1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like it just got created today. Getting a lot of activity from Gab since it's promoted over there.

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder if New Orleans is going to get fucked again... and know that they now have vax passports if they'll start setting up "unvaccinated camps" for people who lose homes. Or fuck them over in some way.

38
Cheesemaker 38 points ago +38 / -0

I get inspired every time I see something like what you're doing. You may not see the impact directly, but it DOES inspire people.

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

It could also be the Democrats. I'm not sure Abbott has the balls to do that.

Abbott is certainly not the only one that wants to ensure West doesn't become Governor.

1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're looking to prosecute people for faking it. I fully expect them to come down hard on people. I wouldn't be surprised if the USG or local governments start sharing the info with employers to help verify, which will call into question how you got approved.

Plus when you fake it, all your doing it helping support the tyranny to someone else that doesn't or can't fake it.

11
Cheesemaker 11 points ago +11 / -0

Looks like postings have already doubled pretty much today. Hope it takes off.

4
Cheesemaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean its there in your name. They should instead contract out to Commie Lock & Key.

by Quelle
7
Cheesemaker 7 points ago +7 / -0

Unfortunately Abbott is half assing it as always. Only applies to government entities.

7
Cheesemaker 7 points ago +7 / -0

Businesses can require it, but aren't forced to in Texas. If the business is doing it, go somewhere else - don't give them your money.

In fact Dallas tried to defy the order recently and ordered Dallas county to have a mask mandate. It got struck down by the Texas Supreme Court.

1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm getting them off and on. Same for other .win sites. Likely a DDOS or just some technical difficulty. GA Mods probably don't know (Doggos from patriots.win does a lot of the technical work for the website).

1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. It means they fall into the "fully vaccinated" category. The one-shot data only applies to Moderna/Pfizer.

9
Cheesemaker 9 points ago +9 / -0

I mean, just pick pretty much any State and search "vaccination rate". The one-shot administered is usually about 10% higher than the fully vaccinated.

You can type in "Texas vaccination rate" into google and they actually have a good graph (which could be some fake data, but it shows this phenomenon)

Lets take the US numbers from google. On Aug 8 the number is 59.4% (one-shot) and 50.7% (fully vaccinated). If those one-shot numbers were getting vaccinated you SHOULD see the number in two weeks (Aug 22) jump by 8.7% (59.4-50.7).

Instead, on Aug 22, the US number is 52.1% (a jump of 1.4%). This would equate to 84% people who are displayed as having one shot NOT getting the second shot over the next two week period.

10
Cheesemaker 10 points ago +10 / -0

I find it interesting that if you look at the vaccination rate data most places have the "one shot administered" percentage and "fully vaccinated" percentage. The one shot administered is usually about 10% of the population (and never really goes down despite total vaccinations leveling off).

It's either a lot of people getting one shot and realizing their mistake... or them fudging the numbers to create an illusion that suddenly another 10% of the population is getting the vaccine... or both.

by Restore
20
Cheesemaker 20 points ago +20 / -0

To add to my comment on refusing for narcotics, I looked it up and it apparently varies quite a bit by state:

Prohibiting or Limiting Refusals

Existing State Laws and Policies:
    Eight states—CA, IL, ME, MA, NV, NJ, WA, WI—explicitly require pharmacists or pharmacies to provide medication to patients.
    In seven states—AL, DE, NY, NC, OR, PA, TX—pharmacy boards have issued policy statements that allow refusals but prohibit pharmacists from obstructing patient access to medication.

Permitting Refusals

Existing State Laws and Policies: Six states—AZ, AR, GA, ID, MS, and SD—have laws or regulations that specifically allow pharmacies or pharmacists to refuse for religious or moral reasons without critical protections for patients, such as requirements to refer or transfer prescriptions.

Source: https://nwlc.org/resources/pharmacy-refusals-101/ (a legal website aiming to combat pharmacists for refusing contraception - but has good information on this topic)

by Restore
10
Cheesemaker 10 points ago +10 / -0

They can refuse addicting prescriptions if they sense drug seeking behavior. But for non-addicting/non-narcotics, i don't think they can.

1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the FDA is basing the decision on test data!!!

that will be delivered to them in 2025 (i'm not even joking). (page 6 of https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download )

1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is out of Hong Kong (which is fully under China's control now). I have a hard time believing it. In fact, it's probably being put out their to give people an excuse to say why its not a real concern.

7
Cheesemaker 7 points ago +7 / -0

Israel having their highest death rates now as well.

I don't know if that is because ADE is kicking in and increasing death rates in vaccinated populations or if its Israel fudging the numbers to force a third shot. Either way, their narrative is bogus.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›