It wasn't always like this, but currently QAnon is used by the media for the express purpose of slandering the movement and Q.
We have free will given by God. You can think however you choose to.
Obvious misrepresentation. The population is noticing how bad things are getting, have been for a while. Telling them they're actually secretly winning plays on their hopes even though nothing has improved.
Noticing being the operative word. Nobody knew anything back then, so the timing is stupid. Most people still have absolutely no clue about any of this, and many who do call it a conspiracy theory. All they did was wake us up.
This operation trust narrative is a pile of bullshit. If they wanted controlled OP, it would be solely focused on people in the public sphere telling us all this shit, instead of some random called Q on a forum that hardly anyone actually gives a shit about or listens to.
No it isn't. The fact you and everyone else here takes it for granted that he's on your side is exactly why it's worth it to have him as controlled opposition. You trust politicians. That's why it works. It's crazy that so many people still buy into the uniparty scam.
And it's clear Trump is on our side. At least well enough to reasonably take it as truth. Trump is very clearly not in their party, as you have both sides of the ACTUAL uniparty attacking him and calling him an evil racist who no one should follow. Calling him a bad representation of conservatism. Calling him the death of the Republican Party. They also constantly have hunted him with lawsuits and witch hunts for 6 years. Or did you miss that? He only survives because they have nothing. Because he's squeaky clean. Because he's protected by the military. Otherwise, they would have done him in with their cabal blackmail they have on all their assets in the 2020 election to seal the deal. They didn't, because they can't. Trump is not a politician either. Maybe the worst take in your whole post.
We can? You can't even tell me who your saviors are. Prove it
Jesus Christ is the only savior. Until then, it's plausible that the military has a plan in place to temporality beat back the evil. It makes plenty of sense if you open yourself to hope and close yourself to doom and despair. But it's ok, it's a defense mechanism. Can't accept hope because it would destroy you to be wrong again. Demoralized and apathetic, just like they want you to be.
It's highly relevant. If I wanted my enemies to think they were winning, i would want them to believe in no one in particular and have no time frame. That way it can't be falsified. Saved by someone, sometime, who knows.
I don't know when Jesus is coming back, either. Still going to happen, and that isn't Satan's lie, it's God's promise. While these aren't the exact same, the point is that your point sucks. There's a dozen reasons for doing it like this, yours is but one.
Also, patriots in control doesn't mean they have full and total control of everything that happens. But to compare it to chess, at a certain point you win no matter what. It just becomes a matter of playing the finishing moves. Both sides know it, but neither wants to say it. Doesn't mean the winning side broadcasts their exact play for the other side.
Wouldn't want to take the worst evil on the planet seriously, I guess. Good guys would just take over. If they were "in control," they wouldn't have to kill a bunch of people, due to already being in control. None of it makes any sense.
But they definitely would want to do it in such a way that the brainwashed masses revolt and start a civil war, leading to the mass deaths of potentially millions of Americans in a bloody fight between neighbors, right?
And again, patriots in control doesn't necessarily mean what some around here like to interpret it as meaning.
They also need to all get taken out at once, or they'll just regroup in the shadows and start over. This is about freedom from a 1000s year evil, not just taking one country back for a little bit and playing the endless game of tug of war we've been stuck in.
But you know what? Yes, your theory is possible. Doesn't mean it's true, though. And if you had a shred of intellectual honesty, you'd acknowledge the possibility of truth in the theories presented here as well.
Any examples/links? Makes sense, but have never seen the studies before.
Seems too high to me, maybe 45 multiples?
I'm generally only in support of this for the worst of the worst, but if you threw people in the gulag for peacefully protesting the government, you get the rope, not leniency.
No, it would be stupid as fuck to take a mostly complacent population who had no idea how bad things were, and tell them a bunch of shit on how bad things were just to hopefully make them more complacent when you tell them there's a plan.
And if that's the case, Trump is in on their plan, which itself is a silly idea. They don't attack any of their controlled opposition as hard as they attack Trump and his followers. Trump also gave space to true conservatives and America first people. Why do this when they already had their perfect little two party system with the Dems and the RINOs?
So I think we can reasonably establish that it's not controlled by the bad guys. At that point, we only have to establish whether or not it's true. I think this is also well established, and as such the fact nobody knows the exact timeframe is mostly irrelevant.
It is meant to keep a civil war from happening, though. The good guys in control who are trying to fix shit peacefully first seem to be opposed to bloodshed, you know, as a result of them being the good guys.
