1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many viruses can lay dormant in the human body.

Herpes 1 & 2 Shingles HPV Hepatitis B & C Epstein-Barr Virus HIV

The Covid shot has been rumored to contain many components of viral diseases including HIV.

While there appears to be no data to indicate Hantavirus can lay dormant within a body, the Covid shot is known to render the vaccinated either partially or largely immuno compromised. The severity of compromise directly correlates to booster uptake.

The Covid shot and it's MRNA delivery method exploits a natural and beneficial specialized antibody within the human body called IgG4. Without getting into the weeds explaining the function of this antibody in depth, in short, it identifies benign foreign and environmental antigens that have entered the body and signals to the rest of your immune system to ignore these benign antigens since they are harmless therefore no need to expend precious resources destroying or ejecting the foreign antigen.

Think polen, peanut allergies etc.

Most humans develop a tolerance to these environmental antigens after initial exposure. Upon initial exposure the immune system kicks off a severe inflammatory response in order to slow, eject and destroy the antigen.

Think mucus, sneezing, watery eyes, congestion etc.

These are all symptoms of a body's natural immune response to what it perceives as a foreign invader. It's the body's attempt at slowing the progression of the antigen in an effort to give the immune system time build a defense and counteroffensive to ultimately destroy the pathogen.

While this reaction is good in the face of a harmful antigen, it causes the body to expend precious resources and causes havoc on the human. And subsequent inflammation can cause harm to the body. If the pathogen is a real threat, than inflammation, while harmful, is less detrimental to the body than allowing a harmful pathogen free reign given the pathogens more harmful affect on the body.

In the case of polen, the polen would never be noticed if it weren't for your body's immune system identification and inflammatory response against it. As a result, the IgG4 antibody is tasked to identify harmless pathogens and label them "safe" so that the immune system doesn't identify it in the future and and mount a reaction.

To those that aren't affected by polen, it is not that polen doesn't enter their body or that polen is not a pathogen. But that the body, upon initial contact with that pathogen, activated the IgG4 antibody and labeled that pathogen as harmless so that the body ignores it in the future. Because polen is harmless to the human biology.

Back to the Covid shot.

Because MRNA technology instructs the human body to produce the spike protein, despite the spike protein being harmful, since the human body created the spike protein, the IgG4 identifies and labels the spike protein as "safe" and harmless therefore the immune system ignores it in the future. Does not mount a response and does not clear or destroy it at all.

As a result the human immune system becomes compromised and is more susceptible to future disease and inflammation further destroying organs.

As the immune system degrades, it not only can not fight off new diseases well or at all,

So can the covid shot cause a virus?

Not directly.

But it can render the immune system incapable of keeping previously dormant diseases dormant therefore allowing disease expression, it can compromise and weaken the immune system so that it cannot fight off newly introduced pathogens and if the vaccine ingredients contained components of other diseases in order to be developed, one can begin to see where the "safe" designation can also be given to attributes and components of common harmful diseases that it encounters in the wild.

Polen is not harmful. HIV IS harmful.

If Covid shot contains components of HIV for development and production and the human body identifies, via IgG4 mechanism, HIV as a non threat since the MRNA instructed the human immune system to build.......

HIV will be treated like polen in the human body since it has been labeled as "safe".

Harmful diseases can and will be labeled as "safe". In fact. Since no immune response is ever triggered, some people may never notice damage inflicted until it's too late.

So can the Covid shot cause a virus?

No.

But it can reverse much of the progress and refinement human natural immunity has accumulated over hundreds of years passed on from generation to generation. As a result previous natural immunity can be erased and previously "eradicated" viruses will begin to become prevalent once again.

1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Discernment is only a benefit when first you have a grounding in Truth by which to make any distinction.

Until then, ground your arguments in logic and based on evidence (not necessarily on internet pictures) then the discernment will come to you.

I am confident this conversation helped you in that endeavor.

Reach out to me whenever you find yourself confused and unable to discern internet from the Word in the future and I'll jump in. I'm always willing to help.

Tootaloo!

1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. I will continue to mold my standards in the image of my standard bearer, Jesus Christ, the Word, my Creator.

I encourage you to do the same.

P. S.

I'm confident, when you do, you'll find that you won't have to run from questions asked and instead be armed with everything you need to push through any illogical and confusing thoughts you may have.

Oh. And stay away from picture books and don't beleive everything you see on the internet. If Jesus is who you're looking for, just read the Good Book. Everything you'll ever need is right there. That way you don't have to argue with people about articles of clothing and instead focus on His message.

Best of luck.

1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

A red scarlet robe is not the same as white robe with a red sash.

But we've already covered that.

As previously mentioned. We wouldn't be denying our eyeballs since scripture does not contain images let alone color images.

