All tools of war must be self-sufficient. Energy infrastructure must be extended to provide for AI datacenters without driving the cost of energy up
Impossible. You either pay $$$ to upgrade the infrastructure, then more money is charged to recoup costs. Living near a data center will always drive your costs up, because the data center has a massive energy draw.
They are referring to on-site power generation - via Natural Gas, Blue and Green Hydrogen, Hydro, Geo-thermal, and Nuclear. It will not leverage the broader power distribution systems - unless tied in as an energy PRODUCER for the consumer, where excess generation capacity is sold into the grid to bring down overall power costs. Data Centers of the future will be stand alone power generation facilities.
Possible with Small Nuclear Reactors: Small modular nuclear reactors are a promising long-term solution for powering energy-intensive AI data centers because they offer:
Well, the tunnel boring machines ("subterrenes"), not available tous simple goy, were about as compact and could power an aircraft carrier according to Phil Schneider. I'll let you "dig" on that "rabbit hole" yourself!
Im assuming somewhere buried in a bill or EO is something requiring “new tech” “energy hogs” to produce their own energy. I’d be interested to know if any of you smooth brains have seen something in writing requiring it.?.? Seeing that would reassure a few stocks I’m in!
If that is legit then something the size of a car trunk could easily produce the power needed for a data center. Hell,,, it could probably take care of a city the size of Dallas!
I believe something like this exists, but I doubt it will be released on society anytime soon. Not because it’s being hidden, but because of the effect it will have on the energy sect in general.
At some point that type of thing will be implemented, but it will be slowly phased in after the energy sector has had plenty of time to transition in a new direction. At least that’s what I hope happens!
Here’s a simpler explanation in plain language(chatgpt):
The video talks about why the U.S. military needs to change how it uses artificial intelligence. Right now, progress is slow because of too much paperwork and red tape. The video argues that this is dangerous and that the military must move faster to stay safe and competitive.
It highlights five main ideas:
Move faster when developing and using AI.
Cut through bureaucracy so decisions don’t take so long.
Use more computing power to support advanced AI systems.
Bring in top tech experts from the private sector.
Use AI responsibly, but in a way that clearly supports military goals and follows the law.
The video is mainly for people who work in defense, government, technology, or policy. It explains how the government can adopt AI more quickly while still staying legal, ethical, and focused on getting the mission done.
There's fantasy book by Terry Brooks about that. It was a nightmare world after a nuclear holocaust and the only sentient being was the living library.
For all the AI haters out there, humanity has been enslaved by the cabal for millennium.
It is only now, at the dawn of AI, that they're getting their ass kicked.
I think Q has access to an unbelievably powerful AI system that is probably the same thing that Sydney Powell referred to as the "Kraken".
Imagine the hundreds of thousands of guilty parties, from all the sealed indictments to everyone they employed, all the Open Society fuckery from George Soros, the trillions of dollars wasted through USAID, all the hogs feeding at the trough around the DC area ... imagine trying to assemble evidence against all those assholes manually. Probably impossible.
Q says they have it all, I think the Kraken is what has soothed out all the guilty parties and is popping out nice, neat and well organized dossiers on everyone who played the game. They're all fucked, from the highest level down to the peons running fake ballots and all the doctors getting unethical covid payments, etc. etc.
Without AI justice could never be served on everyone involved.
Those were programs that directly interfaced, and only did, what a human wanted. AI will allow a program to take actions without human involvement, other than the system setup prior to flipping the "run" switch.
I don’t like AI at all and don’t want to know how it works, I believe it is our worst enemy sadly. I am very scared of how people are going to use it, AI is a devil itself. That’s my opinion.
Many people strongly suspect that our voting machines can be arranged to provide erroneous election results so elections can be rigged. They think that way even though they do not know exactly how such machines are programmed.
As someone involved in IT for many years, I can see that any computer system can be rigged in more ways that you could possibly imagine so my rule would be to never trust a computer.
Then we had Internet search engines that were computer programs rigged to provide the "right" answers first so that people would be swept up in the approved narrative.
Now we are to start trusting AI? Really? Just like the search engines, they will start out OK and then, when people realise the $billions to be made out of rigging them, they will be subverted just like all the preceding computer systems. Do we never learn?
I trust AI just like I trust search engines. Which means I DON'T blindly follow/believe anything I get from either AI or search engines. They are both just tools that I use for research.
