I homeschool. I am lucky because I am capable of doing so, have a home environment conducive to doing so, and I have a child who is okay with working alone.
Homeschool is not an option for most people. I have many friends in the homeschool community who tried and failed for one reason or another.
The school system is a hot mess. We parents need to wrest control from the government and reinvent the system into something where there are options that work for every family.
For example, maybe we can develop a pod system, where kids with similar learning styles can be grouped into maybe 5 - 10 kids, so they aren't alone and can have the curriculum and teaching style tailored to their needs.
Thank you! :)
Research indicates that bipolar disorder and schizophrenia are both caused by a parasite. Which disease you get depends on which part of the brain the parasite makes its nest: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/308233.php
This article only addresses schizophrenia, but it gives all you need to know about the parasite's ability to damage the brain. There are many ways to contract it, and Interestingly, it is passed via sperm. 50% of an infected man's offspring will be born with it (hence hereditary mental illness): http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/03/how-your-cat-is-making-you-crazy/308873/
Here in California, we parents are fighting for that, but thanks to vote rigging bringing in a super majority of legislators who are determined to legalize pedophelia and make our schools grooming grounds, it's an uphill battle.
Even though it looks bleak, I have cloaked myself in the armor of God and constantly tell myself that we already know that in the end, God wins. I try to encourage fellow parent warriors with that message, too.
in California, AB-1955 went into effect starting January 1, 2025. Schools are not allowed to tell parents what is going on with their kids in terms of sexual identity. School districts are banned from firing or otherwise punishing any staffer at any level for grooming kids.
In 2017, a law went into effect that schools are required to notify all children about the Trevor Project, which is advertised as a suicide hotline, but is in reality a grooming program. The suicidal children are assigned "mentors" who "help" them in their "sexual identity development."
Thank you for all the info. I have a lot of configuring to do. It's sad that these precautions need to be taken.
Good luck and stay safe.
In January, I had some internet issues that were caused by an unusual equipment failures and email blockage issues that were allegedly system failures, but I do wonder if I was targeted -- especially since they happened one right after another. Communications was difficult for me all through January.
Thank you for the very useful information. On this oath issue, my step 1 is to confirm that the oaths really weren't filed and that this wasn't a gap in filing. Then I'll notify Pam Bondi. I'm hoping she takes care of it and I don't need to do the steps you've outlined above.
I also have another government corruption issue that I'm working on (this oath issue sprang up from info I uncovered while working my other issue), and the info you've provided is especially useful for that other issue.
I was delighted to have the opportunity to share what how evil the Newsoms are. :)
Yes, all of these people working without oaths should not be collecting pay/benefits.However, while the current State Controller has an oath herself, several of her underlings don't and I have notified her of many others who are working unlawfully without oaths, and she has done nothing about making them sign oaths (including her own staff).
I hope, when we get a "real" government in place that we claw back all the money -- or, at least their retirement accounts, if nothing else.
As for the bonds, this goes back to what I was saying about statutory law being demonic in that it's easy to deceive. They added a clause to the end of the bond laws saying that an insurance policy was reasonable substitute for a bond. Except, as discussed above, the "insurance" policy they utilize does not do what it is advertised to do. It's all about deceiving people into believing that the government employees are following the laws when they are not.
I wanted to add some more reasons why Newsom belongs in prison:
Pay to play schemes: https://openthebooks.substack.com/p/newsom-inc
The birthday party during covid at The French Laundry was paid for by PG&E. Shortly after, he changed laws to screw over fire victims and protect PG&E: https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/abc10-originals/pge-gavin-newsom-lobbiest/103-2fc7d4f4-a0e0-492d-ac1d-ec674e58a67b
I also posted another comment with a couple links to the Newsom's CRT program where they pay themselves to show porn to kids.
Oh, and I wanted to add that I have been pursuing the lack of due process issue that you had suggested, too, via administrative channels. Lack of due process will be part of the federal suit, if that comes to fruition.
Well said.
Thank you.
Newsom's dad was best friends with a Getty. It sounds like Gavin's parents were unstable, so the best friend unofficially "adopted" Gavin. https://slate.com/human-interest/2020/08/kimberly-guilfoyle-and-gavin-newsom-power-couple-liberal-elite.html
The Gettys and Prtizkers are partners in crime and have funded Newsom the entire way: https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-pol-ca-gavin-newsom-san-francisco-money/
Fun Fact: Jennifer Newsom sued Harvey Weinstein for sexual assault in a class action along with several other women. The jury sided with the other women against Weinstein, but they sided against Jennifer Newsom because they found her to be "not credible." : https://www.newsweek.com/harvey-weinstein-guilty-sex-crimes-los-angeles-trial-jury-deadlocks-gavin-newsom-wife-1768283
You failed to mention that part of that CRT program included showing pornography to the school kids: https://openthebooks.substack.com/p/newsom-twosome-siebel-newsoms-films.
