Why does it have to be either/or and not both/and?
Eating for pleasure does have its risks, and excessive eating, aka gluttony, is warned against in scripture. Yet Christ ate and drank, so much so that the Pharisees tried to accuse him of gluttony.
Eating also has another pleasurable aspect: the fellowship that it facilitates. Hanging out with your friends is always more fun when you have something good to eat, right?
And if eating can have its pleasurable aspects, then so can sex within marriage.
Did God not create the human reproductive system? Both men and women have organs in the reproductive system whose sole purpose is to create feelings of pleasure.
Don’t attribute to Satan the good things that God has given for us to enjoy in the right place at the right time.
Just an FYI: no one in this thread can prove that there is a “U.S. dollar” that is separate from what the federal reserve prints out. This is NESARA type garbage.
Anything involving India and China is probably a scam. I don’t want anything to do with those third world hellscapes.
Studying the universe is not uncovering God’s nakedness. Not a thing at all.
How is studying particle physics related to undoing the confusion of languages?
The picture is just a mock up. The actual system is much more complex; it spans the entire several kilometer track of the LHC while providing precise timing of signals on the order of nanoseconds.
A more complete article with open source documentation: http://white-rabbit.web.cern.ch/
If your family, friends, etc., are Occupy anarchists, then they’re not ready for this site anyway. Even a lot of the people at PDW hate this site, and they’re actually Trump supporters.
I’m glad that you care about your folks, but it sounds like you have your work cut out for you to wake them up to basics first. GAW is for people with rock solid support for Trump and a willingness to face uncomfortable truths. It’s for advanced anons, not people who were Leftists yesterday. They’re not going to listen to us no matter how nice our language is.
We hope your family and friends come around to our side, but we’re not going to censor ourselves for the slight possibility of that happening.
-
They are useful idiots and pawns. They don’t think for themselves, they do what their professors and media idols (aka MK Ultra handlers) tell them to do.
-
They are protesting against aspects of government or society that they do not have complete control of yet. They only dislike authority when others have it.
-
Those are all the same people who a few years later went right along lock step into the mask mandates, lockdowns, and jab mandates. That’s when they showed their true colors.
It’s analogous to the FBI encouraging a mass shooter to use a gun, so that they can obtain their actual objective of banning guns.
The Left embraces authoritarianism and sees the government and media as incapable of doing wrong. The Right embraces individualism and sees the government as incompetent at best, corrupt and evil at worst.
Given Q’s celebration of traditional American values and exposure of the evils governments are committing, I believe it’s safe to say that Q is most definitely Right wing.
None of that has anything to do with course language and insults. If you know your friends are too thin skinned to deal with it, you can still discuss the same topics with them yourself.
The harder someone insists that the dollar is crashing “soon”, the more likely it is they’re trying to sell you something. Which they will gladly take your dollars for even though they’re supposedly going to be worthless.
If the dollar ever does crash (which it may very well do at some point since fiat currencies are inherently unstable), then precious metals are last on the list of things that will be of use. Water, food, medical supplies, and ammo, in that order, will be worth more than their weight in gold then.
Repeatable experiments have proven the "comm channel" has been demonstrated and proven.
I have studied undergraduate physics for years. "Comm channel" is not a thing. Same with your "non-local communications", that term has nothing to do with physics and is used exclusively by New Age charlatans.
What you're probably thinking of is quantum entanglement, a phenomenon caused by a widespread misunderstanding of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. A misunderstanding that is cleared up by Stochastic Electro Dynamics (SED). See this article:
https://www.barrysetterfield.org/Quantum_Effects/Quantum_Effects.html#introduction
All Atoms exist in an energy field
This is correct, it is called the "Zero Point Energy" (ZPE), and the interaction of particles (electrons, protons, neutrons) with this field is what gives those particles mass.
an atom isn't solid, it is 99.99% energy
An atom taken in isolation isn't in any state of matter at all, solid or otherwise. States of matter specifically describe the energy state of a collection of atoms or molecules. Also, mass and energy are interchangeable, something being described as "99.9% energy" is a functionally meaningless statement.
I saw operational code being developed under DARPA programs back in the 1980s that were already communicating directly with the human brain.
These are called Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI). They require a target to either wear a headset full of electrodes in contact with the scalp, or require the target to have electrodes implanted in the brain via surgery. This is not new, and you can explore this facet of neuroscience yourself with DIY kits. You will rapidly discover that voices and thoughts are impossible to detect or implant in the brain even with electrodes, much less remotely without any equipment. The human brain is far too complex, and thoughts far too non-localized within the brain, to interact with, detect, or influence except by normal verbal communication.
You are right that emotions, especially high amounts of stress, can provoke a response in DNA expression. This is no different than any other physiological response, and has nothing to do with "non-local" communication. Given that your brain is talking to your cell's DNA, it is very much local communication transmitted by molecules and chemical reactions.
