My Opinion re: Flynn has not changed but only strengthened since I first learned about him in 2018.
It's a narrative war, and the shills have been doing a targeted attack on Flynn heavy for years now. Why? Because he knows where the bodies are buried.
His book 5G war, is a must read for anyone working in the anon/Q info war sphere..
I mean, in my opinion!! :D
Imo, Ariel is a deep state shill. 100%
https://x.com/SunTzusWar/status/1863056041014964586
His account on X is now locked. Hmmm...
Don't know John Rich from Adam, but ....
If indeed Hunter now has immunity, he also has NO Criminal Liability. Which also means he cannot plead the 5th during any questioning. He cannot "incriminate" himself, because he is (we're not sure yet, 72 hour rule) immune to criminal prosecution.
I personally would not be surprised if Hunter flipped on his family way back and then leading Sleepy Joe to be captured and flipped, laying the foundation for one of the greatest red pills in recent history. If so, a full pardon might be his 'reward'....
Time will tell.
So happy and glad to hear that Miss Fish passed through this safely, Steve.
Thanks for being an awesome dad.
Peace and blessings on your fam, man.
We have a new meltdown, folks.
This time, its our tadpoles! The still-normie anons. Plusof course further, deeper greater meltdown by all sorts of lefties and democrat true believers!!!
Anyone upset about Our Boy Blue pardoning Hunter for 'all crimes committed since Jan 1, 2014'?
Putting aside the question of whether a President can pardon uncharged crimes (i.e. he can pardon convictions, but not things that have never been convicted?), I'm absolutely loving it !!
This is fantastic. Absolutely great. I could not stuff more popcorn in my gob than i have right now. But (and I stress to make this clear), I will munch, enjoy and consume this popcorn because I am supremely confident that there is going to be so much more winning coming along.
But Biden pardoning Hunter? Abso-flippin-lutely wonderful! Melting leftheads and normies alike.
Once again, we have to look at the IMPACT of an action, but the appearances. This is going to help the maga cause so, so much!
Of course, along with some other of the best thinking anons, I have come to feel very convinced that Joe Biden and Hunter were flipped way, way back, and that they have been playing ball. Seriously, compared to the whole flippin corrupt system, they are the smallest of small fry.
We don't need them. We need to destroy the "whole corrupt Temple". And, if they can save their skins helping that objective out, I really don't mind.
You'll have to excuse me now. I need to get more salt for my next batch of popcorn.
See also:
https://t.me/absolute1776/37126
From NewsTreason Channel 17 (Dave)
Are you pissed off by this?
THAT’S why it’s being done.
How do you expose corruption?
How do you expose nepotism?
“Sometimes you cannot tell the public the truth, you must SHOW them”
I firmly believe that Hunter flipped oh ol’ Joe a LONG time ago and this is nothing more than a 5th Generation Narrative deployment designed to piss off the normies.
Paul Fleuret (Absolute1776)
Just so we’re clear: It wasn’t “black hats” or the DS that pardoned Hunter.
That anger you feel? Yeah - You’re supposed to.
There is no better way to show the hypocrisy currently embedded in our system of justice than for OurBoyBlue to “pardon” his dipshit son.
XPOST (https://x.com/realabs1776/status/1863406414313537986?s=46&t=F6MKWT9WdUtkXxZCqm0KPw)
Actually, an important point:
If the so-called pardon sticks, then Hunter has NO CRIMINAL LIABILITY and so he cannot plead the 5th, if questioned. He cannot refuse to answer if subpoenad.
Why? For what purpose?
What is the message? To who?
He has done a tremendous job catching Chinese spying
Good point.
He read the rant, and the rant was good.
Lifelong, you say? You mean, like RFK jr?
Wray will certainly depart. But how, either by resignation or being fired. Time will tell.
However, curiously, Trump putting him in place in 2017 at least allowed a precedent or principle for Biden to keep him on during 2021-2024.
And, if you believe that Biden is controlled (which I do, more strongly every day), then it was very useful to have Wray in place during those years, instead of him being switched out as a regular cabinet member.
I simply do not see ANY benefit to Trump appointing a deep state mongrel to the position of Head of FBI for the duration of his administration (#1)
Sorry. I don't do hopium. Very destructive. Like crack or fentanyl.
I like hopermectin.
Thank you Dom.
then I feel it stands to reason that it must be the ENTIRE Biden Admin is in on the game
I don't agree. If you have certain major players in place, then many minions simply follow orders or can be kept in the dark.
I.e. Blinken, Majorkas, etc.
If it is a controlled demolition, how does that work? It means allowing a certain amount of collapse under their own weight (i.e. you know what they will do because they are rotten) BUT also controlling it by holding the main keys of power, so that it never gets too out of hand.