What I'm finding with AI is that it's critical to ask the right question or questions? My understanding is that AI is basically reviewing the 1st 5 or 10 results from common search engines (google, etc). Then it gives you a summary of the results. Since search engines are certainly biased that means that AI will also be biased. It all depends on the subject matter.
Just like the search engines, they will start out OK and then, when people realise the $billions to be made out of rigging them, they will be subverted just like all the preceding computer systems
Thats already happened, we are well into the subversion despite being only 4-5 years in this AI mess (AI has been around longer, but it really only became mainstream and economical in the past 5 years)
I don’t trust AI at all, but sometimes you must fight fire with fire. If something can be used for evil, and we know AI can, it seems like a possible solution is an AI that is not programmed for evil.
You shouldn't trust AI just like you shouldn't trust search engines - at least not blindly! We are in the midst of an information war. There are lies mixed in with the truth all over the internet. Some websites can be trusted and some can't. Who to believe?
I think the answer lies in which websites line up the closest with Biblical truth.
I know a retired Navy officer who have been in the Navy for long time. He said POTUS picked a really good one. I asked him how he know because Pete shouldn't be in his age group. He said being in the Navy that long, you hear things. He said he knows Pete and he is excellent.
Quick story about vets and their communications channels. My uncle was Air Force, somehow he got word to NOT take the covid vax, he was mid 70s at the time, told my mom not to take it, to use ivermectin instead. This was right before the vax was released. We’re all anti-vax anyway, but how in the hell did he know about ivermectin?
How? Ivermectin was prescribed at military hospitals and clinics for parasitic outbreaks in the past. Same holds true for hydroxychloroquine. It was used by the military health care system for malaria treatment, autoimmune diseases and inflammatory conditions. The military's use of Ivermectin goes back to 2017. Hydroxychloroquine use in the military goes back to the 40's & 50's.
Remember DJT mentioned using Hydroxcholoroquine as a treatment (even a "vaccine") for COVID. For his efforts he was laughed to scorn.
Not sure how I feel about this. He’s going to the enemy to get MORE worthless AI? Microsoft? Google? More data centers mean more water diversion for cooling. More and more land used for huge data centers now on military owned land? Bringing the enemy into the camp? Haven’t we done enough of that? More techno garbage, more and more? Look at AMAZON and Meta. Farmland destroyed by data centers. Is he going to build farmland on top of the data roofs? Recycle the water over the roofs and then sell contaminated crops to the locals?
Small modular nuclear reactors are a promising long-term solution for powering energy-intensive AI data centers because they offer: 24/7 baseload power; Low carbon emissions & Modular scalability.
great point, how do we know AI does not have corruption intended, and then there’s AI errors. AI still has ghosting, Ed Dowd on CapitalCosm on youtube this past week thinks AI is still not ready for full reliance as it has a too high percentage of anomalies & errors.
I think AI will start out being honest then it will gradually become subverted as time goes by - just like, say, Google.
What might AI decide about vaccines, for instance? If someone were to realise that by spending a few $billion they could make $trillions over time do you think they would not try?
We already see how science is subverted. People find many reasons not to publish science papers that do not follow the approved narrative. Just ask the climate scientists. If AI were to be fed just the climate hoax papers and not the balancing ones with the other view then they would be effectively rigged.
AI formulates a query based on a user request. The search engine returns a ranked list of results (web pages, news, images, etc.). AI then extracts, summarizes, or synthesizes the relevant content to present a response.
So just like search engines are biased therefore so are AI responses. So the idea that AI will be "subverted as time goes on" is simply not correct. AI responses are already "subverted".
That being said I STILL use AI as a research tool in the same manner I use search engines. I realize that both search engines and AI can be biased. It depends on the subject matter.
For example, if search engines are biased towards a certain topic (COVID, COVID vaccines for example) then I expect AI to also have the same bias towards the topic/subject.
It's the old adage: garbage in, garbage out.
Here's a good example: I was preparing to teach my adult Sunday school class as we study the book of Acts. I'm teaching from the 20th chapter. I asked AI to develop a lesson handout using a question & answer format. AI developed the handout in less than 20 seconds. Now I ALREADY knew what Luke was trying to convey in the Acts 20. And I ALREADY knew what questions & answers should be covered in the handout. I didn't just BLINDLY accept what an AI query had given me. I REVIEWED the AI response. It accurately reflected what I already knew about Acts 20. No surprises.
In English please.
AI is a tool of war
All tools of must be unrestrained by ideological impairments.
All bureaucratic blockers for military action must be done away with.
