2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think there was actual covid. They did engineer a virus.

No and no.

Why don't you INVESTIGATE the claims?

Not interested in understanding the issue?

Just want to follow your favorite "expert" without utilizing your own critical thinking?

They did intend to kill people.

Very possible, with the fake vaccines.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

It has nothing to do with swinging for the fences.

It has been proven by actual science (in 2021) by German virologist Stefan Lanka.

But most people here on GAW refuse to look at the evidence, much less understand it or talk about it.

I bet 99% here cannot even explain the process used to "study a virus."

Everybody just ASSUMES it must be real because "people got sick" -- yeah, like they do EVERY Winter since before you were born.

If you are interested in the research that was done on this, check this out. He has done the real research, and funded a real study:

https://rumble.com/v568k86-title-do-viruses-even-exist-this-doctor-says-he-can-prove-that-they-dont..html

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

The length of the loops of the spike on the FCS

There is no spike protein, because there is no virus.

This is like debating how long the horn is on a unicorn. First, you have to prove that a unicorn even exists.

Same with any virus.

No lab ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has any sample of SARS-CoV-2 ... because it does not exist.

Virology turns out to be a scam fake science.

ALL virologists who think they are studying a virus use the same process to do so.

That process CREATES "artifacts" (pieces of material/debris).

An electron microscope is the ONLY type of microscope used to study this.

No human can SEE DIRECTLY anything in/from an electron microscope.

They use a process to produce photos from the electron microscope.

Those photos are what virologists use to claim to "see" this or that.

But what they are actually looking at in those photos is the debris from the PROCESS that was used to end up with those photos.

It is called the "cytopathic effect." It is the end result of this process, which is a FRAUDULENT process.

ALL the so-called "research" that people point to to "prove" this or that about the genome, or the spike protein, or anything else related to the "virus" ... is done IN SILICO -- which means a computer program, and NOT a real world test lab with a real virus sample, because ...

NO LABORATORY IN THE WORLD HAS ANY SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2.

Anybody can create a computer program, and can create it to arrive at per-determined conclusions if they want, and they can run all sorts of simulations.

That MIGHT, in some cases, provide a good starting point for real research, but at some point, they have to take it into the real world (a lab) and test something REAL that exists in reality, and not just a theoretical computer model.

NOBODY HAS EVER TESTED SARS-CoV-2 in the REAL world, because NOBODY HAS A SAMPLE OF IT.

End of debate.

All these lab leak stories are limited hangouts to divert from the truth.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will save you the time.

An attorney will refuse to do it, and will tell you not to do it. An attorney owes his first allegiance to the COURT, and NOT to you the client. This is the law. He has no choice. This is why most of them are not worth a damn.

How many attorneys got any of the J6 prisoners off?

Zero?

Shows how little effort they put into it.

If he thinks a judge wouldn't like it, he will tell you not to do it, and more importantly, he is acting INSTEAD of you. You have NO RIGHT to take any action if he is "representing" you, and so he will just refuse to do it.

But that is in your CRIMINAL court case.

There is nothing stopping you from filing your own case in CIVIL court, which is what the Writ of Habeas Corpus is.

You should educate yourself by watching the video, reading the comments, and decide for yourself.

Either way, best of luck.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

Boofuckinghoo.

They are criminals.

Tough shit.

Libtards like the Brazillian prez do not like to deal in reality and truth.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +4 / -1

Interdasting ...

Overall, I like what Trump is doing. One of the few to take office, and then take immediate action to do what he said he would.

So far, so good ...

But he does have a couple of blind spots, and those are very bad.

21
MAG768720 21 points ago +21 / -0

Hmm, mixed feelings ...

On the one hand, Trump got results in what? About 10 minutes? LOL.

On the other hand, a presidential plane from Colombia is a symbol of respect, and these invaders do not deserve such respect.

I'd be inclined to tell Colombia to just let our planes land, but I can see it the other way, too.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

...only when it benefits them...

Which is always.

;-)

(human wink)

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biolabs are probably to figure out how to create toxic posions disguised as vaccines.

That's why the pharma companies can rollout "vaccines" before the next thing comes along.

Gain of Function = so-called vaccines.

Covid (SARS-CoV-2) = fake.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

In silico = computer simulation.

Never done with a real SARS-CoV-2 virus, because NOBODY has a sample of that virus.

No lab anywhere in the world.

Therefore, ALL the supposed "studies" have been done "in silico," which means via computer simulation, not in the real world.

