Please know that what I'm going to say isn't intended as an attack on you.

I just don't understand why people who know how untrustworthy the medical community is continue to go to them.

I understand that the medical industry has tried to bury alternative healthcare and make it more difficult to know who to go to for things like migraines.

But when you see that they are intentionally harming people with vaccines and "treatments" for illnesses, why continue to go to them?

I hope your daughter can find someone who helps her with her migraines. I used to have them as well, and they can be truly horrific.

I was able to stop most of my headaches through diet. I kept a food diary and noted whenever I had a migraine. I discovered that whenever I ate something with lots of sulfites, I would have a migraine. So I cut out red wine and processed foods like hot dogs and went from 1 or 2 migraines a week to maybe 3 or 4 migraines a year.

Best wishes to your daughter on getting well.

If the only issue was driving out the bad, no. But some voters are concerned with other things as well. And it's those things that are driving a wedge between people.

It's why we have so many people called RINOs. Anytime someone has a different stance on a touchy topic, they get called a RINO.

So...what exactly are you saying? The media is somehow forcing President Trump to continue to sing the praises of the vaccine?

If not, then what the hell does the media have to do with what President Trump is choosing to say at his own rallies and on his own social media accounts?

You seem to be attempting to blame the media for what Trump is choosing to do at his own rallies now.

Do you think he is still being forced to stick with their narrative even now?

Not only that, he still talks about how wonderful he thinks the vaccine is.

The vaccines did roll out under Biden. By the time the vax was ready for the public, Trump was out of office.

Agree 100%.

Sadly, the biggest victims were the elderly who were raised to think that a man says what he means and means what he says and didn't spend time online, looking for clues to understand what Trump really meant when he claimed to get the shot and was constantly singing its praises.

But totally their own fault, right?

What? I hope you're not saying that the media is making it up that Trump is still singing the praises of the clot shot. He's saying it at rallies and in interviews. There are videos of him saying it. Are you seriously going to try to pretend the media is making it up?

Ugh, I can't stand the hypocrisy of people when it comes to carbon footprints. I think the worst case I've heard about was Leonardo DiCaprio taking his personal jet to some awards ceremony for him to pick up an award for working on environmental causes. 🙄

I understand needing a personal plane if security is a legitimate concern, like with Presidents, but c'mon. I'd say 99% of private jets are just for people flexing their nuts or they just don't want to mingle with the riff raff.

And maybe don't keep building 20,000 sq ft houses in places where they regularly get burned down in forest fires or destroyed by hurricanes. Maybe don't have 7 of those 20,000 sq ft houses.

I think they turn many people off on the entire issue. And not just conservatives. One of my inlaws is super liberal and she rants about all the smug environmental avengers more than anyone else I know. She can't stand their BS.

So no more talks of him going 3rd party and making MAGA a separate party?

It wasn't that long ago that people were piling up on that bandwagon.

But yeah, since he did well with the Iowa Caucus, I guess going 3rd party isn't that appealing now.

Seriously? So just meat and dairy?

What does hanging and firing squads have to do with DWAC stocks?

You're right. I completely forgot he took X private. But you could invest in Tesla, or any other non-cabal stock.

So, again, why DWAC over any other non-cabal stock? What is the allure? All they have is TS, which as you said yourself, is virtually the same as X. The only reason why TS was created was due to censorship on Twitter, which no longer is an issue. What is the appeal of TS?

So now we're waiting on yet another EO to be made so assets from the cabal can be seized and auctioned off to the public?

Ok, let's pretend that such an EO is signed, the cabal is finally crushed, and all their assets are auctioned off to the public.

How does that help DWAC? I asked this earlier, and your response was basically 'non-cabal stocks will do well when the cabal is gone'.

So why DWAC instead of another non-cabal stock? Especially considering that the only asset of DWAC is virtually the same thing as X, which no longer censors conservatives, which is why TS was created in the first place? Why not just invest in X?

You're simply assuming that the only action that comes from blocking assets is to finally seize them and distribute them to the public for auction.

That's quite an assumption.

They block their assets so those involved in those crimes can no longer continue performing those crimes with those assets. Stopping the crime is the objective, not seizing property so DWAC will benefit. Or seizing property to distribute or auction.

If seizing and redistributing those assets was part of the EO, why do you think they failed to put that very important detail in the EO?

Yes, I read the EO, and as you said yourself, it says blocked. Not seized. Where are you seeing in that EO that it says assets will be seized or transferred and then distributed for auction to the public?

Sure, I wish you well in your investments. I'm simply trying to understand why people go gaga over this stock, which by all accounts seems to be a dud. Go back and read this conversation from the beginning and look at how your reasoning changed.

It started with your belief that there was an EO (there's not) that would seize property, including patents, from the major social media sites because of voter interference, and those assets provided or auctioned off to Trump's business venture and the stock would take off because of that and finally ended up as non-cabal stocks will do well when Trump gets rid of the cabal. And you've even admitted yourself that TS, the sole asset of DWAC, is virtually the same as X. So why do we need it?

I'm sorry if these questions upset you. But they're valid questions.

I get that they're a SPAC. But none of what you're saying makes any sense.

You're basing your reason on EOs that don't claim what you're saying they claim. Those EOs aren't saying that althethese companies you're thinking of will have all their assets seized by the US and given or auctioned off to the public. They're saying that certain assets in the US will be blocked.

Blocked and seized are two entirely separate things.

It seems like you're just buying this stock is because you like Trump. As far as I can tell, DWAC has nothing other than Truth Social, which you have said yourself is basically the same as Twitter (X). And since X no longer censors conservatives and has millions and millions of more users, what is the point of Truth Social now? And since DWAC doesn't have anything other than TS, what is the point of it now?

I like President Trump, too. I voted for him before. I'll vote for him again. But that doesn't mean I have to pretend this stock is great. I think this is a case of The Emperor Has No Clothes.

Stuff like this is why people say Trump supporters are cult-like. Pointing out that your reasoning for purchasing stock is flawed isn't a personal criticism of President Trump. Sometimes ideas just don't work out. And that's ok. And unfortunately, some of Trump's ventures have been turkeys. Trump Water, Trump Steaks, Trump Airlines, Trump Casinos, etc... How much stock do you have in those Trump-owned companies, since you're basing your stock purchased partly on him "shitting gold" or whatever it is you said.

So you're investing in stock because you like their name?

Other than TruthSocial, what other ventures is DWAC involved in?

And I still don't understand how getting rid of the cabal will directly help DWAC.

You might want to go double check that EO about human trafficking. From what I've been reading about it, their property isn't open to being seized, but blocked. That's a pretty important detail to get right, I think.

Also, if Twitter (X) and TruthSocial are basically the same app, why bother continuing on with TruthSocial when X already has a huge audience?

Wasn't the entire point of TruthSocial was to give people a place where there wasn't so much censorship of conservatives?

Since Musk has taken over Twitter, I think that goal has been achieved.

So, what is the point of TruthSocial now?

So you think the issue with TruthS social and DWAC not doing well is because the general public isn't aware enough about it and have yet to get clued in about Q and the Plan?