1
TopSecretSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

It may be that the Dems ran the same cherry-picked stacks of ballots through tabulators, repeatedly, without removing Trump votes.

The Dems may have favored the stacks which favored Biden, so both Biden’s & Trump’s totals multiplied in unison, but Biden’s total multiplied quicker than Trump’s due to the fact Trump had fewer votes in their cherry-picked duplicate stacks.

After duplicating both Biden and Trump ballots, Dems then used their Trump duplicates to dismiss all their cheats by arguing, “Well, Trump had duplicates, too, so we can’t say who the cheaters really are! Durrrr…!”

1
TopSecretSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

The recording sounds fake as hell. That said, if it’s not fake — perhaps, “boxes” are DVD cases or safes or servers?

1
TopSecretSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plus, there was another allegation, that Sean Combs had drugged Aaliyah, placed her on a sabotaged plane.

Supposedly, Aaliyah was expected to be elsewhere, not on a plane, not traveling, but — a picture of her passed-out on the plane exists, and that picture suggests she didn’t walk onto the plane, but she was PLACED on the plane.

Allegedly, while Aaliyah was underage, she was taken advantage of in every way, drugged and raped, passed around, had a secret marriage with R. Kelly, then murdered/sacrificed via the intended plane crash.

Anyways, don’t quote me on any of this stuff, because, as we all know, random allegations can be complete bullshit.

2
TopSecretSauce 2 points ago +2 / -0

One should hope so, satanic witches or no satanic witches, the Asheville area is far too beautiful for an ugly-ass lithium mine.

1
TopSecretSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know whether that theory is true or false in her case: it may be true, but it may not be true.

2
TopSecretSauce 2 points ago +2 / -0

I couldn’t commit to a yes or a no on that — I don’t know, but I doubt it. It’s possible, but I doubt it.

2
TopSecretSauce 2 points ago +2 / -0

The woman from Canton, Ohio (from the Police body worn camera) — she wasn’t a Haitian immigrant, but she lived in Canton, Ohio since birth, so said her neighbors.

What’s more, according to her neighbors, she was having mental problems and/or was on drugs, because that wasn’t normal for her.

by Koanic
3
TopSecretSauce 3 points ago +3 / -0

How long have they lived in the house? Maybe, it’s nothing more than a set.

9
TopSecretSauce 9 points ago +10 / -1

UNCONSTITUTIONAL..

In relation to viruses, the dainty panty-like masks were and are absolute bullshit, but this law is extra-bullshit.

I understand why FEARFUL/PARANOID people would want masks outlawed, except, I also understand how politicians/police who are CORRUPT ASF will thrive by empowering their tyrannical surveillance state this way.

As Long Island Audit (YouTuber) has shown, Nassau County is probably the most corrupt county in the nation, so I cannot believe Nassau County is banning masks with the best of intentions.

3
TopSecretSauce 3 points ago +3 / -0

During Trump’s 2020 run, during a Trump rally, while Trump was on stage — a young man tried to steal/wrestle a gun away from a cop, a gun he would have used to shoot Trump.

During one of Trump’s 2016 rallies, some dude tried to rush the stage, but his motives have been unknown to me. (The Secret Service stopped that guy, that time.)

1
TopSecretSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Essentially, in addition to saying “NO SPLIT ALLEGIANCES”, Bingham also stated, “NATURALIZED = ADOPTED”; Bingham never asserted “NATURALIZED = NATURAL-BORN.”

The term NATURAL-BORN could not be made more simple than it already was, and Congress fully understood the differences between the words Bingham utilized as he utilized them.

Furthermore, the evils of TYRANNY wasn’t an alien concept for the founders; they didn’t need to define ARMS any more than the authors of the 14th needed to define differences between the terms NATURAL-BORN and ADOPTED.

I mean, I would dare believe, “We the People” should be allowed to own any weapon a government is allowed to wield, due to the fact the government consists of (or SHOULD consist of) “We the People”, and I would dare believe the founders would agree with that, wholeheartedly.

In other words, ARMS are ARMS — whether the arms exist as/on guns, cannons, navy vessels, tanks, flamethrowers, rockets, jets, subs, spacecrafts, space lasers, para-gliders, chemical weapons, planet destroyers, etc. — any freedom-loving American should have the capacity to fortify their existence via any form of mutually assured destruction.

