4
Confabulation 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is this why adults that were raised in wealth are often such fucked up people? Being raised by nannies and housekeepers and other wage slaves leave a child unwhole.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well lets hope it isn't..all that. lol. No, I bet it'll be pretty steady run of the mill madness for a good many folks for some time, yet. Like always.

3
Confabulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because we don't believe anything here, as a matter of course. Which is why we can consider and espouse anything. Movie shit. Normie stuff goes over there, yonder.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is some seriously naive...dude, I don't know where you are from but the goal is to enrich more than the elites. The 1%. But it tracks that you'd espouse that stuff given what you think of the american farmer class, and the land itself. You and I aren't on the same page, son. And POTUS isn't about fucking over the 99%. It's called MAGA. It's called an Awakening.

Again, not everyone is obsessed with being rich. That doesn't mean they should be disenfranchised. Why do you hate the hard working middle class?

Also, POTUS doesn't actually support all data centers. That is a normie understanding of The Movie. Read Q drops and understand Sun Tzu. MAGA isn't a bunch of morons so naive as to believe what you are saying.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

But the wealthy retards need to be protected! Imagine how bad our lives will be if wealthy people in NYC that don't give a fucking shit about people that aren't in their club, aren't protected! We must make sure to maintain the big club that we ain't in.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

They got China to invest fully in green initiatives. I mean to an incredible degree.

In 2024, China invested over $818 billion in its energy transition, more than double any other economy.

China’s renewable capacity is growing faster than its fossil fuels, with wind and solar now being the largest sources of new power.

China aims for peak emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, though emissions may have already peaked in 2024.

The whole country of wackos got brainwashed. Unreal. They'll probably never recover.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a simple yet somehow societally imperative fact that one must be crazy to get it, fool.

birds of a feather

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hippies? Farmers aren't hippies. Hunters aren't hippies. Not everyone is obsessed with "owning" people. Turns out a lot of Christians think Gods green earth and His creation is pretty fucking great and seek to be stewards of its beautiful resources for their grandbabies.

You want to be like china?, and copy their massive wind farms and mountainsides of solar panels. You and "hippies" have that in common.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

You heard it here first everyone! Draughts aren't real. Climate doesn't change naturally or by any means at all, ever. Never has. Lakes and rivers that disappear and fields that become fallow are figments of your imagination!

And the water cycle that we learned about in grade school? Well it doesn't have any time lag. Fouled water, salt water, water with PFAS, it all just zips right through the natural water cycle just as fast as we can use it. No lag. No detention time.

Dude. Stop. And don't try and convince peoole that farms are comparable to data centers. There is a disconnect you aren't picking up on because you are enamoured by money, apparently. Again, not everyone looks forward to a future where jobs are scarce and a few people got rich as fuck off these things.

btw. only about 1% of americans ever got wealthy in the gold rush. And an even smaller percentage off of the spice trade. lol. Look it up. Take off the tunnel-vision.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those famously lefty farmers that think they don't like data centers next door but really do. lol

And obviously I know they don't produce goods. I made sure to point that out. They produce for the shareholders. Now you are being straight forward.

Well believe it or not, not all american patriots are concerned with shareholder profits and they certainly wouldn't put that concern above the farm land or natural resources for their broader community.

Look, it is fine to have different opinions and motives. Americans have been doing for 250 years. Judt don't pretend that as a matter of fact all people should be happy to have data centers in their midst or they are somehow morally defective or wrong abiut their preferences. It is intellectually dishonest and reeks of manipulation.

3
Confabulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

What about the complaints of the people that live near them. The ones that have been living near them and have experience with that. Are they wrong too? They actually like it but think they don't?

And those data centers that produce more than farms. Is it really good? Like have you tried it yourself? If you put corn/wheat/beef/etc that's produced at the data center next to the products of the farm, can you tell a difference? Does lots of production always = good? The more garbage city produces the better?

Neat.

3
Confabulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

You know how big business feels about protecting an endangered fish species or a fragile habitat that supports rare natural specimans? And how they try and paint peoole that care bout that kind of thing as weak and/or gay? Well pardner, that's how they feel about this and the people that would defy their will here, too.

It's a big club and you ain't in it. They just need you to stay busy hating the "other side" long enough to get whatever they want. None of this is surprising.

Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the same advice normies would always give when anons would try to wake people up to the satanic cabal and adrenachrome.

You would tell them about ritual abuse and Q, and the tunnels. etc. and they would roll their eyes and explain that you were lost to propaganda and distracrion from the simple secrets of happiness, which is: keep your eyes and ears on your family, your local community, and God. Its a winning combination every time. Don't get into spats with people over things that simply can not be proven or disproven in a tangible way. Life is good.

People lose friends and family trying to explain to them the end is nigh, type shit. Always have. People walk away when they are told The Plan and 6% won't be saved. Not a great strategy after all.

I'm glad you posted this. Thank you for coming around.

3
Confabulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've never believed in dead people. It is weird being one of the few people smart enough to sense that death is fake.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

And rule number 1 is you gotta keep it ominous. Charles Manson kept it ominous. He knew.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›