1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well we don't need to go that extreme lol.

But this is a video from 1995. You said that kids are being fed to aliens now. What evidence has led you to that conclusion?

How can anyone prove you wrong when you don't have any evidence supporting your claim?

3
Modeler42 3 points ago +3 / -0

Prove you wrong?

Prove yourself right first

Too many people are throwing out wild theories and demanding they be proven wrong without offering any proof themselves. This has gotta stop

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems that way yeah. Whatever is in place that keeps HFC out of their shit I want here

2
Modeler42 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let’s not get started on The “Learning” Channel

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

What ingredients list are you reading that has HFCS listed as first?

4
Modeler42 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sprite’s been around for decades. How old are you??

4
Modeler42 4 points ago +4 / -0

Uh…there’s no high fructose corn syrup in sprite. First ingredient is water

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

...what else are you using your cupboards for?

4
Modeler42 4 points ago +4 / -0

The History channel is a shell of its former self. It's no longer talking about actual historical events anymore

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

What am I missing with this comment? Why is Darkness written like that and how does it tie into the dates?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

I looked up some information on this! Interesting stuff really. Unfortunately size constraints means it can't function at a level that you're proposing, where unique signatures can be broadcasted over a set range.

It can be capable of passive data transmission, but not active data transmission (which is what bluetooth is).

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't say everything just because I work with bluetooth, but there is also no evidence of it existing. No patents, no pictures, nothing. Just stories you read.

If it exists, what is the tech powering it? Who makes it?

Why aren't there any imitations?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Says everything.

It's not possible. There is no instance of a bluetooth device working at that scale, that is small enough to fit through a vaccination needle.

I understand that you're going for the whole "anything is possible, we don't know what exists yet" angle, but I work with bluetooth technology professionally. I'm not just some "average person." It needs to be powered on to constantly be broadcasting a signal, and they just don't make bluetooth chips that small.

Is there more evidence than just stories like OP that have no verification?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bluetooth capabilities are not possible at that size though. There is zero instance of it happening.

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know why OP is silent on the questions people are asking if it's true. It really doesn't seem true.

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where did you get 6 vaccinated people to stand inside your faraday cage to test? How did they react?

4
Modeler42 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is especially important!

So many people REFUSE to show evidence. They only say BS like "I don't have time to show you" and "you should find it yourself but I won't tell you where to look."

IMPORTANT THINGS ARE HAPPENING!! You should ALWAYS have time to show everything.

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aw poor thing, having to stay in a castle with servants all day

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›