Human DNA cannot be accessed "non-locally", your definition of non-local communication has no basis in reality. The only way to modify DNA is to blast it with ionizing radiation, use mRNA tech, or use CRISPR. Useful for inducing diseases and deformities, and not much else. Likewise, you cannot track someone by their DNA unless they leave some of it behind at a given location. DNA is not a homing signal.
Graphene oxide is in the death jabs, but its function has not been demonstrated at all. Back when the graphene oxide hysteria was first picking up steam, I could only find one proof-of-concept patent for how graphene oxide might be used to create a transistor. To say that a communication device can be built from a transistor is like saying you can build an F-150 because you created a single bolt for its engine block when you haven't even built the engine block yet.
To be clear, graphene oxide is dangerous to have in your body. The fact that it is present in the death jabs in unacceptable, but that does not mean it can communicate with things outside of your body. That claim has not been proven in the slightest.
All atoms communicate with all other atoms in the entire universe.
Uh, no. Not even close. Atoms cannot communicate because they are not intelligent. Communication requires an intelligent sender, an intelligent receiver, and an intelligible code or signal.
we are indeed programmable and AI can indeed find you through your DNA signature and download.
- Humans are not programmable. We are more than the physical matter that makes up our bodies. We are not just biological machines.
- Unless you leave traces of your DNA everywhere you go, you cannot be tracked by your DNA. And the Deep State doesn't need your DNA to track you anyway, you already carry a tracking device with you that actually exists and works.
- Download? An AI program can "download" your DNA from your person without a tissue sample? Please, do explain how that works.
Obviously you are unaware of this. No problem. Most people are unaware.
Ah, condescension, the tool of people who knowingly spout nonsense and don't have the evidence to back it up.
Yet, within the scientific community this is widely understood.
The scientific community widely understands that "non-local communication" is a joke.
How were these numbers derived? What tests were performed?
What exactly is oscillating at these frequencies?
Really?
What frequency is hate?
What frequency is love?
Very true. I suppose I unintentionally use the term to refer to the 10 people (7 military 3 civilian) who have the “full picture”.
That’s not how AI, programs, atoms, or DNA work. At all.
What do you mean by a soul returning where it means to?
There are only two destinies for your soul after you die. Where you go is contingent on one decision that you make in this life.
The human need to reconnect with God is spiritually based, not physical. Has nothing to do with DNA.
Reconnecting with God only requires faith in Jesus Christ.
Your DNA is important because any attempt to alter it can easily result in unintended consequences to your health.
We don’t understand how all the information encoded in DNA works at all. We’re like monkeys throwing a wrench in a quantum computer to see what happens.
Any hack on Twitter can claim to be on the Q team. I’m not buying it.
People don’t like to think about how other people can be so evil because it directly implies that they themselves are capable of such evil as well.
The pyramids aren’t long lasting because of math, it’s because they’re made out of stone and inhabit an arid climate. Even so they have sustained significant damage; their outer white limestone casings stripped away and their interior treasures looted. You’re looking at a hollowed out skeleton of what once was.
Also, the earth receives exactly the same amount of sunlight year round. Local seasons are caused by the earth’s tilt, which causes the same amount of sunlight to be spread over a different part of the earth at a different angle.
If you’re going to base your ideas in what’s “natural”, you may want to brush up on your grasp of the natural sciences first.
Oh, so the Cabal goes out of their way to fly thousands of miles to a lifeless rock that’s -80 degrees to conduct their business. Instead of, you know, meeting in America/Europe, which they already live in and control.
Let me know when NESARA kicks in and we all magically get a cash payout from the Vatican’s stash of gold.
By this logic we’ll be going from light to dark for the rest of the year.
This idea is not supported by scripture in the slightest. There is the commandment for Adam and Eve (and the descendants of Noah) to be fruitful and multiply, but that does not imply anything about the relative importance of pleasure in sexual intimacy. You are reading into the Bible something that isn't there.
Then explain Song of Solomon. Children are hardly mentioned, if at all. Yes, it can be used as a metaphor, but the metaphor doesn't make sense unless the physical or literal aspect is at least somewhat true.
Also explain Hebrews 13:4, "Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whore mongers and adulterers God will judge." No children mentioned there either.
It is not the focus on pleasure that is the problem. It is the obsession and idolization of it. The problem is not the pleasure, it is man's tendency to reject God's boundaries regarding how the pleasure is derived.
God created some things, like food and sex, that are inherently pleasurable when they didn't really have to be. He created them that way because He wants us to have good things and enjoy them, again according to His design (which actually makes these things the most enjoyable without the guilt and consequences of sin). The fact that Satan and our sin nature twist these desires into something abominable, doesn't render the original pleasure itself sinful or "lesser".