All tools of war must be self-sufficient. Energy infrastructure must be extended to provide for AI datacenters without driving the cost of energy up.
That's what I took away from it.
"Turn on skynet"
Exactly where my mind went. I have to say.
yea I don't like what this is saying.... IF that's what he is saying, cuz I haven't actually watched this yet.
I KEEP SAYING "Terminator" people, TERMINATOR.
Lol.
And I'm too old to be Sarah Connor
🤣👌
Nice catch
YW... excellent bullet points RI! 👏
We've been implementing AI for military strategies for longer than AI has been public
I'll bet...
Impossible. You either pay $$$ to upgrade the infrastructure, then more money is charged to recoup costs. Living near a data center will always drive your costs up, because the data center has a massive energy draw.
Edit: may have spoken too soon
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ARwUb04u2/president-trump-announces-he-is-/c/
They are referring to on-site power generation - via Natural Gas, Blue and Green Hydrogen, Hydro, Geo-thermal, and Nuclear. It will not leverage the broader power distribution systems - unless tied in as an energy PRODUCER for the consumer, where excess generation capacity is sold into the grid to bring down overall power costs. Data Centers of the future will be stand alone power generation facilities.
Yup
Possible with Small Nuclear Reactors: Small modular nuclear reactors are a promising long-term solution for powering energy-intensive AI data centers because they offer:
24/7 base-load power
Low carbon emissions
Modular scalability
Naquadah Generators!? LOL
TMTG and (TAE? Cant remember the company they are partnering with) is working on exactly the kind of small, modular nuclear reactors mentioned
Exactly what I’m dreaming of
Well, the tunnel boring machines ("subterrenes"), not available tous simple goy, were about as compact and could power an aircraft carrier according to Phil Schneider. I'll let you "dig" on that "rabbit hole" yourself!
'Big Foot' generators, wow all natural & powerful. 😂🤣
Unless the data center has an independent power source. Come out of the dark ages my friend. It's awesome here
Just repeating what SecWar Hegseth said.
What’s the turnaround time on SMRs, 2 or 3 yrs???
Im assuming somewhere buried in a bill or EO is something requiring “new tech” “energy hogs” to produce their own energy. I’d be interested to know if any of you smooth brains have seen something in writing requiring it.?.? Seeing that would reassure a few stocks I’m in!
Also,,,, there’s this👇🏼
UAP Power Generator (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190295733A1/en)
*Look up “Pais Effect”
If that is legit then something the size of a car trunk could easily produce the power needed for a data center. Hell,,, it could probably take care of a city the size of Dallas!
I believe something like this exists, but I doubt it will be released on society anytime soon. Not because it’s being hidden, but because of the effect it will have on the energy sect in general.
At some point that type of thing will be implemented, but it will be slowly phased in after the energy sector has had plenty of time to transition in a new direction. At least that’s what I hope happens!
Here’s a simpler explanation in plain language(chatgpt):
The video talks about why the U.S. military needs to change how it uses artificial intelligence. Right now, progress is slow because of too much paperwork and red tape. The video argues that this is dangerous and that the military must move faster to stay safe and competitive.
It highlights five main ideas:
The video is mainly for people who work in defense, government, technology, or policy. It explains how the government can adopt AI more quickly while still staying legal, ethical, and focused on getting the mission done.
I wouldn't count on that.
Thx Fren 🐸
Which is why Hegseth met with Musk yesterday.
I’d rather a military AI work with Musk than Microsoft and Google. The gang is back together.
I only understand the part about removing blocks and using AI.
It is simple BD. Remove all block of common sense and allow AI to take over the world! Kek
On July 22, 2026, the system will become self aware (to be read in the Terminator voice) :)
July 22 if not before. Maybe already is! Kek
There's fantasy book by Terry Brooks about that. It was a nightmare world after a nuclear holocaust and the only sentient being was the living library.
Shannara?
I am not sure. I think it's Mogawr or something like that. It's good.
It is written in another Book I read every day! :0
You mean the Bible?
Yup. Anything good for humanity is blocked by government beauracracy intentionally. Time to kick it into gear with a decent AI.
Many people are fearful of AI. I used to be afraid of computer also.
AI could work, but it's screening out the "compromised" ones that are difficult. I heard Brighteon AI is good, but haven't had time to check.
Replace compromised lawyers with AI after getting rid of all the election twisting laws, and we might be on to something.
