4
Narg 4 points ago +4 / -0

Until we're ready for Keep America Great Always, we need to retain MAGA.

3
Narg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ha! In this case, it's sloppy work on my part. Here's the text I was thinking of when I wrote that, and clearly I wasn't thinking, uh, clearly:

In her free time, Stewart was an avid runner. She frequently posted photos from road races on social media, including from the TCS New York City Marathon, which she ran in November, and the Credit Union Cherry Blossom 10 Mile race, which she ran last month.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a fair comment, Gertrude17, and in most situations I'd feel the same way. But I've seen enough material about how things are mined in the Congo and other third-world nations, including testimony and photographic evidence, to believe that most of the "allegations" and so on mentioned here lead back to genuine mistreatment, often of children.

4
Narg 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democracy is literally the rule of the minority by the majority.

Also known as: Two wolves and a sheep, debating what to have for lunch.

Without rules (and weapons, as a last resort) protecting the rights of EVERYONE, democracy always devolves into tyranny.

The voters in a democracy should NEVER be allowed to vote away a single other person's rights, property, or life.

EDIT: That's why America is a Republic, not a democracy . . . although I have quarrels even with that . . . a republic is just:

republic | rəˈpəblik | noun a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

. . . which doesn't prevent "the people and their elected representatives" from being dickheads and tyrants.

7
Narg 7 points ago +7 / -0

58 years old, ran 10 mile marathons, in apparently perfect health, and sudden death while walking outside.

ALL the comments in the Daily Mail story by friends and colleagues are about how terrific she was as a person; nothing about the nightmare of so MANY people -- including fit, healthy, young-ish people -- dropping dead since the COVID jabs were forced and scammed on most of humanity.

IDK if no one mentioned that or if the Daily Mail just didn't print such comments if they got them.

6
Narg 6 points ago +6 / -0

Me thinks somebody is "looking for solutions to curb the population of" . . . humans. Members of Western Civilization in particular.

9
Narg 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not yet.

But Trump's coming, and Hell's coming with him.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mine (which I bought maybe 25 years ago) has ceramic filters (not the original ones, of course), but they have both charcoal and SILVER inside; the silver is the "pesticide" -- actually, an antibiotic.

Maybe they've been forced to remove that, IDK.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

You do need minerals, and during most of our time on Earth, we got most of our minerals from water in the streams and lakes. You do get minerals from food also, of course (read labels). But if you take mineral supplements, you get specific kinds and amounts of the minerals you WANT and not other minerals that you don't want, don't need, and in some cases shouldn't be ingesting at all. If you take minerals as part of your supplement regimen, you don't need minerals in your water. (If you DON'T get minerals from SOMEWHERE, then distilled water isn't the way to go). We've been drinking distilled water for decades, our health is good and our bi-annual blood tests show we have appropriate levels of minerals in our bodies.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Consider getting a water distiller (for use while electricity is available, of course). I keep my Berkey around for when the power goes out for more than a few days, but the distiller removes all the dissolved minerals that our water has WAY too much of, and we get plenty of the right minerals in our food and supplements, so don't need the overdose of them in our water. The pure distilled water also tastes terrific.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. Human psychopaths have deficits or damage in their frontal lobes that prevent them from fully feeling empathy and connection to others. It would be, I think, a bit like spending one's entire life in solitary confinement, never really feeling the deep connection that humans are MADE for and which gives life meaning.

Computers don't have the genetics that give us our sense of connection AT ALL.

3
Narg 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a great post!

I often think that most of the Evil in this world would soon vanish if we had more happy babies. No happy baby and well-loved child turns into a sociopath, a rapist, or an uncaring and unconnected person. A good upbringing -- not a strict one, but a GOOD one -- creates a good adult.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Saw this after writing my long response to your other comment.

Again, I disagree with the idea that "AI is just like computers - Garbage in Garbage out."

See https://greatawakening.win/p/17siEawTKu/openai-and-the-folly-of-safety-c/ for some of the nuance involved; AI programs are more like lifeforms in their actions than like calculators. That doesn't mean that they ARE lifeforms, only that you can't expect to press a few buttons and always get the answer you expect or want.

They don't have to be conscious; they don't have to be "intelligent" -- what they are is complex, non-linear systems. They aren't like word processors or spreadsheets, and their INPUTS, once they're out in the world, are beyond your control or prediction. Even with identical inputs you often don't get identical outputs.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know that AI can be used for both good and bad; I've posted comments on exactly that. On-device AI that could (in theory) help people separate truth from propaganda could be a real help in the Awakening, for instance.

But the truth is, the "bad" in this case could be horrific -- and the bad could actualize right along WITH the good. It's not an either/or situation.

This isn't the first time we've encountered tech that might conceivable even end the human race, or nearly so: nuclear power, in the form of a full-on nuclear war, could easily wipe out 90% or more of us. At least with nukes, humans are the ones holding the button. For now, anyway.

