https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1714445456737198219
Iranian embassy in Syria tweets in Hebrew:
“time is up"
"This is a follow-up to Clowns in America, School of Assassins and Dictators, and The Shadow Game, an introduction into the seedy origins and consequences of the CIA.
The Shadow Government was established and entrenched over many decades. It had become so powerful that many people inside and outside of the country feared the consequences of trying to buck the system. But there were moments in time when this corrupt CIA controlled shadow government actually seemed vulnerable.
One such moment happened on October 5, 1986.
What happened?"
...
"It was the Iran-Contra scandal. But what was this scandal really about? Was it just about illegal arms sales? That’s always been the narrative. I believe that’s the purposeful ‘red herring’ argument deployed by the shadow government in order to hide the truth. The real truth reveals that the shadow government had been operating outside of Congressional oversight and without authorization of the president for a long time.
The shadow government had been setting up their own, independent funding sources, outside of any Congressional control. This is what the Iran-Contra scandal should have been focused on. Instead, the whole country focused on selling weapons for hostages and fighting communism.
The Iran-Contra scandal did expose some key players in the shadow government, however.
There are interesting connections to this scandal that help to reveal the truth and surprisingly, they involve phone calls—evidence from phone calls that connect key individuals to something much bigger than just arming some rebels in Nicaragua or freeing hostages."
The "Wailing Wall" is simply the remaining western retaining wall for the platform that held the Temple above, which, as you note was completely destroyed with "no stone left upon another" by the Romans. The Wailing Wall is not part of the Temple, but the closest the Jews can get to the site of the previously existing Temple and Holy of Holies (actually the tunnel portion to the north of the plaza is the recognized closest).
"Some reading this have probably heard me talk about the Eurodollar. The Eurodollar, not the Euro.
The Euro is a currency currently being used by 20 European countries as their currency. Eurodollars are US dollars held overseas, in foreign banks and offshore accounts. Because Eurodollars are held overseas, they aren’t subject to US taxation or US Federal Reserve regulations.
I’ve asked this question before, but if you were a criminal or criminal organization, would you rather hide your money in US dollars in the US banking system, or in Eurodollars in a Cayman Islands account?
Until recently, criminal organizations have had the best of both worlds, in that they’ve had the strength of the US dollar, but held overseas in non-taxable, non-transparent accounts.
The European Union started in 1993 and currently consists of 27 member states. It used to be 28 until England chose to leave in 2020 through the Brexit vote in 2016.
When I see the year 1993, I can’t help but think this is around the time George Soros broke the Bank of England by shorting the English Pound, and Rhodes Scholar Bill Clinton and his family moved into the White House, while China began its economic boom, led by moving American manufacturing to China to create inexpensive items which would be sold at Walmart.
Interestingly enough, while England was a big proponent of the EU, it chose not to use the Euro currency when it went into use in 1999. 20 European countries currently use the Euro, but England chose to pass from the beginning.
As punishment for the British citizens’ vote to Brexit, they have been overwhelmed with mass immigration and ‘woke’ policies ever since. As I’ve said countless times before, it’s not the British ‘people’ who control the world through globalism, but the elites who call England home, specifically the one square mile City of London."
"This is a follow-up to Clowns in America and School of Assassins and Dictators, an introduction into the seedy origins of the CIA.
…
Shall we play a game?
This Q post [4794] is talking about the CIA. The link is about the CIA doing everything they can to prevent the “public exposure” of their treason, through declassification of the evidence.
Self preservation. Self preservation is the most important thing to the CIA. They will do whatever it takes to “prevent public exposure of the truth.”
“Buck the system?” The CIA will not tolerate any attempt by anybody to “buck the system” that they have set up to control things.
What is the “Shadow Game”?
To the global cabal of elites, everything is just a game. They don’t value human life at all. Wealth and power are all that matters to them.
The CIA is often referred to by Q as the “shadow agency.” They have been engaged in a “shadow game” of war, to create a “shadow government,” that controls the entire country in order to control the world. All of it is outside of constitutional restrictions. George H.W. Bush was at the center of it all.
But this shadow government that Bush was creating when he became head of the CIA back in 1976 was about to face someone who would try to “buck the system.”
Who was it? The answer may surprise you. This person is the very reason that Iran-Contra would become a scandal and expose the “shadow government.”
The person who tried to “buck the system” was President Jimmy Carter.
Carter had done several things, that went directly against the shadow government Bush was creating.
I don’t think anybody remembers them.