More details on how the Newsoms pocketed a lot of money from the CRT program: https://openthebooks.substack.com/p/newsom-inc
Thank you again for all the info you gave me earlier. I have been mulling over the info you've provided. I haven't gotten back to you yet because I am still mulling, but at this point, I feel like the federal filing looks like it is the option most likely to bear fruit.
If I go that avenue, I won't be able to start working on it until this summer, which works out okay time wise, as it gives time to see what happens with the Trump administration and the constitutional courts issue. Since all the issues I am dealing with are fraud -- accounting fraud with FTB and people fraudulently posing as government agents by having no oath -- I have time to strategize and research.
After doing this government corruption fight for 8 years now, I've come to the realization that not only is statutory law rigged, it's demonic in its nature where it makes deception and rigging easy.
Fortunately, the issues that I am dealing with are fraud, and there is no statute of limitations on fraud. I haven't decided what my next move will be yet in large part because things are so chaotic right now.
I am hoping that if President Trump starts arresting the politicians associated with Epstein and Diddy, that a bunch of CA legislators are locked up and we have a chance at bringing in new legislators that will uphold laws. If so, the situation fixes itself.
There are more administrative options I can try. I've already tried a lot of administrative options. While none have yielded fruit, all have brought forth more evidence, so none of them was a waste of time as they make any potential litigation all the stronger.
The movement to bring back constitutional courts is making headway. If constitutional courts are restored, that is my first choice.
There is also a federal suit in statutory court, which I am not eager to do but will if there are no other options.
Thank you. :)
The state created an office called the Office of Risk and Insurance Management (ORIM) that was supposed to create an umbrella policy to cover every government employee in the state. So the state was self-insuring itself against the state employees violating constituents rights in a manner which benefits the state, which sounds like it shouldn't be legal since it is a conflict of interest. I can only assume that initially, ORIM really did provide this blanket policy, however, it does not nowadays.
As far as I can tell, nowadays, ORIM issues approvals on whether or not you can sue the state. No one is allowed to sue without ORIM approval. I have filed 7 complaints: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2073. I got permission to sue from the first complaint, but they ghosted me for the other 6. There is no way to follow up as they never answer the phone, do not return calls and do not respond to emails. ORIM is a complete fraud.
You make great points. With Scott Wiener, there is no doubt that the lack of filing was indeed intentional since he hasn't timely filed an oath since 2016: https://www.change.org/p/demand-scott-wiener-s-immediate-removal-from-office-for-committing-felony
Dominic actually hung up on me shortly after making the statement about not needing to conform to antiquated laws.
In the same letter with the oaths, the SOS confirmed that not one of the people has a bond (details in the link at the top of the post). However, the lack of bonds was a given, as the California government stopped issuing bonds when Reagan was governor: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2219
I love that imagery! In California, the state attorney general has sole discretion regarding prosecuting oath violations. Our AG is evil incarnate (he was pushing a bill to make investigating the death of a child 30-days old or younger illegal). He will not prosecute. I am hoping that since oaths are required by federal law, that Pam Bondi does prosecute. I am waiting to contact her until I am 100% sure. That is why I am asking Californians to try to help me verify.
Yes, as stated in the post, I believe that they have unilaterally decided not to file oaths because of their stance on protecting migrants, which they know is treason of oath.
The problem with school choice is anything that gets money from the government is subject to bad government rules. I don't know how much each district spends on education, but in CA, it is about $18 k per child per year. I think CA should set up "pooled resource centers" with specialty equipment (such as microscopes for science lab assignments), and that the biggest chunk of money should go directly to the parents. The parents can spend the money as they see fit on their child's education. Some will use the money to hire tutors, others will have one parent quit working so that the parent can homeschool, some will find alternative solutions that work for their own family.
The key here is to run under the assumption that parents will do what is best for their children until proven otherwise. The current assumption is that parents will not do what is best for the child, hence the government needs to control the funds and dictate how funds are to be spent. As a society, we need to change our mindset about autonomy and personal sovereignty.