6
SuddenRealization 6 points ago +6 / -0

Funny but this does really make me wonder how many people are infected. In 2007 NYT thought it was 50 million or more in the US alone.

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will say you are missing out on worship - it is one of the best experiences on the planet if you are truly opening yourself to God.

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

Over which front page? Chrome definitely seems to listen when open

3
SuddenRealization 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, someone else is not needed. God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are witness to it. however the Bible does say confess with your mouth. Meaning do not deny him before men.

Romans 10:9

"If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved."

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were a lot of people on P.WIN talking about something popping off / bringing weapons to DC pre Jan 6. That was one of the big reasons I decided not to go.

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

Want to talk to me?

What part of my statement is "full of BS" ?

Nowhere did I say that PV shouldn't have released the footage, read it again.

Clearly PV's legal council sucks.

7
SuddenRealization 7 points ago +7 / -0

Watched the whole thing. What makes you think that?

James had a clear responsibility to PV to not release illegally recorded footage. Should they have done so and risked prison for all of them? Maybe, but that's very different than someone being CIA.

If James was CIA this guy's identity would have been leaked a long time ago as a means to chill whistleblowers.

Aside from that, I agree this is worth watching. The guy's footage is very compelling (aside from the "viruses aren't real" conspiracy) and I do think James needs to answer for Bohemian Grove. I will also say this guy comes across as increasingly paranoid as his story progresses. He broadly accuses everyone in right wing media as being part of mockingbird.

Edit: Then James releases a video exposing the CIA. You really still think that?

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think Wray is dirty actually, closing this post.

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

JK I believe I'm completely wrong on this one but correct about Barr.

Im going to repost with updated info.

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can likely only if it's documented that they had the conversation with the AG about it.

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

I should hope so.

People have been far too liberal with IVF for a long time though.

3
SuddenRealization 3 points ago +3 / -0

Couples should be careful and request only 1 fertilized at one time.

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sorry - people who hire illegals as administrators should get an accessory to a crime charge along with instant termination.

And if someone is invading, aren't they inherently an enemy to the state?

What's aiding and abetting enemies to the state called again?

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

I generally don't watch them to be fair but the people I know who do often complain about the degeneracy and still watch them anyway.

But it's good to hear that some people respond positively.

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hard disagree (I did not downvote you). Social media in general had eroded culture and kept people to more extreme social bubbles rather than talking with each other reasonably in person.

Tiktok and other short video content has lowered people's attention span, critical thinking skills (they just on to the next video), and lowered the propensity to create in favor of consuming endless content. When I watch endless scrolling content without choice I literally feel dumber watching it.

People are largely exposed to and recommended degenerate and leftist talking points as well.

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's certainly possible. We'll see what happens in the senate.

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you would like to ban all groups and applications that engage in any kind of moderation or content control that has serious far reaching implications.

I don't care about Tiktok. I care about other platforms like Win, Yandex, Rumble, Truth Social, private forums, 8chan, etc

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Thank you for the correction.

Even I fell into the trap of using the popular name of the bill here which is not a correct categorization of what it does. I am fully against this bill at this point.

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you believe in free speech?

Free speech is very different than poison or abortion.

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

As much as I despise Tiktok I think banning platforms is not very American.

Youtube shorts is effectively the same app and that gets not nearly as much hate.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›