What was the first big thing Carter did? According to The Intercept:
Bush only lasted a year as CIA director. Ford — who ended up choosing Bob Dole as his running mate — was defeated by Jimmy Carter in the 1976 election. Bush tried to convince Carter to keep him on as CIA director, but Carter’s vice president was Walter Mondale, who had been a leading member of the Church Committee and had already won a commitment from Carter to try to implement many of the committee’s recommendations for reforming the intelligence community.
Carter refused to keep Bush on as head of the CIA. That was a big blow to Bush and I really don’t think he expected it.
What else did Carter do? He ended the use of the CIA training manuals at the School of Americas (SOA) that taught assassination and torture of civilians, because it went against human civil rights. I talked about that in my last article.
What was the third thing Carter did that went against the shadow government? It was something that directly led to the Iran-Contra scandal.
He cut off funding for the Somoza regime in Nicaragua because of its human rights violations. This was a huge deal. This weakened and helped to topple the Somoza dictatorship controlled by the CIA; That’s how the Sandanista’s were able to take control of Nicaragua. This would lead to the Iran-Contra operation designed to fund and arm a rebel army to take back power.
Carter was trying to “buck the system,” and used the power of the presidency to do it.
Bush couldn’t let Carter win a second term. That would derail, or at least hamper the shadow government and global drug trafficking operations he had worked hard to establish over the last several decades. Bush decided to run for president himself. He clearly wasn’t popular, and lost the nomination to Ronald Reagan who was tricked into choosing Bush as his running mate. I talked about that in my last article too.
As Reagan’s Vice Presidential candidate, Bush would be in a position to entrench the shadow government permanently.
How could Bush ensure that Carter would lose the election? The Iranian Revolution became the perfect opportunity. When the Shah of Iran was overthrown and Americans were taken hostage, it made President Carter look weak on the national stage.
Bush would use this to his advantage."
...
"The FBI investigation of the US embassy bombing earlier that year painted a picture of the danger the Marines were in. They were literally left as “sitting ducks” because this important information that would have warned them, was kept from the military commanders by the CIA and state department.
Why? The answer is a terrible thought. Do you want to know the truth? The honest truth? Our troops have been pawns and sacrificed around the world in instances just like this, along with wars, for the enrichment of a global cabal of elites that don’t value our lives at all and never have. That’s the truth.
There were more warnings that were never given to the military commanders.
More from Foreign Policy:
The most fateful signal came in late September. The National Security Agency, which intercepted radio and satellite communications around the globe, snatched a message from the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security to the Iranian ambassador in Syria. The ministry ordered the ambassador to get in touch with a man named Hussein Musawi, the head of an Islamic terrorist group called Amal. Musawi was to turn his sights on the multinational forces in Lebanon and was ordered to mount a "spectacular action against the United States Marines."
The Beirut airport was the only place to launch such a spectacular attack. The NSA intercept was the clearest indication yet that the Marines sat in the crosshairs. But owing to the cumbersome military chain of command and an inexplicable failure to grasp the "spectacular" urgency, the message wasn’t delivered to senior military officials until two days after the bombing.
They had definitive proof that Iran was behind the attack on the Marine barracks that killed 241 Americans.
Doesn’t that raise a huge question that nobody seems to be asking? If we knew Iran was behind the killing of 241 Marines, why would we be negotiating to sell arms to them just one year later? You know the answer. It was far more important to protect the drug trade through Nicaragua than it was to protect our Marines. It was also far more important for the CIA to be allowed to control the information flowing to the entire executive branch.
They were sacrificed. Why? More from Foreign Policy:
In reaction to the Beirut attack, and a subsequent bombing of the new U.S. embassy nearly a year later, Poindexter led a massive reorganization of the government’s crisis management teams. He formed an alliance with his friend Bill Casey, the CIA Director. The two had developed an honest rapport, and Casey was one of the few senior officials Poindexter felt he could speak to frankly.
The CIA set up a secure hotline connecting the State Department, the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the NSC staff with the CIA’s photographic intelligence center. This was the government’s primary resource for imagery analysis, and yet there had never been any data links into or out of it. That was about to change.
An alliance with Bill Casey, the head of the CIA? What a coincidence!
A secure hotline was set up by the CIA to funnel all information from every government agency involved with intelligence and security through the CIA filter.
The CIA and Bush now had control of both information to the president through the PDB and information to the entire executive branch when it came to intelligence and national security.