4
MAG768720 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are you one of the people who was granted a pardon?

If so ...

You can still file a Writ of Habeas Corpus to end the restrictions on your liberty.

You should not be on probation if you were given a pardon.

Watch the short video, and read the comments by the creator of the video in the comment section. He addresses this.

You being out of jail makes this even easier.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly.

I think these "pardons" are not actually pardons, because they do not pardon a specific offense due to judicial misconduct or mistake, which is what a pardon SHOULD be.

We need to get a ruling from SCOTUS on this for all future judicial actions related to pardons/fake pardons.

And if SCOTUS agrees with me, these people can and will be prosecuted for their crimes.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct.

People need to understand the concept of "limited hangout."

A limited hangout is a narrative of something bad that happened, but it is fake and used to cover up the REAL bad thing that happened.

The story we were told is that "muh Covid" was caused by a virus that happened naturally in bats, and somehow jumped to humans in China.

Nevermind that Wuhan, China was the first city in the world to go fully 5G.

Nevermind that northern Italy was the second place to "get muh Covid" and also the second place to go fully 5G.

Nevermind that the media propaganda caused mass hysteria, full of false stories, that were used to convince people of false ideas, and many believed it.

Nevermind that the original Pfizer study showed NO proof of real sickness (only self-reporting of headaches and such), and showed NO proof of transmission of sickness -- NONE.

Nevermind that all this happened in Winter, when people get sick every year.

Nevermind that the "cold and flu" season never happened that year, replaced by "muh Covid" in the same numbers as annual cold and flu.

Nevermind that ALL the testing during that time was via PCR, which has been proven to be a fradulent way to "prove" sickness.

Nevermind that the inventor of PCR, Karry Mullis, was outspoken that it could NOT be used as a diagnostic tool.

Nevermind that Mullis mysteriously died just a few months before muh Covid started.

Nevermind that Bill Gates and his depopulation buddies held a seminar a few months before muh Covid to rehearse what the media and others should do if there was a muh Covid "outbreak," and the media and others did exactly that when the plandemic went live.

Nevermind that NO LAB IN THE WORLD has a sample of SARS-CoV-2. No lab ANYWHERE has EVER had such a sample.

Nevermind that you can't make a "vaccine" without a supposed sample of the supposed virus.

Nevermind that German virologist Stefan Lanka PROVED that viruses DO NOT EXIST, and that ALL virologists are following a FAKE concept -- a pseudo-science -- whereby the PROCESS they use to study a "virus" CREATES fragments of material that they then CLAIM is the "virus" -- but when that same process is used without any sample from a sick human, they get the SAME result.

The virus does not exist.

Cold and flu season is an annual detox that does happen (but not from a non-existent virus).

People suffered cold and flu, and it was re-labeled Covid.

Motorcycle accidents were also labeled Covid.

Coughing was labeled Covid.

Everything was labeled Covid.

Why?

Several reasons.

One, Congress passed the CARES Act, which gave $$$$$$$$$$$ to hospitals, clinics, and doctors to call things Covid when in fact they had no fucking clue what they were talking about -- but they got PAID.

Two, the cabal criminals wanted a test run to see what compliance would look like as well as to change what a "vaccine" is so they could create designer poisons in the future, and pretend it was for everybody's health benefit.

Third, it gave them cover for election fraud.

Of the 3, #2 was the most important -- by far.

Then, came the alternative stories to the mainstream fake news story.

Among them was the "it was created in a lab" story.

This is a limited hangout.

It is bad if true. It is worse than a "natrual virus" because it would mean it was man-made and accidentally released due to incompetence.

Those who believe this lie then debate whether it was accidentally leaked or purposely leaked, which would be even worse.

But those stories cover for the truth, which is far worse: there was NEVER any virus, and the entire thing was made up for the primary purpose of getting poisons injected into people to treat them as guinea pigs, so that they could do the next step in the future.

"Gain of function research" is about designing poisons that are disguised as vaccines, and figuring out how to convince people to voluntarily take it by scaring them as much as possible.

Population control is the most likely real story.

ANY other story -- any limited hangout story they could come up with -- is better than the truth, which is: They want to KILL YOU, and they want to do it in such a way that THEY are not at risk; therefore, they want to get you to accept the idea that injecting a mystery poison into your body (something THEY will never do) is a good thing for YOU.

Just be a good little slave, and STFU.

THAT is the truth.

view more: Next ›