Now, you just gave me something to go look
Lol lol lol 😆 🤣 😂
For all the AI haters out there, humanity has been enslaved by the cabal for millennium.
It is only now, at the dawn of AI, that they're getting their ass kicked.
I think Q has access to an unbelievably powerful AI system that is probably the same thing that Sydney Powell referred to as the "Kraken".
Imagine the hundreds of thousands of guilty parties, from all the sealed indictments to everyone they employed, all the Open Society fuckery from George Soros, the trillions of dollars wasted through USAID, all the hogs feeding at the trough around the DC area ... imagine trying to assemble evidence against all those assholes manually. Probably impossible.
Q says they have it all, I think the Kraken is what has soothed out all the guilty parties and is popping out nice, neat and well organized dossiers on everyone who played the game. They're all fucked, from the highest level down to the peons running fake ballots and all the doctors getting unethical covid payments, etc. etc.
Without AI justice could never be served on everyone involved.
Those were programs that directly interfaced, and only did, what a human wanted. AI will allow a program to take actions without human involvement, other than the system setup prior to flipping the "run" switch.
"AI is being framed as the new invisible threat, or boogie man that's to be feared."
All I'm seeing is that AI is being hailed as the new god that will lead us from the Deep State to the Promised Land.
Everything can be used for good or bad. Water is a simple thing, you can drown.
Why I said brain-dead need all the help I can get. I use AI.
I don’t like AI at all and don’t want to know how it works, I believe it is our worst enemy sadly. I am very scared of how people are going to use it, AI is a devil itself. That’s my opinion.
AI is just a supercomputer. Nothing more.
Its "magic" and impressiveness is nothing more than being able to complete complex or large calculations quickly.
AI is NOT:
Alive
Sentient / a conscious entity
able to freely "think"
able to CREATE (only mimic and recombine existing examples of work/art)
able to "program itself"
do anything that its human programmers haven't told it to do
going to take your turn (we're not renting it shoes ...)
I wonder what Sarah Conner would have to say about that. Hehe, couldn't resist🐸
Well, we weren't exactly on a great timeline. Look at all the A-holes we had in charge of nuclear weapons for example. AI's don't do pedo games.
Sometimes we never learn.
Many people strongly suspect that our voting machines can be arranged to provide erroneous election results so elections can be rigged. They think that way even though they do not know exactly how such machines are programmed.
As someone involved in IT for many years, I can see that any computer system can be rigged in more ways that you could possibly imagine so my rule would be to never trust a computer.
Then we had Internet search engines that were computer programs rigged to provide the "right" answers first so that people would be swept up in the approved narrative.
Now we are to start trusting AI? Really? Just like the search engines, they will start out OK and then, when people realise the $billions to be made out of rigging them, they will be subverted just like all the preceding computer systems. Do we never learn?
I bet someones or someone is benefiting from it, that’s my first thought.
I trust AI just like I trust search engines. Which means I DON'T blindly follow/believe anything I get from either AI or search engines. They are both just tools that I use for research.
What I'm finding with AI is that it's critical to ask the right question or questions? My understanding is that AI is basically reviewing the 1st 5 or 10 results from common search engines (google, etc). Then it gives you a summary of the results. Since search engines are certainly biased that means that AI will also be biased. It all depends on the subject matter.
Thats already happened, we are well into the subversion despite being only 4-5 years in this AI mess (AI has been around longer, but it really only became mainstream and economical in the past 5 years)
I don’t trust AI at all, but sometimes you must fight fire with fire. If something can be used for evil, and we know AI can, it seems like a possible solution is an AI that is not programmed for evil.
You shouldn't trust AI just like you shouldn't trust search engines - at least not blindly! We are in the midst of an information war. There are lies mixed in with the truth all over the internet. Some websites can be trusted and some can't. Who to believe?
I think the answer lies in which websites line up the closest with Biblical truth.
Yep, it is going to be biblical.
—-I think the answer lies in which websites line up the closest with Biblical truth.— Amen.
"I am very scared of how people are going to use it,"
Yes. Therein lies the danger. AI itself is just another type of progroamming. But the humans who use it are no more trustworthy than anyone else.
WOW they are FORNSICALLY cleaning house, and INSTALLING the Best and Brightest. ( Probably done already, but who cares, its happen...)
I know a retired Navy officer who have been in the Navy for long time. He said POTUS picked a really good one. I asked him how he know because Pete shouldn't be in his age group. He said being in the Navy that long, you hear things. He said he knows Pete and he is excellent.