One of our analogies is correct. Hopefully we find out soon which one.
Bob Ross made some really garbage fucking paintings from what I've seen...
Then I finished the video and it looked amazing.
Seriously, I'd sit there wondering what the fuck he was doing and how whatever shit he just smeared on the canvass would ever look good. Then he finished it.
No, no, the article is perfectly fine. It's at least two and a HALF sentences long. Much better KEK
Even if he steps down from being in charge, he still owns Twitter.
Think he said he'd go be in charge of some other department while the CEO he hand picks runs the whole thing.
Your point is like looking at a halfway complete painting, calling it shit, and saying it turned out horrible.
The first time never ended.
I still think there are some issues with Twitter, but I'd say it's at least 17 multiples of infinitely better.
I love that statement because he either meant what he said, or he's too senile to speak coherently and was talking about and anti-fraud organization (which then still makes no sense because they made no such organization).
No way for normies to truly reconcile it without sounding like blind followers/total idiots.
It's all good. I was a bit snippy myself.
I can't say I fully understand the feeling, because I have a pretty good temperament when it comes to these evil people who want to impose all manner of terrible things onto us. I'm honestly pretty good at just brushing it off/ignoring it and moving on unaffected. But I absolutely see where someone would be very unhappy/angry with someone wanting to take away their job, life, family, and freedom because they didn't inject themselves with literal poison.
The same goes for the people who don't advocate that, but refuse to denounce it or speak out against those who do. Going along with it is bad, they're basically enabling it, and I absolutely agree those people need to be chastised, and need to apologize in a genuine manner, or be rejected.
I certainly don't see any godliness in forgiving those who refuse to acknowledge what they did wrong and/or to rebuke evil. I want to, but won't if they won't make that first step of reconciliation. To harken back to what I said earlier, neither will God :)
You're so blind with rage that you're unable to see what's being discussed here.
We are saying the same thing. Point me to one statement where I said anything that contradicts what you just posted about forgiving people.
Matthew 5:38-48
38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.
41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
Also, I'm as close to being a fundamentalist as you can get without being one, if not I simply am one. And when I see pussies pacifying the Word, I give them their due share of fire and brimstone. If someone wants to only present one side of the scripture, I'm going to let them know about it.
Also, also, everything I've said has come from minimal teaching of men. Majority of it is my own interpretation of scripture as all I've done is read the Bible.
So much stuff seems to be ramping up recently, with this being among them. Was it like this in 2020 around this time? I only started following Q after The_Donald went to absolute doomer dogshit on 1/6 and 1/20.
You've certainly cried online a bunch. Primarily about people you don't know who you distrust and invalidate the victim status of for the actions of people you do know.
Edit: And I guess God is a cuck according to you. Because what I said on that topic that you conveniently ignored is, the way I see it, completely and fully true.
In fact, all I did was describe what the Bible says and you called me a cuck. Who are you really calling a cuck here?
People either refused to take the poison, or make excuses to justify their decision to take the poison, or they did neither because your false dichotomy doesn't reflect reality.
Your hatred can haunt society until the Second Coming of Christ. Still not of God.
Blaming victims who didn't try to victimize anyone and conflating them with unhinged, 'evil' vax mandaters is not God's will, whether they're in denial over what happened or not.
Forgiveness is God's desire. He wants to provide it so much, He died for it. For us. And if you want to go all the way, that includes people who wanted us to be executed for not getting the vax. If they realize the error of their way, repent, and desire forgiveness, doing God's will would be forgiving them. He will.
I do believe these people should be given a fair dose of criticism for their error, to help them learn and prevent it from happening again. But conflating the victims with the victimizers is not that. And it should come from a desire to help, not from hatred of them.
I'm certainly not happy at these people, but I try and focus my efforts on people who deserve it. Like pedophiles and tyrants. Not random morons who got duped by pedophiles and tyrants, but who otherwise just sit around doing nothing but pontificating online.
God's Will is almost certainly not you painting every single person you can find who got tricked as evil just because some actual evil people made you justly mad.
What's logically fucking stupid is thinking that how a victim reacts and what they say or do has any impact on whether or not they were victim to a crime.
Also, what's even more logically fucking retarded is you conflating jab victims with crazed leftists who demand forced vaccination or removal from society for unvaxxed.
The difference between someone "getting the jab" and "advocating for punishing the unvaxxed" doesn't fit your narrative, so you ignore it outright.
To do what? Peacefully protest in the cold?