Mission accomplished! More from Foreign Policy:
To lead them, Poindexter took over an existing NSC outfit called the Crisis-Pre Planning Group. He turned it into the engine of the government’s antiterrorism campaign, one that was powered–for the first time–by modern information technologies designed to capture information and get it to the people who needed it.
Looking back now, it’s clear that Poindexter was planting the seeds of a much broader, pervasive, and ultimately global system of information gathering. The government was getting a handle on what was in its own databases. It would be another two decades, after the 9/11 attacks, that the intelligence agencies turned their gaze toward the worlds of data held in private stores. On private individuals. Then, too, Poindexter would help lead those efforts, as the director of a Defense Department program called Total Information Awareness. It bore a striking resemblance to the global surveillance of the National Security Agency today, and that was no accident.
The CIA shadow government surveillance state was now entrenched, thanks to a suicide bombing that sacrificed 241 unarmed Marines.
Now let’s go back to the important question: If we knew Iran was behind the killing of 241 Marines, why would we be negotiating to sell arms to them just one year later? Clearly, the CIA and shadow government didn’t view Iran as the enemy. That was just the public narrative that would be pushed for a coming never-ending war on terrorism. They weren’t an enemy to Bush; they were actually a partner.
But Bush still needed an excuse to sell arms to Iran, one that would garner sympathy from both the American people and President Reagan.
What would be the reasoning?
It would become a CIA template that would be used many more times in the future in order to fund our enemies.
Hostages. In my next article, I will dive deep into the Iran-Contra scandal, which was a massive money-laundering operation, and I will also reveal the untold part of the hostages story in Lebanon."
"What is the best way to present evidence of election theft in the current environment? Answer: by indicting Trump for, essentially, lying about the 2020 election.
The recent indictments against Trump et al by Jack Smith and Fani Willis fundamentally rest upon the allegation that Trump has been lying about the 2020 election; if you read the indictments closely, you’ll see that this is the “crime” that gives rise to all the other alleged crimes for which Trump et al stand accused. One could argue that, through these indictments, the very act of disagreeing with the mainstream is being criminalized.
Nonetheless, in both cases, the prosecution has a serious problem: what if Trump has been telling the truth this whole time?
As a defendant, Trump has discovery powers and (at least in theory) can use these powers to place evidence of election fraud onto the court record; this could be huge, given the fact that 50 previous cases related to election fraud have been dismissed on standing, rather than because of any problem with the evidence brought forward in said cases. We haven’t had a proper hearing yet regarding election fraud, but now that Trump has been made the defendant in these cases, he MUST be given the opportunity to prove that he’s been telling the truth—this is a requirement of due process.
Will the NY and GA courts do the right thing? That remains to be seen. Perhaps these cases will reach a just conclusion—or, if they are mishandled, perhaps the Supreme Court may weigh in. Indeed, if evidence of election fraud makes it before the Supreme Court, then that could open a massive can of worms for the Biden administration…
To be quite frank, this looks like a set-up to me."
....
Either Jack Smith and Fani Willis are desperate to get Trump on anything they can, and have served up the best they’ve got, or perhaps it’s the case that these indictments were crafted to give Trump precisely the ammo he needs to proceed with the next phase of the 5G war. Either way, they have been filed, and there’s no going back now.
If it’s part of “the plan,” then what further evidence of coordination might we find?
....
Possible Fulfillment of a Comm? White Squall Revisited What if I told you that the events of today were predicted years ago by an anonymous insider on 4chan?
It is my opinion that White Squall—a movie about a ragtag group of boys who are taken out to sea by a captain named Skipper, where they brave numerous storms ending with a giant tidal wave—is meant to be understood as a narrative-metaphor for the journey that Trump, Q, and Anons have been on since Q first appeared on the scene in October 2017.
....
In a nutshell, Skipper gets placed on trial for doing the best he can with his ship and crew while facing enormous, destructive natural forces. Does that sound familiar?
Most importantly, at the very end of White Squall, the Skipper is redeemed by his surviving crew, who stand by him during his trial. In a similar manner, loyal Anons are stepping into their role as the New News (“you are the news now” – Q), and are thereby helping to shape the social/informational landscape in a way that assists Trump to get his fair hearing. (When it comes to highly politicized proceedings, what happens in a courtroom is often downstream from what happens in the court of public opinion).
Could all of this be happening right now by accident? Or are we witnessing the fulfillment of a very long and detailed plan?
It’s deeply ironic that Trump et al are accused of engaging in a massive conspiracy.
Perhaps they are …
WWG1WGA!