The opposition of those two elements are key to the "controlled" part of 'controlled demolition', imo.
I think i understand folks who read "trust wray" etc as "trust these people to be rotten", but I'll reiterate my own view, that these were a signal to anons paying attention that
"You are going to see some weird stuff, but you simply cannot take it at surface value. We have people in place to do certain things. Don't just consider the appearances. IOW, Trust them, because there is a plan and they will play certain roles"
But yeah, thanks so much for sharing your thinking and furthering the discussion.
Indeed. Indeed we shall.
Alas, I fear that some actively disliked reading that part.
I appreciate the encouraging feedback.
A thoughtful reply. Thank you.
What I would like people to provide a serious well-thought out response to is:
If Wray is Deep State, why would Trump appoint him to the FBI for 3+ years of his administration?
The usual "oh, he didn't know" or "oh, he wanted to expose Wray" etc are extremely superficial ideas that simply do not hold water in the context of Q or a military-level operation to destroy the Deep State, imo.
A lot of people simply cannot get past the emotional reaction they feel when they think they see Wray, or Barr, or Pompeo, or any other number of actors behaving in way that stirs them (triggers them). That's a real problem, imo, and I've come to conclude that I have to ignore such people. They don't bring any clarity or thinking or discussion to the matter. They only bring opinion and angst.
And interestingly, one way to tell if an anon is a shill or still normie is how they react to news and how they judge people at face value.
Yep. But even then, some of them are so convinced of their own (outraged) reaction that they think they CANNOT be wrong.
Plenty of examples around. Whether they know it or not, they are really hurting the cause of truth.
Thank you Tynyyn. My response, re: Joe Lange:
Is he that bright or did Q give him some tidbits and say, "go look into this".
Well, not, his IS that bright. And YES, Q gave him some tidbits. THAT is what the Q board is. That is what the Drops are for.
The difference is, some people approach the Q drops and simply react emotionally. Many commenting to this post display exactly the attitude and mentality I warn against in the post.
Many of the folks at Badlands, however, have taken the Q board and the Q drops and are simply thinking, applying the lessons, and thereby gaining real insight.
We don't need hints from Q. We already have it all. That is the Q board. But it is what people do with that, that makes the difference.
DEFECTED at Badlands was a great example of this. Those guys went full throttle into defecting from the narrative wars and working through everything with not only critical thinking, but highly self-reflective thinking, (self-criticism), and applied solid intellectual honesty.
Same with the Devolution series by Jon Harold.
ON the other hand, you have a LOT of fly-by-night opportunists who don't care about truth, self-reflective or not, but only about gathering audiences, gaining influence, exploiting shallow thinking and reactive emotions. They are the real opponents we have in the information war.
Above, someone wrote "I don't care what wrote about Wray. He's Evil" (paraphrased). That says it all, doesn't it. That person is far more wrapped up in his/her own feelings and viewpoint and doesn't even bother to consider what Q might have been trying to educate him or teach him.
It's all there, in the Q board. But some indeed "don't care", some just get lead by their distrust (and its usually clear when that is emotionally driven, although not to the people themselves doing it), some also try hard to exploit, while others like Joe Lange put in hard work, really applying the methods and approach, to come up with very high grade quality thinking.
Chris Wray screwed up by allowing January 6th to occur.
Do you really think you know everything about J6, and what happened?
In the war to liberate America and the world, do you NOT think that in certain situations, sacrifices would have to be made?
Chris Wray screwed up by allowing January 6th to occur.
Actually, Donald Trump allowed January 6th to occur, didn't he? He was President. Could he have overridden certain things, made sure it would not happen?
Blaming Wray for Jan 6 isn't reasonable. It's a knee-jerk response thinking that somehow it could have been prevented WITHOUT GREATER LOSS to the objective of accomplishing destruction of the Deep State.
Do you think that Eisenhower and the Generals in ww2 were wrong to send the invasion troops to Normandy? Some 210,000 allied casualties.
Would you have blamed Eisenhower?
Thanks for sharing your view, but I think you have really missed the entire point of the Q operation. but that's just my opinion.
So, the question is, why do you think so? The fact that you say "I don't care what Q said about him" would suggest that you are certainly not applying Q's approach or logic, but are just pissed off because you think that "Wray is as deep state as you can get and Evil".
I don't mean to denigrate your opinion, but I question on what it is based. I think its worth examining that.
You are setting up a false equivalency. If Flynn is NOT offered a position in Trump 2.0, does this mean he is dirty? No. It will mean he is not offered a position in Trump 2.0. That's all.