0
Fat_Moco 0 points ago +1 / -1

Water is the oldest level tool on earth. because it always finds the level. You can build extremely long canal systems and trust the water to always agree. The water never knows when to change angles.

And the plumb line never gets confused either. If you use a bucket of water and a plumb line you can always find a right angle. scale it up, still works.

1
Fat_Moco 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well Enoch does help sort this all out.

Got a question for you though. How did a chinese balloon casually drift WEST --> EAST across the continent? Imagine jet-streams which the diabolical chinese have mastered the use thereof?

that was a fun week. People almost started to realize that "satellites" are balloons.

Or how about that smoke cloud over East Palestine? It was orbiting with Ohio right? So smoke orbits and balloons overcome the orbiting air molecules by fabulous aerodynamics.

1
Fat_Moco 1 point ago +1 / -0

content moderation should keep the globe theory safe for a little longer. ;)

1
Fat_Moco 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have been taught that the spinny ball was discovered and confirmed. It was not and it is a lie.

The bible within the covers, does call it a stable structure with a firmament above. It does not tell us which day God spun it all for no good reason, but it does say that the luminaries were created on day four in the firmament above.

0
Fat_Moco 0 points ago +1 / -1

that water Magellen was sailing on proves the shape. Or do you think sea water defies physics?

2
Fat_Moco 2 points ago +2 / -0

oh it is a very real problem that you think you can see light that traveled millions of miles straight at a spinning ball that you're riding on. The problem gets worse with greater distance and speeds. It doesn't vanish. And centrifugal force pushes away from the axis but gravity pushes toward the center. No problem there either I guess?

You're thinking that gravity is perfectly counter-balancing CF wherever you happen to be standing I suppose?

I have no problem with light travelling straight. Actually all of my observations make a whole lot more sense on the Earth God describes than the stories the "fool on the hill" tells himself. (Beatles reference, good song)

The significance of Enoch is this: He wrote that the Full Moon would be rising at sunset. That's not just saying it comes up on the East. It's timing. He was not an astronomer. He was a prophet. Refresh your memory, read Jude. Jude quotes Enoch and calls him "prophet of God", "seventh from Adam". This is pretty high endorsement. Plus Jesus said "as in the days of Noah". It would seem they expected us to be familiar with Enoch's writings.

I work in GIS - geographical information - (among other things). You probably have more formal education than I do in GIS. You should know that a map can be modeled or wrapped onto any shape. Math can model. It doesn't make the model necessarily real.

So I believe the scriptures. If you can believe in a virgin birth then you should have no trouble with biblical creation.

0
Fat_Moco 0 points ago +1 / -1

maybe the "covers" should not be on the bible. The "bible is just a convenience. It used to be a huge library. Then politicians and tyrants censored it and told you to never learn the other books. Meanwhile they started teaching evolution and globes to children. A few generations later, you think you know stuff. And sadly you think the bible is wrong about earth and creation.

What day of creation did God spin it all?

1
Fat_Moco 1 point ago +2 / -1

Well you could just call it navigation. Also circles can be flat.

You think sailing around on the FLAT water proves you live on a prison planet that the globalists need you to believe in.

They also require you to believe that you evolved and there is no Creator.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
2
Fat_Moco 2 points ago +2 / -0

I learned that believers in the textbook wave all the problems away by imagining that unfathomable distances take care of it all magically.

Kinda like the theory of evolution which is totally impossible also becomes a science "fact" when you throw billions of years of time at it.

You think light can travel thousands of light-years virtually in a straight line, while you spin at 1000 mph, having no centrifugal force, and you can see pin points of light in the sky. Just because they're so far away.

You know. Enoch wrote about Earth's design, and the courses of the sun and moon. Also how the stars move.

He wrote that the full moon would be rising in the east while the sun is setting this coming Passover.

Whether you regard this scripture as truth or not, it's evidence among lots of archeology we could visit, that proves the ancients had no need for a NASA to spend billions of dollars to produce crappy special effects and play with computers - to tell them how the cosmos rotates around us. As a clock the way God made it.

Btw, the moon is not missing for half of the month on earth.

3
Fat_Moco 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/429/the-moons-orbit-and-rotation/

Put yourself on that spinning ball. My count I should have about ten nights with no moon.

How far away is the nearest star? How fast is it orbiting earth? Well it must be orbiting earth if you can see it on that merry go round.

The moon is about 1/4 of 1% the distance of the sun. According to your books. With a very coincidental relative size in the sky. But it maintains that light pattern and keeps up with our spin so we can observe it. With a field of conspiring stars. Each at their extreme distance synchronized with our "spin" .

When the cosmos is rotating at a speed based on Earth's "spin"... I'm sorry that means the earth isn't, and the stars are.

0
Fat_Moco 0 points ago +3 / -3

Hey maybe you're right. In a world where truth don't matter you can believe whatever makes you feel ok.

2
Fat_Moco 2 points ago +3 / -1

The moon and the earth both have the same light source right? The earth spinning the moon is not right? The tiny moon is caught in earth orbit right?

How does the tiny object flying rapidly around the rapidly spinning earth LIGHT PATTERN CHANGE VERY SLOWLY while the light pattern on earth is moving constantly?????

Take your time. Do experiments and computer models of you must.

3
Fat_Moco 3 points ago +4 / -1

Glad we got all the fallacy and appeals to useless authority and expertise out of the way.

1
Fat_Moco 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could not respond to this back when you commented on this post. You see, at Great Awakening, you're not really allowed to question certain things that the globalists require you to believe. (i got suspended) I chalk it up to them being insecure here. They don't want to be associated with those flat-earthers we are all encouraged to mock (in total ignorance). (that's how satan works) but I digress. And they have no clue that the spinny "globe" is yet another globalist LIE.

You are giving the textbook explanation. It simply does not satisfy the ridiculous claims of the spinning globe. These concepts are sound and observable. But they do not scale out to the insane requirements of the globe theory. Plus the water INSISTS that the earth is a flat creation. Earth is not even a "planet".

I learned that everything must be tested against the Word of God. and Then I discovered that Enoch is legitimate scripture. And then I was observing the stars and realized. Enoch was telling the truth, your teachers, not so much.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +10 / -11
2
Fat_Moco 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well it's all about how we see things. Much to grumble about each generation, but so much more awesomeness. The youngsters have been very frustrating for sure, but there are many who are finding the Word, being filled with Holy Spirit and hearing the call. It's something to behold.

3
Fat_Moco 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow. Thank you for that. I've been seeing the story of mankind more and more thru an eternal lens lately, if it's even ok to think that. But I think that's kind of the point of consuming the Word of God.

5
Fat_Moco 5 points ago +5 / -0

ok but I perfected ambiguous dry humor.

3
Fat_Moco 3 points ago +3 / -0

Way too many Palestines. I rolled it back after posting and figured, happy accident.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›