We would have to rely on the Word within scripture.

Which should be a simple task since it's apparent that you pride yourself with reading the entire bible.

Seeing as though you are relying on illogical arguments, by extension deception, in order to prove a point, is it I who is at risk of following an anti-Christ or do you, yourself, run a greater risk of following the father of all lies?

John 8:44

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you find a reference to Jesus wearing a white robe and red sash within your reading?

Or is that why you relied on a modern day internet search of Jesus wearing a white robe and red sash in order to "prove" your point?

With regard to your question: why would it matter whether or not I have read the entire bible?

My having read the complete bible or lack thereof would still not prove your point.

Your line of questioning seems illogical at best. At-least with respect to the context of this conversation.

Besides. What good does it do to have read the complete bible, as you claim, if one does not implement a core, universal and always existent truth taught within?

Logic

Since logic is rooted in Logos and referenced hundreds of times within the bible.

And of course, when referenced, it is speaking of your creator. A core attribute of our creator since a creator of all cannnot be illogical. Since the I Am, the uncreated creator, is the root of logic, being that you have read the entire bible, how is it that you have missed this very basic and fundamental truth?

Proverbs 16:18

"Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall."

2
BUTERBALZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

You began with searching the internet for random photos of Jesus being depicted in a white robe with red sash and now you're equating a scarlet robe to a white robe and red sash.

Bad taste? Maybe.

But you lost me when you searched the internet for images of Jesus wearing a white robe and red sash then proceeded to drop the link in your post to prove your point.

You do realize the bible is not a picture book right?

5
BUTERBALZ 5 points ago +5 / -0

You posted search results of artists etc. Depicting Jesus wearing a red sash.

The creator of the video is asking where SCRIPTURE has ever depicted Jesus wearing a white robe and red sash.

I have news for you. You will find all kinds of imagery of Jesus being depicted in all kinds of ways. Including desgusting imagery posted from those that hate Christianity.

Finding imagery on the internet of Jesus wearing a white robe and red sash doesn't make it any more factual than the depictions of Jesus in disgusting imagery posted by others.

1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think I'll keep that moniker as a trophy.

BoomerBalz. I like the way it rolls off your tongue.

1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here. While you were deep in slumber. I took the time to write you a little love poem.

An ode to your valiant and ultimately fruitless attempt at logic.

It is called...

"My Chalice Runneth Over"

A bitter vintage, clear and cold, I catch within this cup of gold. Each salty drop a fallen pride, From those who broke against the tide.

I raise the chalice to the light, To toast the ending of their fight. No wine could ever taste as sweet, As liquid proof of their defeat.

The rim is stained with silent fear, Each shimmering and crystal tear. I drink their sorrow, deep and slow, And watch my own dominion grow.

2
BUTERBALZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Just to get rid of All of them in the region."

HOW?!

They will nuke you if you try!!

What?! You think life is like knocking on people's door like...

(Knock knock) "I'm here to collect your nuke. Yup! I'm sorry but you've been noddy! I know. I know you don't like it when I take your nuke away. But I warned you last time you chanted "death to America" we would take it away. So. Go on! Put your nuke in my baggy. Good. I was hoping YOU Wouldn't LAUNCH YOUR NUKE AT MY COUNTRY AND IN RETURN I WOULD HAVE TO LAUNCH M....."

Again.

Na.

You're still retarded.

Ps. That "Boomer" shit doesn't work on me. I could give two fucks what young, petulant, inexperienced, silver spoon fed, never faced hard times because "boomers" like me paved the way, chumps think about me.

Figure out how to change a tire or something before you come around here calling people boomers. That's if you don't self combust at the hint of sunlight hitting your skin.

Damn basement dwellers.

2
BUTERBALZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Once again you prove my point.

Your obsession is showing. And as such you're blinded.

You don't get it despite it being explained to you.

No matter how much you bitch and moan about your obsession you are limited to simply bitching and whining because the people you're obsessed about HAVE NUKES!

So you propose a solution to one problem of nukes, to allow another despot to have nukes!

Holy chet Robbin!

Again. Reddit. Go back.

At least there you'll be with others who spout out at the mouth while you stroke each other off.

2
BUTERBALZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's precisely the point you utter moron!

Again. You mental midget! You can't seem to understand!

Once you have a nuke you're locked in.

Hence why another despot should not be allowed to and can not be allowed to have one.

Because once you have a nuke you can hold the entire globe hostage to your evil existence and not a damn thing anyone can do about it.

Since when has ANY country voluntarily given up their nukes?

Never!

Because once you have one you can send everyone to go fuck themselves.

"Do you think Israel should give the nukes and even they're whole nuclear program up too?"

And I bet you thought that was a clever question to ask.

Fuck man. Get some sense and realize when you should just sit back and learn.

