"My industry is not consumer based." There's always a consumer somewhere in business or there's no business. Manufacturers are also consumers.
"...the uses are determined by the material properties..." Those aren't immutable circumstances. Applications don't imply inherent value. Needs change. Materials can become outmoded, even just by their cost when a reasonable material compromise exists. Materials or certain material applications can even be outlawed. If nobody wants a thing, the thing becomes valueless.
"I am saying it has no physical applications..." Bitcoin has a physical application in helping to destroy central banks and the results could be plenty "permanent".
"I like gold, silver and copper...", "I am not a crypto naysayer..." Good choice. It would be unwise to treat financial instruments as the local sports team. I would say it's an example of tribalism, programmed into the public's behavior through mass media.
"The difference is that gold and silver have actual uses..." Bitcoin has an "actual" use: it's a weapon.
Nothing has inherent, immutable value, including precious metals. It's just consumer interest (including industrial consumers). Metals are interchangeable in applications, with compromise in their properties. "...intrinsic and extrinsic..." is just a way of insinuating inherent value where none truly exists. All the "...intrinsic and extrinsic..." talk truly amounts to is an academic discussion about consumer interest.
Either people (and industry) want a thing or they don't; that is the only source of value in anything, gold included. Material applications are just another form of consumer interest and they are not immutable.
"...what else can a Bitcoin or any other digital asset be used for?" Bitcoin and other decentralized crypto can be used to help destroy central bank faggots. There's one example.
"...etc have an actual use..." This just amounts to consumer interest. You may choose to ignore Bitcoin's uses, but people are using Bitcoin (and not only by trading).
"There is a difference..." If nobody wants it, nobody wants it, and the value is zero. Yes, this can happen to gold, too, (for example) through factors like government force or other influence. The precious metals market can also be manipulated, proving that gold holds no inherent value. Discussions of intrinsic and extrinsic value are academic; if no one wants the stuff for any reason, its value becomes zero.
"No more billions disappearing into the deep state swamp." I promise nothing that makes CBDC a wicked control mechanism will equally apply to the satanic collectivists. Nothing else in their system applies equally to tyrants and peasants. There is no silver lining in their deeds.
"It only has value because people agree to trade in it." That would be anything, gold included. No, gold does not hold a magical property called value; its worth is impacted by consumer interest. Obviously, if no one wants a thing, that thing is worthless. When cooked down, that's all this trope about decentralized crypto (like Bitcoin) really says: "It's only worth something because someone wants it for some reason." Well, yea. Of course. We want Bitcoin because it's not a centrally controlled Fed bank scam like CBDC and cash. We want it to trade or (maybe) we want it for any variety of other reasons.
"Isn't Bitcoin, etc, just digital fiat..."
Nooope. "Forge" a bitcoin to prove this assertion. ⏱️
Hopefully, they won't spend much time sitting around in prison. Hopefully, justice is carried out in a timely manner.
It would be a shame if you made a collection of Hunter's drug videos and photos and sent it to her. Of course, she's then just going to hop onto the "Hunter isn't president" square. That is, however, one position closer to getting an info-dump about "the big guy" using Hunter as a bag-carrier for Joe Biden's treason.
There's a heavy Consume Product stench here this week and I don't see anyone cleaning up their filth. Q was a uniter, not a divider. Collectivists (nazis, communists, globalists and Satanists) use ploys like age and race to divide and control humanity. If there's a useful idiot around to fall for it, there will be a collectivist around using it to empower their mobsters.
Generations don't make choices. Only individuals make choices. It's not possible for anyone to look at an individual and determine they were complacent (OR complicit) due to bullshit like age or race. It's also not a useful behavior for anyone interested in getting most of humanity on the same page. Collectivists (commies and nazis, for example) use superficial bullshit like age and race to divide humanity into small, manageable groups. It's a very old scam.
There is no single entire generation who can be marked as complacent and only divisive shills would try to peddle that lie. Rational, real people wouldn't regard adult INDIVIDUALS according to age, race or any other utter bullshit like that. Something nazis, commies, socialists, globalists and satanists all have in common is the DEEP desire to divide humanity into as many tiny, squabbling, MANAGEABLE groups as possible. This IS NOT part of Q's message; it's a wicked method of control employed by inhuman, collectivist bastards and their useful idiots. I'm not falling for that scam. kek "WAKE UP" indeed.
"...their generation really dropped the ball for this long and got duped,"
I don't recall Q blaming any particular generation for your woes. Reality isn't that simple.
Ivy League fraternal obligations would be enough. We also need to remember that we don't really know the guy; we only know his public-facing end, which exists in periods of an hour or two every couple weeks.
Why are you lying about this lady? Where's the evidence of anything you just insinuated about her?
Hmmmm... Thanks for the resources! The link points to a very large website of general information regarding a variety of health problems and a variety of substances, as opposed to a Fenbendazole/Ivermectin cancer protocol. It all appears to be insightful, though. Thank you.
Well done! How did you figure out the dosage?
Now I see that he said some scary words, too.
Being "heavily armed" isn't illegal.
ford42! 😄 Now, the trick will be remembering, so that I don't accidentally get in a fight with that account on p.win. 😳
"For [democracy]."
I didn't say a material replacement necessarily offers equal or superior properties. I said compromises can be made in design and circumstances for material use can change. Those changes aren't restricted to engineering expectations. Sometimes, a material becomes more expensive than it's worth, for example, and a compromise is made. The material can also become the target of government regulation, making it less useful for an application. When those circumstances become adverse enough, nobody wants the stuff and its value becomes zero. Please see asbestos and DDT.
There are many, many other examples, including those that fell out of use due only to changes in technology. If, for example, our technology moves on from electrons to particles or radiation that aren't affected by electrical conductivity (which is taking place), the demand for gold as a conductor will eventually drop nearly to zero.