6
Rubieroo 6 points ago +6 / -0

If not for intervention I believe they were to also be used for targeted bioweapons.

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Marc Elias said his dog Chloe died. His dog's name is Bodie. Dogs are used by the Deep State symbolically to communicate. When GHW Bush died, first we knew of it was about a month prior when it was announced (by Comey IIRC) that there had been a dog death. They kept that profane old coot on ice until they needed an event to cancel whatever Q had planned for December 5th - so a state funeral was the event. Q responded "well played, Deep State. Allow us to counter". The counter was apparently in those mysterious envelopes.

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just IMO: the movie was kinda boring and fairly retarded. I like Tom Holland and what's-his bucket, but I'd give this movie a solid NOPE.

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

The ones that will go through civil courts might take a while, and we do not know how far along that process is. The military tribunals, however, can be completed in hours. Example: McCain. Tried, sentenced, executed in one day.

17
Rubieroo 17 points ago +17 / -0

Each case COULD be a RICO case. Each case could contain multiple sealed indictments, upwards of a hundred. Durham is not the only one ;)

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unless they have a Tweetiebird speech impediment and meant to say "rooms"

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

No man wants a uterus anyways (except delusional crazy men who wish they had one).

Democrats should start wearing uterus hats! Maybe they can repurpose those ridiculous pink hats from 5 years ago? Glue a little dismembered baby doll on the top.

3
Rubieroo 3 points ago +3 / -0

All Your Uterus Belong To Us? We should have a contest to try and MAKE it funny.

1
Rubieroo 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the woman in the water is supposed to be a left wing abortion activist, we need to make her fat, purple haired, and ugly.

4
Rubieroo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Men don't really go around even saying the word "uterus".

3
Rubieroo 3 points ago +3 / -0

^ Agre with everything you said.

A Christian friend of mine was puzzled recently about whether or not she should attend the "wedding" of a family member - a "marriage" between two women. She felt like, because it was such an important event she should go even though she diagrees with gay marriage.

So I asked the Lord, "What about that? I know not to support this, and I know it's sin, but how do YOU see this thing of marriages between two people of the same sex?"

He answered that marriage was created and ordained by Him. Anything that goes outside the boundaries of what He created is not a marriage no matter what anyone says. So there IS no "important event". There IS no marriage.

5
Rubieroo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just my opinion based on what I've seen - I knew one powerful (in the faith sense) huge church back in the 80's. It was spiritually ALIVE and you could feel the Holy Spirit the moment you walked in the door. It was a big part of the Jesus movement - lots of hippies.

Since then the large churches I've been to are mostly like well-oiled social clubs. Since I like hanging out with Christians, I do like that one aspect of them. You can find God wherever you seek Him (since He is everywhere) so I can enjoy being there, but the corporation aspect is problematic. Many things are done to preserve the existence and finances of the corporation, and decisions are sometimes made based on what is best for the corporation and not "whatever is God's will". I cannot support that. I have found that there is very little spiritual power in those massive places. Plenty of people in them that love the Lord, but...they're all babies in a way.

I love small groups or even just hanging out with groups of Christians (because Jesus did say that wherever two or more are gathered in His name, He will be there in the midst).

6
Rubieroo 6 points ago +6 / -0

I do believe that the Rothschilds crossed some kind of line. Jan 15, 2021 a Rothschild heir dropped dead at the age of 57. Benjamin. They don't generally die at that age....This whole time I have thought that if they break a rule and hit one of ours? We hit one of theirs.

Lynne DeForester Rothschild was terrified of Q. Q told her "don't ever come here again" (of 8chan) and she deleted her entire social media profile the next day. As Trump said "F around and find out" XD

My conclusion: they're all gonna die if they're not dead already. The reason I think some might already be dead? "You're watching a movie" - Q Q laid out a timeline: 1st: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population 2nd: shifting the narrative 3rd: removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success 4th: defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes 5th: freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities,

and critically -

5th KILL OFF CHAIN OF COMMAND to prevent top-down comms/org

5
Rubieroo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also give this a read: Behold a Pale Horse by Bill Cooper (or William Cooper on some platforms). #782 ...Q said of that book: "BIG!"

4
Rubieroo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well they ARE in Hollyweird, so no surprises there.

Enty did me a solid once when a total predator was targeting a very famous minor (connected to a friend). I asked Enty to post anything he knew about it - forcing it into the light and forcing the parents to take action - and he did. The "relationship" instantly ended.

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

While they are also killing birds left and right. Time to stock up on chickens?

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just BUZZIN' the ground after that barrel roll - never flew a plane before? Whole thing was hysterical! WELL DONE, WHITE HATS! His fake family were pretty good fun too - it almost looked like they were struggling not to laugh.

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

The two women that come to mind are Gabby Petito and Ashli Babbitt. Richard Russell was an entirely fictitious character, complete with a fictitious family.

1
Rubieroo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Instagram was the one that surprised me. They're ALL on there constantly - it just happens that insta is always pushed onto FB so there's an overlap whether or not anyone wants to see all that stuff.

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't either, but covering up evidence is another option. On the whole though I think they're just destroying the food supply. We already know the food is crap and processed stuff is toxic, but I am sure it would surprise no one here if nefarious deep staters would selectively poison the food supply. Not all poisons work instantaneously either, so the argument that bad food would cause an uproar and immediately be flagged might not be relevant.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›