3
MajorSalt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not so sure.

I would assume he's referring to the fact that Epstein probably isn't dead at all.

6
MajorSalt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Technically he's not saying the Epstein files are fake, he's saying the people that we all hate created them which is true since Epstein was an intelligence operation.

If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn’t they use it?

Because it hurts them, not him.

6
MajorSalt 6 points ago +6 / -0

People talk of doomers on here and I'll be the first to admit that following a plan that could be complex may feel, at times, impossible but holy batman this is pathetic.

Elon doesn't have dirt, he said Trump was in the Epstein files which is not news since we know Trump was on Epstein's plane more than once, flight logs are considered "Epstein files", that was released years ago long before Elon said anything.

The feud almost certainly fake and exaggerated but I'm also no fan of Elon Musk and his apparent love, or abuse, of H1B.

14
MajorSalt 14 points ago +14 / -0

Axios has posted so many bullshit "exclusives" that they should never be used as a source for anything.

1
MajorSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where'd that idea come from?

4
MajorSalt 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not very knowledgeable in Chess but the comments on the tweet also talk about how the Queen cannot Checkmate unless assisted by the King.

I wonder if this means we'll be seeing some moves from Melania? Or perhaps she already has and I've missed them.

10
MajorSalt 10 points ago +10 / -0

I haven't seen anyone post this and was curious what people think.

When I watched the parade it seemed very intentional and yet I've never seen anyone else do that before accepting a US flag.

Better video showing them getting into this position

2
MajorSalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s a real sad excuse for something that suppose to have been planned for decades, they can’t find a trustworthy lawyer who doesn’t need to be bought and paid for? That can’t be the reason.

2
MajorSalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

That just makes them look bad, I don’t see the win, especially because bondi doesn’t seem that special anyway, she’s just another lawyer.

1
MajorSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

And why exactly do you think the trump administration needs votes or capital from a fraudster?

2
MajorSalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where’s the justice in that?

1
MajorSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no idea what that means, I haven't "bashed" anyone by pointing out what other people on X thought should be done. Again I never said I agreed with resignations, clearly some on this website have a reading comprehension issue.

5
MajorSalt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sounds like you're the one jumping to conclusions, I explained what another post linked to because someone asked for it to be explained, the post was saying Hegseth/Waltz should resign, I never said I agreed with that.

My post literally says why isn't anyone else discussing this, not that it isn't a strategy or a mistake.

6
MajorSalt 6 points ago +6 / -0

They wanted their views on Europe known.

That's a stretch, far easier ways to let Europe and the world know.

Trump has come out on national TV and said as much and more towards this point of allies not doing enough to protect themselves vs the USA stepping in all the time.

5
MajorSalt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm surprised there's not a bigger post about this, this makes them look really dumb.

I can't imagine why this would've been intentional, the reporter didn't leak the story before it happened either so it's not like they could claim he was trying to ruin something not to mention the reporter did nothing to gain access to this information, he was invited so it feels more like entrapment if they're going to claim the reporter was acting malicious or intentionally trying to gather and leak information.

6
MajorSalt 6 points ago +6 / -0

People are saying Hegseth needs to resign because why are they using signal to discuss this and not a SCIF, and they're saying Waltz needs to resign because he's the one that added an unknown number and person to a group chat discussing it.

2
MajorSalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've noticed that trend as well and it's a good point to remember this is a public website that enemies read.

1
MajorSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well yeah it would be nice but I haven't seen anything to indicate that it's been done.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›