A lot of people use crack responsibly, you just don't hear much about them because they go about their normal life. It may technically be a crime, but it is a bad law and should not be that way. This is all part of the failed war on drugs.
If this is just older people dying a little bit early, is that a bad thing? Still, I see posts here all the time about the huge number of people dying from the vaccine, but none of the people I know who were vaxxed have died, except for one guy who was in a car accident. Most of them seem fine.
There are several reasons why more money won't devalue the currency. First is that if everyone had more money, they would probably save more of it as well. More money also means more technology, which makes people more efficient. Things like Roombas, washing machines, and iPhones mean that people can do more and create more value. Higher efficiency will drive down the cost of producing goods. Not to mention, if someone was selling a loaf of bread for a $100, no one would buy it, so the free market is self-correcting.
Being a "liability" doesn't mean the government can take things away. The constitution is clear "shall not infringe". If someone commits a crime, then they can be punished, but you can't simply take away someone's rights because they might commit a crime, that's the exact thing we're fighting against. Smoking crack if fine as long as you do it responsibly.
How is being addicted to crack a violent felony, or even a felony at all? I feel like most people I know have tried a few drugs every now and then. Even people who are high still have a right to defend themselves against tyranny.
That's the beauty of it. The government doesn't have to print more money. This is basic supply and demand. If there is less demand, then there will be more money without having to print another dollar, it's fantastic. With this extra money, we'll be able to drill more oil domestically.
If they can take away your guns for lying, they will be able to strip any law-abiding citizen of their weapons. It is a blatant violation of the Second Amendment. Nothing in the constitution says that we can't use some recreation medication while also owning a gun.
It does make me wonder about all the supposed deaths of Covid-19 and the vaccine. I haven't seen any of the bodies people are talking about either. If millions had been dying, wouldn't we see these bodies piled up in the streets? I wonder how often we're being lied to about these things.
But how much of this is just better testing? I knew kids growing up who definitely had developmental delays, but they didn't get any help and were never diagnosed. They were just punished by their parents for not doing better. I also knew kids who, now looking back, clearly had allergies, which is why they didn't like certain foods. It's not like these suddenly appeared out of nowhere, half the kids I grew up with weren't even vaccinated.
I'm actually really concerned about this ruling. Being able to give someone a felony for a paperwork error seems really over the top. I think they're doing this to set a precedent. They're going to go after gun owners, slapping them with felonies because they didn't right down that they took vitamins or something like this. We need to stand against this. No felonies for gun owners.
I guess as long as the person using crack is doing so responsibly, I don't have a problem with them owning a gun. It is true that drugs can lead to crimes, but not always, and it depends a lot on the drug and the person using it.