4
CubeAnon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doesn't mean there aren't individual Indian political activists and wings working for a bit of that political pie.

Races aren't a monolith.

3
CubeAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't you love that they try these retarded "Trust Trump" slogans, to manipulate us into taking their eugenics vaccine?

They really think we're idiots. As if we're just waiting for Dear Leader to deliver us our latest orders.

Nobody should be this desperate for somebody else to have a vaccine.

15
CubeAnon 15 points ago +16 / -1

A McMerkel.

1
CubeAnon 1 point ago +2 / -1

A further point to be made is that you'd expect Presidential media to be using high quality cameras. The entire video is fuzzy, presumably to hide the green screen, but just look at Biden's blurred "outline" on the road "behind him"

Nobody's arm blurs in this obvious way unless you're trying hard to eliminate the green screen artifacts on a low budget.

7
CubeAnon 7 points ago +10 / -3

It doesn't match up at all.

-1
CubeAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Oh, forgive me o great and noble saviour of internet plebs. Whatever would I do without Raymond Panelli's sage guidance about trusting the government?

15
CubeAnon 15 points ago +17 / -2

Translation: "I initially posted, claiming that it had been DEBOONKED by some Twitter anime fag, and upon being called out on it, I uploaded a side by side comparison to my personal Youtube account, which doesn't actually support my claim but I keep claiming it does every time I repeatedly spam it in comment replies to the same fucking guy multiple times"

1
CubeAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, given that you've literally spammed this shitty video to me and other members multiple times in this thread, as a desperate cover for having linked some Twitter wanker's DEBOONKING and being called out on it, I don't have the desire to watch it again.

Stop fucking spamming, lol

-2
CubeAnon -2 points ago +1 / -3

Already watched it. No questions. It wasn't a debunking, it was just a failure of consistent superimposition on multiple angles.

-1
CubeAnon -1 points ago +2 / -3

That's not a debunking job though.

All it proves is that they fucked up a green screen superimposition on multiple angles.

1
CubeAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol.

Follow EVERYTHING.

The fact that you're so desperate to convince us there's nothing there, is pretty ample suggestion that there's something there.

"Only follow X, not Y, Look here, not there! Only research this specific narrow band that I want you to research! This will lead us to the truth!"

Do you understand how ridiculous you sound?

1
CubeAnon 1 point ago +3 / -2

Lol

"What question do you want me to answer? Do you not understand how 2+2=5?"

2
CubeAnon 2 points ago +4 / -2

Okay, I'm a handshake account. So take my words with a grain of salt, as you would.

But typically, shill 101 is "That thing you see clearly with your eyes, don't believe that, it makes us all look like idiots". Oh no, we wouldn't want people who denigrate us to continue denigrating us! We better all be quiet and not point out the obvious inconsistencies!

Been brushing up on the 1984 or what?

To ignore the evidence of their eyes and ears was their final, most essential command.

4
CubeAnon 4 points ago +5 / -1

Translation: "I'm TOTALLY an old member of The_Donald, I mean, I am literally a memesmith you guise. I'm so tired of not getting the truth from the mainstream media, which is why I now get all my hot debunking facts from anime degenerates on Twitter! You're all conspiracy theorists! No, I will NOT answer the question as to how foreground layers go behind somebody, and instead try to reframe the issue as "the size of the microphone". You know, because I'm objective and truthful like that. In fact, I'm so angry at you all that now I will NEVER answer why the microphone goes behind Biden. AFTER ALL THOSE YEARS OF EPIC WEEN MEMERY ON THE_DONALD, THIS IS THE ISSUE THAT FINALLY BROKE ME! I'M NEVER COMING BACK TO SCHOOL, NEVER!"

You're trying too hard, dipshit.

7
CubeAnon 7 points ago +9 / -2

And yet foreground elements consistently go behind him.

You're not convincing anyone.

Nice disinfo agenda you got there. Would be a shame if people basic logic'd it.

The size of the microphone is immaterial, when it literally goes BEHIND HIM.

But hey, nice linkage to a cartoon avatar'd Twitter account who celebrates being a degenerate, for all that hard hitting investigation.

4
CubeAnon 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just had some Regeneron. Got it from CodeMonkey himself in the cult vault. I'll be fine.

Also lol, seriously. You're under the impression that we're sheep who do whatever Trump tells us to do.

Do leftists just think we're cultists, because they're cultists and have no ability to understand that people have individual thought? That we're just waiting for the latest piece of programming to arrive?

9
CubeAnon 9 points ago +9 / -0

Because the team of Indians and Chinese handlers would fuck up basic US military protocol with whatever actors they have playing soldier guards and give the whole game away.

3
CubeAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know that the Hillaries after this one weren't the same woman who collapsed. There are multiple doubles. I even think that the initial 2016 Hillary was a double.

I can't find the video right now, but it was an ex Clinton staffer who brought up things like her eye colour apparently changing.

It was at like, a small speech in a book store somewhere, or something along those lines. It's bugging me that I can't find it.

3
CubeAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now, I'm sure we all remember this one.

The people in the foreground are supposedly filming Hillary, but the images on their phones do not show Hillary or the distinctive striped background.

Now, I'm not sure if the next part exists in this video, but it might due to the fact it contains the crowds. It's a moment where Hillary and the podium disappear and glitch, while the striped BG layer remains.

I know there's a FOX version floating about from back in the day, still with the crowds, but according to one comment in their comments section "This has been reuploaded and they removed the green screen artifacts".

So I don't know if this version contains the podium glitch, but it was a very obvious and publicized glitch in the Anon circles back in 16. I have no desire to watch an entire "Hillary" speech to find that specific moment, but if anyone knows where the original version of the video is still uploaded, feel free to link it in the comments below.

At the very least, there was a sloppy rookie release in the panic after Hillary's side of beef collapse, and at least a minor attempt to correct it and erase evidence before they just went on with plan B of bringing on the next news cycle.

view more: ‹ Prev