Furthermore, as crazy as the “mutually assured destruction” assertion may be, even with NUKES in the mix, I 100% believe America’s founders would feel the same way, because they knew crazy tyrants could only be matched with crazy offenses/defenses, so they knew how placing defined limits on what ARMS may or may not be could only serve as an act of infringement, an alienation of rights, a crime against any free law-abiding American.

5
TopSecretSauce 5 points ago +5 / -0

WRONG…

There was no need for the US Constitution to define Natural-Born Citizen, because the authors of the 14th Amendment understood the term’s meaning was already well understood.

Like the term “ARMS” was well understood and self-evident for the authors of the 2nd Amendment, “NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN” was well understood and self-evident for the authors of the 14th Amendment.

That said, John Bingham — the lead author of the 14th Amendment — he still told everyone precisely how “NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN” is to be understood while he discussed the term on the congressional floor. In other words, the “definition” came directly from the author of the 14th Amendment:

https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=059/llcg059.db&recNum=680

HIGHLIGHTS:

John Bingham | A Matter of Allegiance

"To naturalize a person is to admit him to citizenship. Who are natural-born citizens but those born within the Republic? Those born within the Republic, whether black or white, are citizens by birth -- natural-born citizens. There is no such thing as white in your Constitution. Citizenship, therefore, does not depend upon complexion any more than it depends upon the rights of election or of office. All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians." [Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 37th Congress, 2nd Session]

“Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” [Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 39th Congress, 1st Session]

“…OF PARENTS NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY…”

9
TopSecretSauce 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, DeSantis was a perfect example for that point — except — I’d say: Vance’s RINO history is WORSE than DeSantis’ RINO history; Vance’s history is deeper and much more retarded than DeSantis’, whereas DeSantis exposed himself as quite a cartoonish retard.

Who claims to be “Conservative Republican* but opts to vote for Hillary Clinton — of ALL crooked anti-American candidates? It’s totally illogical and unbelievable.

Off the top of my head, a similar “Conservative Republican” [snake] who made such an illogical transition was Destiny (the lefty YouTuber, gamer, debater), an absolute freak who claimed he was a die hard Ron Paul supporter turned Hillary Clinton supporter.

2
TopSecretSauce 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t believe the RINOs.

The RINOs must feel they’ve been successful, that they’ve successfully defeated Trump, so, now, they’re rushing to fill the massive void they expect Trump will leave behind.

At the same time, I suspect, the RINOs hope Trump gets assigned to Epstein’s old prison cell, the “…most secure cell on Earth.”

5
TopSecretSauce 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump/Woods 2024

Seriously, has there ever been single statement Woods has made that anyone could counter or disprove?

Woods has a mind that is grounded, fully based in logic, in truth and in reality, so — TRUMP — if you read this thread — you really should look into whether Woods could be your running mate.

Skip the circus of possible RINOs, Woods may be the one.

1
TopSecretSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I totally understand that point, although I don’t see any reason $TMTG couldn’t be equally iconic, possibly more iconic and more relevant, more future-proof, an awesome empire which may be passed down to future Trumps (Barron Trump, for example.)

TMTG+ will still be a thing, right? Only the symbol is changing? I feel dumb for even asking that question, as I believe TMTG+ will exist, as it should exist, but — now — the symbol change makes everything feel like a gimmick, so, idk.

People will buy $DJT just to make a statement, but they’ll sell $DJT whenever anything negative happens to Donald Trump. $TMTG seemed more promising, like a stable foundation built to withstand greater things to come.

3
TopSecretSauce 3 points ago +3 / -0

I get what the op is saying, but…

$TMTG seemed more professional, more relevant to what the company was meant to become, a new awesome empire.

$DJT comes off as gimmicky, like it’s just there to pick a fight. Although a fight is needed, the media/tech group should have been an emphasized focus, as it was before the symbol change.

Or, do I have it wrong? Is $TMTG going to be a thing, too?

2
TopSecretSauce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Coincidentally, a minute before seeing this article, I watched an old video of the Japan Tsunami, in which people driving cars toward the wave were slamming on their brakes, doing u-turns and speeding away from the wave.

Imagine how doomed drivers would be with built-in speed limiters, during a crisis. Imagine how boring Hollywood’s action movies would become.

Anyone supporting such limits would shoot everyone in the foot.

view more: Next ›