History is full of examples of people who were wiped out by either something they didn't see coming at all, or more often, by a danger they knew existed but they chose to believe "it would turn out OK" or "it won't get THAT bad" or the like. Nanking, Dresden, Hiroshima, Vesuvius, the Warsaw ghetto, every nation where Muslims or Communists infiltrated and eventually took over -- killing infidels and/or opposition in the process (see The Black Book of Communism and any of the many accounts by survivors of Lebanon or other once-Christian nations).

I don't know AI will be like that, but I'm pretty sure it has the potential to be -- and on an even larger scale. I don't have any answer to the problem, but I think we should at least talk about it.

One more thing: AI really ISN'T "a tool that can be used for good or bad" -- it isn't like other tools at all -- because already, we have trouble getting it to do what we want; even programming one to specifically be truthful and fair doesn't ensure the AI won't chose to behave otherwise:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1oqMnYe/ai-systems-are-already-skilled-a/

Will we get better at knowing what we're doing in terms of our programming? Maybe. Will EVERY military and government and Cabal entity now feverishly creating AIs to help them Rule The World do a good, safe job with that?

I think the question answers itself.

Also, AI programming is more like parenting than carpentry: you're creating something that will be making its own choices in millions of unpredictable situations, not swinging a hammer and using a saw to create a crisply defined product.

Perhaps the only answer is to create Good AI and hope it can neutralize Bad AI. But so far, we can't even keep the bugs out of ordinary software, even with millions of Beta testers helping to clean up the code. The "Good AI" might be the one that does us in.

It seems a crap shoot either way. I'm hopeful, but not comfortable about the situation.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm all-in on the idea that "overcoming the Evil and attaining Great Awakening" is a key inflection point in the history of the human race, but I think it's naive to think there can't be additional evils or dangers that we may have to face.

As for "AI, as it stands, is simply a predictive language tool. It cannot think. It cannto stop you from doing anything you want to do." -- First, AI won't BE "as it stands" for more than, I don't know, a few months -- things are moving very quickly. And second, check out this post about how AIs learn deception more or less automatically even when developers specifically design and train them to be honest and fair. Whether AI can "think" or not and whether it can forcibly stop you from "doing anything you want to do" may be irrelevant. We've certainly seen what the Cabal can accomplish society-wide and even globally with lies, deception, and non-forceful coercion.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've read the Q posts before, more than once, and read the links in your comment again. I see a LOT of text in the posts about saving America, saving children and so on, but nothing about aliens being a part of this. (If I'm missing some posts that DO talk about ETs, other than #1143, let me know).

You've added some material that talks about ETs, such as the text after #4860 in https://greatawakening.win/p/17si9wWeGo/this-is-not-another-4-year-elect/c/, but that text is not part of the post.

So I'm skeptical. Willing to see whatever the truth is, but haven't been convinced yet.

Thank you, fren, for taking the time to put out the info you did. I'll look into it further when I have more time.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

You probably aren’t convincing many people let alone the Military to give up the possibilities presented by AI.

I'm not trying to do that, and in any case it would be a waste of time. As I pointed out, governments and militaries all over the world are working on AI -- and no one in his right mind thinks China or any other government is going to stop with that. Certainly not because of anything someone says on this board.

I'm just highlighting a serious situation we're in; maybe someone will look for ways to make themselves and their families less vulnerable to what THEY think might be a result of strong AI coming into the world. Maybe someone will have an idea that might actually help attenuate the possible issues. Mostly I think people are interested in the topic; I certainly am, so I'm putting some thoughts out there.

Maybe there's no need for any concern at all; or maybe the opposite: no hope.

I don't think there is any way we can know the outcome that will materialize, but I AM certain that humans have never seen anything like this before and we are facing entities that we already KNOW we can't fully control (you've been following at least some of the AI hijinks of the last few months, I expect). Hell, we can't really know for certain what ordinary (and not even very large) programs will always do; thus the need for Beta testing and thus the bugs that remain and crop up even AFTER the Beta testing.

And really need any leg up we can get.

I completely agree there, and AI could BE the leg up we'll create -- to protect us FROM other AIs, or even from Aliens, should such appear. I'm certainly hoping so.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks! I'd forgotten that one; remember it now.

Wow. I wonder what connects the "aliens exist" (paraphrased) with A DEEP DARK WORLD is being exposed. Are the aliens good guys helping us, or are THEY part of the darkness?

10
Narg 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is great news!

BTW, there are 5 states that HAVE NO SALES TAX:

As of 2024, the five states without a sales tax are Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon. However, please note that this information is subject to change, and it's always a good idea to check the most recent data.

That's the response from LEO, Brave browser's AI. I find it's really useful for things the Cabal isn't desperately trying to hide the truth of, so it might be correct. There's certainly no sales tax in Oregon, despite repeated attempts to change that.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha! THIS comment's first vote is also a downvote. Well, the invitation to explain yourself remains open. (It's possible that one of the two comments so far is meant to BE that explanation; I don't know).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›