2
NoMoreFun 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've learned to cook again ... not a major development but something to note :)

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm of the opinion that you cannot control the flow of information to the extent required to suppress major technology developments like this (and major activities like satanic rituals, etc), but I'm not here to debate that. Getting back to my original post, IF indeed the DS/Cabal CAN in fact control the flow of information to that extent, then that implies a truly amazing level of control / influence over every aspect of our lives. How can they have that level of control / influence and yet not be able to get to the higher ups in the military? Why are the military somehow exempt from this influence?

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a scientist / engineer, I have no doubt these technologies will be possible, so I'm not a 'denier' as such. But - my big problem with the idea you present here is - if in fact we had this technology today, why is not one single Mainstream Media outlet ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD reporting it? If it were true / available, keeping it under wraps for the exclusive use of 'hiding' a few people in leadership positions really doesn't pass muster. It would be such a big deal, with people willing to pay big bucks for it, that it would be crazy to keep it a big secret.

2
NoMoreFun 2 points ago +2 / -0

I should have said, 'clones'. Yes, a similar-looking person is a less challenging thing (even though you have to train them, control them, somehow separate them from their family / friends forevermore, etc etc) but there are some who claim the people we see today are actual 'clones' ... a technology we aren't even close to having. But just considering the 'lookalike' ... you have to make sure they never let on, somehow keep them from their former family / friends, etc - that's no small feat.

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's almost guaranteed NOT to get convicted; needs 17 Rep senators and there aren't that many willing to do so.

The much, much bigger issue looming for Trump is a New York State prosecution on his financial dealings. Like many business people, he inflated his assets (when applying for loans) and downplayed his profit (when filing taxes) and all that is going to come up in court. I expect this to be next.

5
NoMoreFun 5 points ago +5 / -0

I used to do IT for a big company that paid a lot for internet services. We got very good alerts and warnings about potential future outages. Then I worked for a company that was too cheap and used Comcast for internet. Those f**kers used to have outages all the time without warning. It's a sign of a maturing and improving industry that they are now being a bit more proactive ...

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, a man with anger issues! I happen to enjoy 'Beyond Burgers' - so even more reason for you to rant and rave and froth at the mouth against me!

I'm an engineer with 40 years experience in electrical stuff, so I think I know 'a thing or two' about solar panels. But stick with your pre-conceived prejudices, it's obviously making you feel so happy!

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is, I can probably find 10 'videos' out there to 'prove' black is white, up is down, and the earth is flat. I can also find 10 more videos that will 'prove' the opposite. At some point, there is an element of judgment involved, and also a huge dose of 'confirmation bias'. Nothing I've seen has convinced me that Trump 'controls' - in any way, shape or form - the British royal family. I don't care for them at all, and would happily see them gone, so I'm not 'rooting for them' ... But I am rooting here for common sense.

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are complaining about family members worrying about 'distancing'. I'm over 60, and I have family members over 80. Whatever your opinions of this virus, it's not illogical / unreasonable to take precautions to protect the elderly. Masks, vaccines, etc are a different story but basic safety precautions are, in my opinion, highly reasonable.

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why, because I won't criticize EVERY action of the administration? Some things are good regardless, and putting money into alternative energy is good for the economy.

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Building solar panels and batteries will offset any other aspects. Paris Climate accord is one of the better things that is happening. I'm an engineer and a lot of it makes sense.

3
NoMoreFun 3 points ago +3 / -0

For #1 - we survived EIGHT years of Obama, during which at least some of the time was dem controlled house + senate. So I don't see it as a 'fact' that cannot be denied. For #2 - Arizona (where I live) is actively pursuing voter-law changes to make it harder to steal, not easier. I believe other states are doing this also. Remember, voting is controlled at the state level, not federal.

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

What pedo symbol? At 1:44 I see an adult male upper-body outline, no 'pedo' elements.

by Raken
3
NoMoreFun 3 points ago +3 / -0

This country is fundamentally structured as a two-party system. Try to create a 3rd and you will likely just siphon off votes from one of the other two, guaranteeing victory for the party you don't like.

2
NoMoreFun 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm from the UK originally, and have some familiarity with the Queen (not personal - I just have familiarity with how the royal family 'works'). I really don't care for the royal family personally (can't stand the continuous attention), but I'm not aware of Trump 'owning' or dominating the queen. This seems far fetched.

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd feel a whole lot better if the fate of the world as we know it wasn't resting on a man who has some serious flaws ...

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

We do have elements of 'representative democracy' - people vote for reps, those reps supposedly do our bidding. This is one definition of democracy, and has been around since the founding of the country, so why can't we have the word 'democracy' in the description of the country?

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, but the US also has democratic elements; 'democracy' is inferred when you have people voting.

1
NoMoreFun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course you are right. But that doesn't fit the narrative that all stars are pervs!

4
NoMoreFun 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wow, one person out of 20 actually gets it!

4
NoMoreFun 4 points ago +4 / -0

I see so many people inferring lots from VERY low resolution / high compression videos. I used to play around with high compression when I used to 'rip' DVDs, and you see this stuff; details get whacked, etc. People are so eager to see what they want to see, they are going crazy seeing faces in clouds, virgin mary's in puddles, etc!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›