Hmm - wonder where that will lead? I thought they were cooperating?
that's the one - MIL assets are definitely being moved - not sure exactly what "central locations" might mean - citizen riot control could also refer to "civilian" riot control, as in getting control of the illegals and getting them out of here -
Idk about all of it, but when the 82nd and the 10th Mountain are suddenly called up and sent down to the border that is definitely "movement of MIL assets."
*And POTUS is on board AF1 at this very moment.
Excellent - would be great to see one post with reports from anyone who is tracking, either this post or any other - I'm watching!
He said they're in Queen Anne, which is part of the downtown district. Should be a lot of folks who see this, if ICE is really there.
If they otherwise meet the requirements for U.S. citizenship, then yes, they are citizens. Above, I was talking about how to determine whether an infant born on U.S. soil is automatically a U.S. citizen or not.
However, I personally believe that anyone who claims "dual citizenship" with ANY other country should absolutely not hold any elected office, no matter how small.
thank q! I really don't think it's that complicated and I sure hope President Trump can get this officially straightened out.
It doesn't even matter whether the baby's parent(s) are here illegally or not.
What matters is whether the baby born in the U.S. has at least one parent who is a U.S. Citizen.
If not, then the baby is "subject to the jurisdiction" of the parents' country and is a citizen of that country, just like they are.
Please see my comment above for a little more discussion on this.
The 14th Amendment says: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, are citizens of the United States."
There's a great big AND in there. Both conditions must be true in order for you to be a U.S. citizen.
You might have been born on U.S. soil, but you are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States when you are a citizen of another country.
And if neither one of your birth parents is a citizen of the U.S., and are citizens of another country, then you're a citizen of THEIR country and NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
The 14th was passed to address the question of emancipated slaves following the Civil War. Those people were born on U.S. soil but told they were not citizens under the law.
But neither were they "subject to the jurisdiction" of any other nation, either, since they had never even been to any other nation and had no ties to any other nation.
That made them stateless persons. The ONLY nation they were "subject to the jurisdiction of" was the U.S., since that's where they were born and that's where they were living. So it was decided that they would be considered citizens on that account.
Illegal migrants are not stateless persons. They are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. because they are already citizens of another country. And if a baby born on U.S. soil has parents which are citizens of another country, the baby is a citizen of the parents' country and is not a stateless person.
That is why birthright citizenship does not exist unless it can be shown that the person born in the United States is a stateless person - and illegal migrants are not stateless persons.
The outlook seems to be, "We have to get ahead of the Chinese on this AI stuff." So, being Trump, we're gonna do it in a big way so that no one has a chance of getting ahead of us.
And with, unfortunately, the way AI is taking over everything and with how many very foolish normies can't wait to use it, it's probably the best approach. Hiding head in sand and hoping AI goes away is not going to cut it. Something like this requires an all-or-nothing response and Trump is giving us "all."
Larry was born in August of 1944. He's 80 years old.
Yes. Those commercials are just revolting to listen to and they get worse and worse and worse with more and more and more and more new drugs.
Get it out of here.
Their smiles were unnerving
They did manage to inflict heavy damage on the USA, and found out how easy it was to manipulate close to half the population to do whatever the news tells them - to the point of getting that half to turn against and disown their own families.
They also still have their millions of sleepers hidden throughout the country, just waiting for the signal to act. We have to expect that they will inflict more and worse damage on us before ICE forces them out.
The Bushes, the Clintons, and Obama sat there smirking like the cat that ate the canary because they're looking forward to the destruction to come. I would put nothing past them.
Nessun Dorma applies to us, too.
Trump telling the world Hillary is a good person at the inauguration
Say What? I missed that!
I gotta wonder if the actual Village People group know this and are ok with it - either way, it's pretty awesome
thud
That was the sound of me falling over dead.
So THAT's why that song...
thud (again)
Was that recently? At least you know you're not alone. It's a byproduct of seeing Trump actually get back into office.
Yes - for everyone! They just don't know it yet.
Thanks - I have, pretty much, so we'll see. All we can do is wait.
Oh, they really hate that one, lol - even though you're right. They're convinced all gay people and all non-conservatives are going to be rounded up and put in camps. These are otherwise perfectly intelligent people and you can't tell them otherwise.
And all the people being deported by ICE are just poor families who need a "better life." There's no such thing as drug cartels or terrorist sleeper cells coming in.
It's crazy what people will insist on believing when their worldview is at stake. And how they'll cut off their own family members at the knees if they dare try to tell them anything different.
There may be a cure for cancer, but I don't think there is any cure for losing your worldview. You either learn to roll with it and realize that NOW things can get better, now that you understand -
or else you bury your head in the sand and insist that it's crazy to think our leaders might be criminals (except for Trump, of course.)
A dark cloud in an otherwise great day.
Roberts had already started the oath. You can't place your hand on the bibles for just part of it. It was either go with it or stop and start over. Trump went with it, which was the best choice.
no - Roberts started too early, before Melania could get there with the bibles. Either way, there is no requirement to swear on a bible or anything else. All you have to do is raise your right hand and repeat the oath.
no - Melania was standing right there holding the two bibles - Roberts started too early, before she could get there - and that was no accident.
No - Roberts rushed in and began administering the oath before Melania could reach the podium with the bibles, and before the rest of the family could get there to witness it. It was a screw-up that had to be intentional.
There is no requirement for any candidate to swear on a bible, or on anything else. The person is required to raise their right hand and repeat the oath after the person administering it. But that's all.
This was not a comm. It was Roberts messing things up and there's no way it was an accident.
You can get the gel form - the "paste" made for horses - from any feed store or tack shop - anyplace that carries hay, grain, and other supplies and equipment for horses.
You can also order it directly from Amazon.
Adjust the dose by the weight of the person taking it.
It tastes funny but isn't bad. I chew on a piece of hard candy after taking it.
It's exactly the same medicine as what you get in tablets, just cheaper and easier to get in the USA.