Quick story about vets and their communications channels. My uncle was Air Force, somehow he got word to NOT take the covid vax, he was mid 70s at the time, told my mom not to take it, to use ivermectin instead. This was right before the vax was released. We’re all anti-vax anyway, but how in the hell did he know about ivermectin?
How? Ivermectin was prescribed at military hospitals and clinics for parasitic outbreaks in the past. Same holds true for hydroxychloroquine. It was used by the military health care system for malaria treatment, autoimmune diseases and inflammatory conditions. The military's use of Ivermectin goes back to 2017. Hydroxychloroquine use in the military goes back to the 40's & 50's.
Remember DJT mentioned using Hydroxcholoroquine as a treatment (even a "vaccine") for COVID. For his efforts he was laughed to scorn.
— Ivermectin was prescribed at military hospitals and clinics for parasitic outbreaks in the past.— I didn’t know that. Thanks for sharing :)
Yep - even more so for HCQ! That drug has been prescribed by the military since the 40s/50s.
I thought they were all forced to take including the veterans and retirees? He certainly got advance knowledge.
I was in WA state then and my business partner runs an apothecary. We were all saying things like, We can take care of this without a shot.
LOL
I think Pete is excellent. How about that?
yes, he is.
I think I might break something tonight
I'm like a chainsaw... I'll skin your ass raw...
LOL
Not sure how I feel about this. He’s going to the enemy to get MORE worthless AI? Microsoft? Google? More data centers mean more water diversion for cooling. More and more land used for huge data centers now on military owned land? Bringing the enemy into the camp? Haven’t we done enough of that? More techno garbage, more and more? Look at AMAZON and Meta. Farmland destroyed by data centers. Is he going to build farmland on top of the data roofs? Recycle the water over the roofs and then sell contaminated crops to the locals?
one word: Greenland
I have no idea.
If anyone here has followed what Icke has been saying for about 15 yrs now, this tracks.
What did he say?
I wonder if chainsaw is comms for cutting through red tape?
Javier Meilie used one for some campaign or victory video iirc
Remember Elon with chainsaw? Maybe just AI.
Small modular nuclear reactors are a promising long-term solution for powering energy-intensive AI data centers because they offer: 24/7 baseload power; Low carbon emissions & Modular scalability.
Heard about that too.
Finally. The only reason that competitors could stay close was the slow pace of the process and red tape.
Don't forget corruption
great point, how do we know AI does not have corruption intended, and then there’s AI errors. AI still has ghosting, Ed Dowd on CapitalCosm on youtube this past week thinks AI is still not ready for full reliance as it has a too high percentage of anomalies & errors.
I think AI will start out being honest then it will gradually become subverted as time goes by - just like, say, Google.
What might AI decide about vaccines, for instance? If someone were to realise that by spending a few $billion they could make $trillions over time do you think they would not try?
We already see how science is subverted. People find many reasons not to publish science papers that do not follow the approved narrative. Just ask the climate scientists. If AI were to be fed just the climate hoax papers and not the balancing ones with the other view then they would be effectively rigged.
Require truth in the questions you ask AI.
AI formulates a query based on a user request. The search engine returns a ranked list of results (web pages, news, images, etc.). AI then extracts, summarizes, or synthesizes the relevant content to present a response.
So just like search engines are biased therefore so are AI responses. So the idea that AI will be "subverted as time goes on" is simply not correct. AI responses are already "subverted".
That being said I STILL use AI as a research tool in the same manner I use search engines. I realize that both search engines and AI can be biased. It depends on the subject matter.
For example, if search engines are biased towards a certain topic (COVID, COVID vaccines for example) then I expect AI to also have the same bias towards the topic/subject.
It's the old adage: garbage in, garbage out.
Here's a good example: I was preparing to teach my adult Sunday school class as we study the book of Acts. I'm teaching from the 20th chapter. I asked AI to develop a lesson handout using a question & answer format. AI developed the handout in less than 20 seconds. Now I ALREADY knew what Luke was trying to convey in the Acts 20. And I ALREADY knew what questions & answers should be covered in the handout. I didn't just BLINDLY accept what an AI query had given me. I REVIEWED the AI response. It accurately reflected what I already knew about Acts 20. No surprises.
some good thoughts you wrote, so as the field of science has its biases based on who has the power to fund the “approved” science,
so I think AI has some biases, but as you wrote AI has a sense of honesty to it that could be corrupted over time
Good point.