OK I'm not one of the smart people........I'm missing something.....so it's "cycles per second" right? And you are asking what is a "second" based on? What fundamental?
So what is a "second" based on? At this point I don't know.
There definitely is more to this than meets the eye. I'm not ready to throw Candace on the trash hemp just yet. Remember what "Q" said? We are watching a movie. In fact 3 movies will be playing at one time. Give this some time anons!
Good morning!
Many use Matthew 24:37 as an analogy for a secret rapture, there are strong biblical reasons why this passage is not a good rapture analogy.
In Noah's day, the one "taken, were taken in judgment, not rescue.
In Genesis the wicked were taken away by the flood (judgment). The righteous (Noah & family) were left alive on the earth.
If the analogy is consistent then "taken" means removed from judgment. "Left" would mean preserved to inherit the earth. This is the opposite of the popular rapture interpretation.
BTW George Soros, if alive, would be in his mid-90s (think 96!). He was born in 1930 folks! If he still is alive he most probably has transferred control to his son Alex. Alex seems to do most of the posting on social media. And when he allows comments he is getting creamed! He is being exposed just like his daddy!
Reminds me of 2 scriptures: Rev 2:9 & Rev 3:9.
Romans 11 explains it quite nicely. 2 kinds of "Jews" - those who oppose Christ and those who have accepted the Messiah. The "Israel of God" is the Church - comprised of believing Jews and Gentiles. Unbelieving "Jews" are the broken off branches. They can be grafted back in - IF they believe. Gentiles are grafted in "amongst" the believing Jews. There's plenty of room on the olive tree!
AI formulates a query based on a user request. The search engine returns a ranked list of results (web pages, news, images, etc.). AI then extracts, summarizes, or synthesizes the relevant content to present a response.
So just like search engines are biased therefore so are AI responses. So the idea that AI will be "subverted as time goes on" is simply not correct. AI responses are already "subverted".
That being said I STILL use AI as a research tool in the same manner I use search engines. I realize that both search engines and AI can be biased. It depends on the subject matter.
For example, if search engines are biased towards a certain topic (COVID, COVID vaccines for example) then I expect AI to also have the same bias towards the topic/subject.
It's the old adage: garbage in, garbage out.
Here's a good example: I was preparing to teach my adult Sunday school class as we study the book of Acts. I'm teaching from the 20th chapter. I asked AI to develop a lesson handout using a question & answer format. AI developed the handout in less than 20 seconds. Now I ALREADY knew what Luke was trying to convey in the Acts 20. And I ALREADY knew what questions & answers should be covered in the handout. I didn't just BLINDLY accept what an AI query had given me. I REVIEWED the AI response. It accurately reflected what I already knew about Acts 20. No surprises.
How? Ivermectin was prescribed at military hospitals and clinics for parasitic outbreaks in the past. Same holds true for hydroxychloroquine. It was used by the military health care system for malaria treatment, autoimmune diseases and inflammatory conditions. The military's use of Ivermectin goes back to 2017. Hydroxychloroquine use in the military goes back to the 40's & 50's.
Remember DJT mentioned using Hydroxcholoroquine as a treatment (even a "vaccine") for COVID. For his efforts he was laughed to scorn.
You shouldn't trust AI just like you shouldn't trust search engines - at least not blindly! We are in the midst of an information war. There are lies mixed in with the truth all over the internet. Some websites can be trusted and some can't. Who to believe?
I think the answer lies in which websites line up the closest with Biblical truth.
I trust AI just like I trust search engines. Which means I DON'T blindly follow/believe anything I get from either AI or search engines. They are both just tools that I use for research.
What I'm finding with AI is that it's critical to ask the right question or questions? My understanding is that AI is basically reviewing the 1st 5 or 10 results from common search engines (google, etc). Then it gives you a summary of the results. Since search engines are certainly biased that means that AI will also be biased. It all depends on the subject matter.
Possible with Small Nuclear Reactors: Small modular nuclear reactors are a promising long-term solution for powering energy-intensive AI data centers because they offer:
24/7 base-load power
Low carbon emissions
Modular scalability
From the Jewish Telegraph: "Randy Find formerly attended a Conservative Jewish synagogue in Melbourne, Florida.
After disagreements with that synagogue over internal issues, he became affiliated with a local Chabad-Lubavitch center, whose rabbi officiated his mother’s funeral.
His Jewish identity plays a role in his public life, including advocacy against antisemitism and for pro-Israel policies.
In some contexts, Fine has publicly worn a kippah and emphasized his Jewish heritage while defending Jewish communities from antisemitism and advocating for strong U.S.–Israel relations."
Catch that "Chabad-Lubavitch"! Now that's very telling isn't it? What does it mean to be associated with the "Chabad-Lubavitch" sect of Judaism? Go down that rabbit hole - if you dare!
The second is defined as:
The duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom.
This definition was adopted in 1967 by the International System of Units (SI).