4
BUTERBALZ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not sure what you think they mean when they broadcast "death to America". Or what about when they fund networks who plant IED's that kill our soldiers. Or even train them.

See the problem with people like you is that you have no clue of the nature of evil and continue to blame a people for evil.

I'm not a fan of them either but also not trapped by an obsession that clouds the mind to the root of the problem.

Ya'll are blinded by your obsession.

It's fucking weird.

Like a fucking broken record ya'll can't help yourself. You just skip along and blame the same people over and over but never ever really nail it do you?

At every turn as despots around the world are taken out, you weirdos still can't fucking see it can you?

Instead you all spout out of the mouth shit like "he's helping them!" Or "see he's controlled by them!" All while you see despots taken out.

Do us all a favor and crawl back into reddit, eat your hot pockets and relegate yourself to a class of mental midgets that have existed for ages.

Better men than you, as always, will beat back the root of the issue as has always been the case throughout history.

Holy shit ya'll are pitiful.

5
BUTERBALZ 5 points ago +5 / -0

Except for the fact that they've done this for the past 20 years.

There are no "what if's".

They've already played that game.

The only thing left for them to do was load it on a delivery vehicle.

6
BUTERBALZ 6 points ago +6 / -0

Said nothing about NOT enriching uranium but simply that they would not stockpile it after enriching.

Oman wants us to believe that Iran will be allowed to enrich uranium and in the process perfect their trade and become efficient at enrichment but is not going to hide some away.

And what if they decide they won't allow inspectors in one day? The world negotiates with them for a couple of years trying gain access meanwhile they are making nuclear bombs.

And once they have one single bomb they would have no reason to ever negotiate since they would use that bomb as a deterrent against any future military action against them to rid them of any weapons.

No thanks Oman and CBS News for your utter idiocy pretending, on air, this is any kind of path forward.

2
BUTERBALZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

You give this board a bad name.

7
BUTERBALZ 7 points ago +7 / -0

You weaponize all the free phones they were given against them.

They have been tracked the entire Biden years until now.

1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I have a direct line to God through Him."

As do I.

Having a reverence to the Saints and Virgin Mary doesn't mean we do not pray to The Lord.

Having a misconception, and continued repetition of, only furthers ones own personal bias.

Listen.

All differences aside.

Why, in the garden, did Eve initially have no name?

Why was she simply referred to as "Woman"?

It is only after She committed original sin that she was referred to as "Eve". It is only then that she was 'of this world'.

A sin that, by all accounts, thrust humanity into the darkness that is 'sin'.

So it was by Woman that all was "Good" and by 'Eve' that came to be sin and as a result of Her disobedience did humanity suffer sin.

Yet by "Woman", through her womb came the fruit, The Christ, who atoned for all humanities sins.

What am I getting at?

Well. Here.

What did Jesus respond to Mary at the wedding when She commented to Jesus that there was no more wine?

John 2:3-4

"And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.

Jesus saith unto her, WOMAN, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come."

Who would call their mother "Woman"?

Furthermore.

When Jesus, at his crucifixion, sees his mother at the foot of his cross. What does he say?

John 19:26-27

"When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, WOMAN, behold thy SON!

Then saith he to the disciple, BEHOLD thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home"

You see. It was Woman who was 'Good' at the garden and only after sin was She 'Eve' but centuries later it was by 'Womans' womb that the Great Redeemer of humanity came to be. And by His Sacrifice was it possible for Woman (therefore humanity) to be Good again.

So it was Eve who thrust humanity into darkness and it was Woman who brought humanity out of darkness.

God allowed Woman, who was tainted in the garden, to be the vessel upon which The Savior would come through and wash away all sins.

(Don't miss understand my words. I am very precise with them for a reason. I AM NOT placing Mary above or at the same or even close to the level of The Lord.)

By extension it was Mary who was Woman in the Garden.

Look. You may not revere Mary. And I'm not even trying to convince you otherwise.

But Mary wasn't just a nobody.

1
BUTERBALZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh.

I say a heck of a lot more than 3 Hail Marys.

Did you know that in the Hail Mary it says "pray FOR US sinners now and at the hour of our death"?

NOT "we pray to you now and in the hour of our death".

Similar to how you ask a friend to pray for you.

The difference is She was chosen by God to birth the Christ and Savior to all of humanity.

Friends however, their just sinners like you and I.

You see. There is value in asking those not blinded or hindered by sin for their help and intercession.

By definition they are closer to God than you, I and or our friends and family.

Their prayers are not tainted by sin. Not clouded by desires of the flesh. The flesh that hinders and separates us from God.

But instead you mock and yet not once, not a single time, have I ever questioned my Catholic fath based on anything a non Catholic has ever been able to tell me.

Not once.

view more: Next ›