2
SassyLass 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for replying. This site doesn’t work well for searching for me because I am strictly iPhone based. I did get in the computer at work and was able to retrieve your information. Thanks again!

2
SassyLass 2 points ago +2 / -0

No offense ment here, but we kicked Englands ass and kept our guns! If you join us perhaps our 2A will keep you better prepared for the globalist fight. And yea. You do beat our ases in hockey, most of the time!

1
SassyLass 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you remember that also? Something about this talk about Canada and Greenland reminded me of that discussion way back then. Unfortunately, I wasn’t really paying that much attention then :-/

1
SassyLass 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for an excellent reply - you are much smarter in this than I am. I just had a jingle in my brain about a concept of the one world government bringing our governance into four distinct regional/global political organizations. See my newest text for my query about it to Grok. I am not smart enough to really understand, but do appreciate those who can discuss it..

1
SassyLass 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get that! But I’m just reaching back to hearing how a one world government would be devised into four regional continental units. See my newest text after I “grok’d” the query.

4
SassyLass 4 points ago +4 / -0

So then my question is why is Trump even joking about annexing Canada? And buying Greenland? Wouldn’t this be remotely construed as unifying for a NAU?

1
SassyLass 1 point ago +1 / -0

I decided to Grok it …

“ The concept of a "North American Union" (NAU) as part of a broader one-world government plan is largely a subject of conspiracy theories rather than official policy. Here's an overview based on available information:

  • Conceptual Origins: The idea of a North American Union is often compared to the European Union, suggesting a political and economic union of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. This concept has been discussed in academic circles and by some think tanks, but there is no official governmental plan to establish such a union. Publications like the Council on Foreign Relations' 2005 report titled "Building a North American Community" have been cited by conspiracy theorists as evidence, but these reports discuss increased cooperation rather than a political merger.

  • Conspiracy Theories: Many conspiracy theories claim that the NAU is part of a "New World Order" or a one-world government agenda. These theories often involve claims of secret agreements to dissolve national borders, introduce a common currency like the "Amero," and centralize governance, essentially eroding national sovereignty. These ideas are propagated through various media, including social media platforms like X, where users discuss fears of losing national identity and autonomy.

  • Official Stance: Government officials from the United States, Canada, and Mexico have repeatedly stated there are no plans for a North American Union. The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), which was active from 2005 until it was discontinued in 2009, was often misconstrued by conspiracy theorists as a step towards a union, but it was aimed at cooperation in security and economic matters without any intention of forming a political union.

  • Public and Political Perception: The concept of a NAU has been politically contentious, with some politicians and public figures using it as a rallying cry against globalization or to incite fears of loss of sovereignty. However, these discussions generally remain within the realm of political rhetoric or speculative fiction rather than actual policy implementation.

  • Economic Integration vs. Political Union: While there is significant economic integration through agreements like NAFTA (now USMCA), this does not equate to plans for a political union. The focus has been on trade liberalization and economic cooperation, not on forming a single government across these nations.

In summary, while the concept of a North American Union exists in theoretical and speculative discussions, there is no concrete, official plan for its creation as part of a one-world government initiative. The narratives around this often stem from conspiracy theories rather than from factual policy announcements or agreements.”

2
SassyLass 2 points ago +2 / -0

🙏 I will try on my laptop when I am off work. Don’t want to search now while I’m there 😅. (Catholic Hospital).

3
SassyLass 3 points ago +3 / -0

For more background:

My MIL was diagnosed with colorectal cancer near her anus last spring. She didn’t trust trying anything but what her cancer doc wanted which was the traditional radiation and chemo.

She is now willing to try anything before surgery which would leave her with a colostomy bag for the rest of her life.

I personally think she should just go this route anyway and get rid of the bulk of the mass and then continue on with the Tippen plus ivermectin protocol. Just need to know more about dosages and other peoples experience here.

1
SassyLass 1 point ago +1 / -0

The forum is now open to discussion. Let’s figure this out and get it trending :-)

1
SassyLass 1 point ago +1 / -0

That works too. Which ever we all decide, we need to start the push as a team of frogs!

3
SassyLass 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m surprised they haven’t “stopped” Mercola - he is smart. But they just put him in the “wacky conspiracy” category so far.

3
SassyLass 3 points ago +3 / -0

Am I the only one here who thinks this looks contrived? And a set up to buy a ready cam? Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure they are invaluable, but this looks fake to me and a potential marketing ploy, even without mentioning the company name?Am I so super sensitive to marketing ploys???

2
SassyLass 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I noticed that first thing. Not sure what to think about him wearing it. But him being so open about having killed his predator is interesting. And the fact he went to jail for it. Not sure what to think :-/

1
SassyLass 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope that the presidential election is beyond cheating and the rest of the country lives through the mayhem that results afterwards, and vote MAGA in 26 and again in 28 - and beyond!

1
SassyLass 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are we posting YouTube links? YouTube wants me to sign in. No thanks!

view more: Next ›