... “Rep. John Smithee, a long-time House member, spoke on the House Floor during the impeachment vote in May. He was one of only 23 who voted against impeachment. Rep. Smithee said that the House could not legitimately impeach AG Paxton on the record because there was no record to send to the Senate. He said the House was not following the rule of law, and he said the House approach was, and I quote:
“Hang ’em now and judge them later.”
Rep. Andrew Murr, the Chair of the House Investigating Committee, said on the House floor:
“This [The House] is not the body that does the fact finding, the fact-finding occurs in the Senate and oath for any witness would occur there.”
“That is just not true. As Rep. Smithee said, the last House impeachment of a statewide-elected official, in 1917 of Gov. Ferguson, was conducted like a full trial in the House before it was sent to the Senate. Witnesses were put under oath and cross examined by the defendant. Rep. Smithee said this time, no House witnesses were put under oath and the defendant was denied the right to cross examine. Rep. Smithee told his fellow members the House process was indefensible and that the House did not follow the rules of evidence and their case was based on triple hearsay that would never be allowed in court.
“I think Rep. Smithee’s speech was one of the most honest and courageous speeches I have ever heard in the House.
https://www.breitbart.com/border/2023/09/16/senate-vote/
Texas Attorney General Kenneth Paxton Acquitted in Senate Impeachment Trial, Reinstated as AG
.... "In my opinion Reagan was completely ignorant of the hidden enemy controlling the world. He truly thought the real enemy of the world was communism. That’s what he committed to fight against during his presidency. The enemy from within knew that communism was Reagan’s main focus, so they used that commitment against him.
The Cold War The “shadow government” used “battling communism” as their excuse to start proxy wars in order to grow and maintain their global drug trafficking and money laundering operations. Most of it was covert operations that they were hiding from the public and Congressional oversight. I don’t believe Reagan was in the loop on a lot of what was going on.
The shadow government would go into overdrive during Reagan’s administration.
Vice President George H.W. Bush was behind it all." ....
"William Casey was a member of the Office of Strategic Services, which was the precursor to the CIA. He was head of intelligence in Europe. He became Reagan’s campaign manager and then would convince Reagan to choose Bush as his VP before becoming Reagan’s choice to head the CIA. Bush and Casey were now in powerful positions in order to give the CIA control over the Reagan administration and cement the shadow government control over the executive branch.
Reagan was surrounded by a den of vipers, and I don’t think he realized it.
How do we know there was a growing shadow government during the Reagan administration? It was already being built by Bush before he became Reagan’s VP.
In my last article I mentioned the Phoenix Program in Vietnam, but I didn’t go into detail. It was a CIA assassination and torture program of civilians, which went against the Geneva convention. The Phoenix Program would be expanded by the CIA to other parts of the world and leave many countries trapped in perpetual poverty and chaos. Many of these countries are strategically important for the CIA’s global drug trafficking operations." ....
"Bush and the CIA had been training dictators and their military in Latin America using the same program they had used in Vietnam long before Reagan became president.
Was it just about fighting global communism? That was the “Big Lie.” Bush used fighting communism as the excuse during the Cold War in order to set up proxy governments in very important locations. What country is the biggest cocaine producer in the world? Colombia. One of the places that Bush set up operations for his Zapata Offshore drilling company was in Medellin, Colombia. I talked about that in my last article.
Here’s what’s interesting.
Many of these countries where CIA dictators took control all play a strategic role in the cocaine trade flowing directly into the United States.
Take a look at this map of Central America.
Look at the countries connecting Colombia to the United States.
- Panama
- Costa Rica
- Nicaragua
- Honduras
- El Salvador
- Guatemala
- Mexico All of them either had rulers, members of their military or police forces trained at the SOA.
All of them were being controlled by the CIA, yet the CIA did nothing to stop the flow of drugs into the U.S.
In fact, the CIA was promoting it." ....
"It’s a sad history throughout Central America that has been plagued by the CIA and a shadow government set up by Bush.
Did you notice that many of these corrupt governments in Central America have connections to the Iran-Contra scandal in some way? Coincidence? In my next article, I will dive deep into the Iran-Contra scandal that will reveal Bush’s shadow government and lead us to massive money laundering and connections to Hezbollah. I will also go into the Bush ties to drug traffickers in Colombia and Mexico."
I was perturbed that HH was trying to get a negative sound bite of Trump "promising revenge". He interviewed Pence today and I didn't hear any challenging questions while pence is warning of the "siren song of populism" blech!
Bookmark thanks