What are you trying to say?

Respectfully, this video might be a little beyond your paradigm and you should browse that channel for some introductory stuff.

The Bible has been censored. The information war is nothing new.

https://patriots.win/p/15IXu1PhCT/nice-work-pedes/c/

Why are they even wearing any pins? Could the deep state be putting Marshall pins on the SS just to mess with you?

Honestly, are they required to wear pieces of flare as part of the uniform?

Ah ok. Sorry about that. It's a strange video someone shared of holographic dolphins over a concert. Very real looking. Maybe can find it elsewhere.

Interesting video. I'm not sure it answers very much about the shape of earth but after over an hour of the planet rotating away it ended up only 30 miles north an a little east. So it's another observation that shows zero spinning.

If you believe God can become man and be born from a virgin. Then there's nothing in Enoch that you cannot test and validate.

I'm saying the scientific evidence of a spinning earth is lacking.

I'm pointing out that our observations are that of a stable earth with a chaotic yet somewhat predictable weather pattern. Not an atmosphere that is uniformly matching the Earth's rotations sufficient to hide the expected behavior of smoke on a spinning surface.

The fact that I find the Bible to be true doesn't excuse observational science to support that belief. Science just always does end up agreeing with the Bible when it's not distorted by doctrine. The spinning earth model is nothing more than doctrine.

Well on the scale of 9/11 or any huge wildfire, where smoke is abundantly spewed into the sky for days or weeks... You have to end up with smoke rings or you have to assume another invisible force other than gravity is laterally moving the atmosphere.

You've probably did a loop on a rollercoaster. It's natural to counter gravity by rotating. If you rotate a ball, you'll see the equator necessarily has to move faster than the poles. And you could connect strings to the ball and see them point away from the axis not the center of the ball unless they are connected to the equator.

Now that is the observable physical science. Gravity pushes down (or toward the center) and the centrifugal pushes away from the axis. Something must erase that force on the grand scale of earth, yet the same force comes back to explain the shape and expansion in space. Weird.

You're essentially requiring an enclosure to counter the other forces. This is the adhoc explanation for spinning earth not behaving like a spinning earth. I've used to use DirecTV. I spotted Saturn with a cheap telescope using an app on a phone with GPS. Clearly there is a functioning cosmology that we can use to our advantage. But some things just do not agree with observable science.

I'm asking questions that don't have reasonable answers as far as I can tell, without accepting that the spin isn't there.

So you're suggesting the atmosphere just has enough momentum then? Effectively you're now giving clouds and the atmosphere basically an orbital velocity. Nonetheless, traveling with this moving (physically dense) atmosphere should cost more fuel than traveling against it to cover the same distance east or west.(points on the ground are headed east)

We need to burn fuel to counter the downward force of gravity and go the opposite direction. Now you have asserted a lateral force exists that we do not need extra fuel to overcome.

Great. And we can test how energy is lost to contrary physical interactions.

This is why we know about these physical laws. We observe them. You're suggesting the vacuum of space explains why the atmosphere is rotating virtually at pace with the surface regardless of the rest of physical laws at play.

Ok so test it then. That's all I'm doing.

I'm not sure how they are confusing. But I am confused about how a spinning earth at 1000 mph rotational velocity at it's equator and have a starry background that remains consistent for thousands of years. You realize stars in constellations aren't actually anywhere near each other, right? (According to the text book)

It's called the great awakening.

Thanks for engaging the actual questions.

Yes the atmosphere is not tied to the ground as inside the buss. The earth should behave more like if you were on top of the buss.

The great awakening might be bigger than you can imagine.

I'm not arguing flat. I'm just saying stable.

I can't make sense of the spinning globe with the observable predictable night sky.

All I'm saying is we can't be spinning. What magical force is counter acting the observable centrifugal force? It should increase toward the equator making you weigh less as you go south and more as you go north. We tend to believe science can't be corrupt before 2020.

I know that many will say that Hosea is just to the Israelites. But I think we confuse ourselves by assigning scripture to people groups. In Hosea the woman is drawn into the wilderness and comforted and sustained, like the Israelites when they came out of Egypt.
Then Hosea 2: 16 And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, that thou shalt call me Ishi (husband); and shalt call me no more Baali (master).

17:For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name.

Here we see a marriage between God and this woman after she forgets her previous 'masters'. I think if we say that is only to Israel then we exclude ourselves from that marriage. I think the bible is much more oriented upon grafting into the vine, the spirit of adoption and the uniting of the Body of Christ with the Root of David. So there is much to consider about what this prophecy is saying to the modern Christian church.

Yes all good things are from God. I would say to remember that it is a walk though. And reading the Word is not a work. It's just how your relationship grows.

I'm not mad. I'm just encouraging a great awakening in the body of Christ. We do have the freedom you say but we are living in a paradigm that distracts is from the truth. So my questions about the calendar and my hints about sun worship are meant to make people think about this.

Our Bible tells us one thing but we do another. Why? I say it is meant by the enemy to distort our knowledge of Jesus.

Also I believe as it says in Hosea that the bride of Christ will be cleansed and even forget the names of Baalim (the gods of the world nations) before entering into the Kingdom. In other words, I don't think we're reading prophecy correctly.

Jude (that book right before Revelations your bible) quotes the First book of Enoch and calls it prophecy.

The page you linked to makes very dismissive and frankly incoherent assertions about the book without any SCRIPTURAL refutation of Jude. If Jude was quoting something written by Enoch then wouldn't you like to read more of it? The website sets a strange standard that I'm sure they do not apply to all the other quotations throughout the bible.

I will read more of their "refutations" but I'm already noticing a trend. It's like the Washington Post writing about the bible. ' It claims a virgin gave birth to a child, but that's impossible! ' well golly.