They almost certainly have their own biolabs, and are likely working with these biolabs. They are definitely not clean in this. But in this case, they're more-or-less stating the obvious, just with a few extra details. There was no way that the secret biolabs in Ukraine were the only secret biolabs.
The questions that should be asked now should include "How does China know this?", "Is this information true?", and "What does China (and every other country) have to do with this, and how many are other countries like China running on their own?"
This is a pointed finger, as well as an attempt to get ahead of the cart themselves by laying all of the blame, deserved or otherwise, on the US.
That kind of feels like intentional phrasing. As though to say, "If Starlink blocks Russian news sources, know that it wasn't voluntary, and that we were threatened with our lives, and it wasn't the Russians who threatened us.", or something to that effect.
He's setting an ultimatum and a flag that wouldn't be present if he claimed that he would never do it, even at gunpoint.
This feels like a trap, for those who would shut down free speech.
So my parents were lost on this narrative when Tucker started repeating the video of the armored vehicle ran over the civilian car the other night. I fully expect that things are being intentionally hidden, but I don't know how that fits into this narrative, either.
I hate the '24 narrative, and I'm not saying to drop 2020 in any way. At the same time, life isn't going to stop just because we don't want to participate. The '21 elections are still going to have consequences, so are the '22 and the '24 elections.
2020 is still being pushed, and it still needs to be pushed harder, but unless you know of a way to shut down elections indefinitely until 2020 can be resolved, refusing to participate at all is just being counterproductive.
They had to cheat hard in 2020, and they were extremely obvious about it. The thing is, they didn't just want to win, they wanted to demoralize us going forward; the less blatantly they have to cheat, the better it is for them, because the less people will realize the truth.
If you stop voting, you're just playing into their hands, because then they don't have to work so hard and be so obvious when cheating. The more opportunities we have to expose them, the better.
The elections aren't just going to stop because people stop showing up - millions upon millions don't show up to vote in most elections in the first place. Boycotting the elections won't accomplish anything productive, it will only make it easier for them by setting the bar that much lower. You're better off continuing to participate, proving another set of eyes and ears, and helping to continue to put pressure on the system, until it can be exposed to as many people as possible.
Alright, so say that the population is wiped out via vaccine apocalypse, nuclear holocaust, or whatever, and that whatever remnant survivors take these stones as gospel. Are they supposed to keep a tally of the population and then, once that population reaches five hundred million, are they they supposed to start killing off the overflow? Is that supposed to be a better interpretation? This is what you would ask of the survivors of a near genocide?
According these stones, we are significantly out balance with nature already. Billions would have to die to reach this ideal, and incase you aren't aware, there are some in power who have openly advocated for depopulation already. If these "ideals" are to be met, then what difference does it make for the people before or after the significant depopulation? At the point that the "survivors" find them, significant depopulation would have already occurred.
That's my point. She apparently hasn't question anything. Now would be a good opportunity to teach her. I'm saying to be ready to find a new job regardless, but at least try to use this moment to tell her why you won't take the vaccine. Simply getting angry and taking your ball home doesn't do anything productive, aside from removing you from the situation altogether.
That might depend, honestly. They clearly haven't taken the time to question why people wouldn't want the vaccine. If she's open to listening, then this might be a valuable teaching moment for her. That's lost if you quit anyway.
It doesn't hurt to put more irons in the fire if she's unwilling to listen, but just storming out in anger after she's already backtracked may not be the wisest decision.
Wouldn't Trump be closer to Hohenheim than either Bradley or Scar?
The face and the representative of the fallen and the anonymous who are striving to save the world from the one who would consume God and assume his place?
The Celestial Dragons can't be anything but the satanic Masons. They're at the head of the world and above reproach, free to kill, torture, and enslave anyone they want and at their whim.
They're the "descendants of the creators of the World", and have complete control over the World Government and the Marines. Even the kings and rulers of the individual nations that make up the World Government are subservient the them.
The only difference is that they are completely open with their "superiority" and they don't hide behind symbolism... except for the fact that there's more going on behind the scenes than even they're aware of.
Anime can be a fair bit deeper and more involved than most Western cartoons. Some anime can be childish or irrelevant forms of escapism; shows such as Pokemon and Dragon Ball Z are meant more for immediate enjoyment, for example. There are, however, more than a few series that can go pretty deep, where the stigma of "animated shows are just cartoons" doesn't actually fit.
Full Metal Alchemist: Brotherhood is a good example of this, as it can be pretty philosophical and complex. So can other shows, such as Stein's Gate, and even the "cartoonish" One Piece.
A fair bit of Japanese culture is wrapped up in anime, and over there, it's not just something that's targeted at kids, or shows like The Simpsons or South Park that are just there for a cartoon comedy niche. Anime can get pretty serious fairly easily.
This may be true, but at least he's highlighting it and making an issue out of it, rather than letting it slide out of sight. Whether it's a show to say that "he's doing something but nothing" is a rather subjective question, but what exactly can he do otherwise?
What?
What about "innocent until proven guilty"? How many times have we seen immediate release of names and faces, only for that information to be wrong?
I'm not saying he didn't do it, and that he isn't involved, but if he's just a person of interest - meaning that he hasn't even been arrested yet - then they shouldn't have revealed anything about him, particularly with the state of today's social landscape. If he's innocent, then this incident has made him guilty in the eyes of the public, no matter what comes of this. Everyone should know this, if they'd paid attention to what happens whenever the media fixates on anyone.