Come out to playay. Traitors....Come out to playayyy. Clinking of two bottles in the backgroud.