thanks for thoughts. I am firm believer that sunblocks cause skin and likely other cancer ...between the lab chemicals in them that are absorbed and/or adsorbed and the fact that either way they block the uptake of natural Vitamin D it seems only logical
they are called useful IDIOTS for a reason. I think the cabal would do away with the idiots first and then take their chances with controlling the seemingly more intelligent dissenters. heck they only need about 7% of the population of the world to go along with their program to get to their utopian 500M pop
I did a little looking into Warburg effect and certainly seems to make sense. guess I'm thinking in simpler terms for a normie to change diet without getting too deep or complicated for them as a regimen to follow. would an alkaline green leafy diet not produce proper biological conditions without meat in your opinion ?
I wish they'd have just rewritten the Act with all of the changes incorporated instead of having to figure out what sections to replace with what
we know they intentionally make these legal docs all gobbly guk though
YES SUE those MF'ers
exactly the harm those damn masks cause and even Fauxi proved it, although they didn't mention masks once in their research paper, it's an obvious and easy link to make through other science
I don't doubt that's possible. I do think that at the point cancer is identified though that it's imperative that one goes with an alkaline diet, meaning no meat
i presume that to have gotten to the stage you have cancer however one is likely been poisoned by other things that aren't specific result of meat....vaccines, GMOs, non stick cooking pans, fluoride, etc
I've done fair amount of research and from it I'm of the opinion that too much meat and dairy is not great for us. particularly avoid processed, non-organic and/or genetically modified. moreover, cancer thrives in acidic environments (meat and dairy driven diets) and dies off in basic/alkaline environments (green leafy vegetables diet)
check out this info if interested
Healing Cancer From Inside Out by Mike Anderson
not if:
- you claim "religious" exemption
- you have allergies/adverse effects from the PEG (also found in Miralax so tell your dr you took this and how deathly ill it made you for days)
- you use the Nuremberg Code to your advantage which doesn't allow these "vaccines" to be used on you for a number of reason such as having never been tested on animals
if all else fails, don't work there anymore!
good luck
The Gateway Pundit and Hoft brothers are amazing and seemingly at least somewhat linked in, so i will not bash them. I've never known them to attempt to present anything but the truth and correct themselves when mistaken. the available video and other evidence however suggests ashli didn't take much of a hit that caused any significant bleeding so something is fishy here. i wish TGP would look more into this unless they are part of a Q/white hat plan...perhaps the white hats staged the shooting to see how nanxi and others would scramble after they knowingly allowed and likely coordinated "insurrection". blood on their hands probably means nothing to them but perhaps it screwed up narrative. perhaps a false flag was planned for some demonrat to be "killed".
i hope we some day learn the true story
I'd bet "adrenochrome" and "pizzagate" for starters would turn up some pretty stark examples
if look for more G rated stuff probably make a good case just by searching "trump accomplishments" and "hillary corruption"
not suggesting you're a glowie or some other cabal creature, but this seems like just the thing they'd try to make most people think about and believe so when we all see videos of the sick shit they're doing with kids they can claim it's all just deep fakes
any lawsuit sidney brings she needs to show injury. appropriate lawsuits against dominion are exactly the lawsuits that will be heard tomorrow at SCOTUS. If thrown out at SCOTUS there's a chance sidney will get very limited discovery FROM dominion, but instead be required to show what she based her claims on. something tells me she has the goods. and by defamation standards i don't think her sources have to pan out to necessarily be true as long as reasonable and she can't be found to have acted with malice....at least i believe this is how it should go
look up webb hubbell and what happened to him and similarities to Chelsea vs Bill