UNCONSTITUTIONAL..
In relation to viruses, the dainty panty-like masks were and are absolute bullshit, but this law is extra-bullshit.
I understand why FEARFUL/PARANOID people would want masks outlawed, except, I also understand how politicians/police who are CORRUPT ASF will thrive by empowering their tyrannical surveillance state this way.
As Long Island Audit (YouTuber) has shown, Nassau County is probably the most corrupt county in the nation, so I cannot believe Nassau County is banning masks with the best of intentions.
During Trump’s 2020 run, during a Trump rally, while Trump was on stage — a young man tried to steal/wrestle a gun away from a cop, a gun he would have used to shoot Trump.
During one of Trump’s 2016 rallies, some dude tried to rush the stage, but his motives have been unknown to me. (The Secret Service stopped that guy, that time.)
Essentially, in addition to saying “NO SPLIT ALLEGIANCES”, Bingham also stated, “NATURALIZED = ADOPTED”; Bingham never asserted “NATURALIZED = NATURAL-BORN.”
The term NATURAL-BORN could not be made more simple than it already was, and Congress fully understood the differences between the words Bingham utilized as he utilized them.
Furthermore, the evils of TYRANNY wasn’t an alien concept for the founders; they didn’t need to define ARMS any more than the authors of the 14th needed to define differences between the terms NATURAL-BORN and ADOPTED.
I mean, I would dare believe, “We the People” should be allowed to own any weapon a government is allowed to wield, due to the fact the government consists of (or SHOULD consist of) “We the People”, and I would dare believe the founders would agree with that, wholeheartedly.
In other words, ARMS are ARMS — whether the arms exist as/on guns, cannons, navy vessels, tanks, flamethrowers, rockets, jets, subs, spacecrafts, space lasers, para-gliders, chemical weapons, planet destroyers, etc. — any freedom-loving American should have the capacity to fortify their existence via any form of mutually assured destruction.
Furthermore, as crazy as the “mutually assured destruction” assertion may be, even with NUKES in the mix, I 100% believe America’s founders would feel the same way, because they knew crazy tyrants could only be matched with crazy offenses/defenses, so they knew how placing defined limits on what ARMS may or may not be could only serve as an act of infringement, an alienation of rights, a crime against any free law-abiding American.
WRONG…
There was no need for the US Constitution to define Natural-Born Citizen, because the authors of the 14th Amendment understood the term’s meaning was already well understood.
Like the term “ARMS” was well understood and self-evident for the authors of the 2nd Amendment, “NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN” was well understood and self-evident for the authors of the 14th Amendment.
That said, John Bingham — the lead author of the 14th Amendment — he still told everyone precisely how “NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN” is to be understood while he discussed the term on the congressional floor. In other words, the “definition” came directly from the author of the 14th Amendment:
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=059/llcg059.db&recNum=680
HIGHLIGHTS:
John Bingham | A Matter of Allegiance
"To naturalize a person is to admit him to citizenship. Who are natural-born citizens but those born within the Republic? Those born within the Republic, whether black or white, are citizens by birth -- natural-born citizens. There is no such thing as white in your Constitution. Citizenship, therefore, does not depend upon complexion any more than it depends upon the rights of election or of office. All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians." [Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 37th Congress, 2nd Session]
“Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” [Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 39th Congress, 1st Session]
“…OF PARENTS NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY…”
Yes, DeSantis was a perfect example for that point — except — I’d say: Vance’s RINO history is WORSE than DeSantis’ RINO history; Vance’s history is deeper and much more retarded than DeSantis’, whereas DeSantis exposed himself as quite a cartoonish retard.
Who claims to be “Conservative Republican* but opts to vote for Hillary Clinton — of ALL crooked anti-American candidates? It’s totally illogical and unbelievable.
Off the top of my head, a similar “Conservative Republican” [snake] who made such an illogical transition was Destiny (the lefty YouTuber, gamer, debater), an absolute freak who claimed he was a die hard Ron Paul supporter turned Hillary Clinton supporter.
I don’t believe the RINOs.
The RINOs must feel they’ve been successful, that they’ve successfully defeated Trump, so, now, they’re rushing to fill the massive void they expect Trump will leave behind.
At the same time, I suspect, the RINOs hope Trump gets assigned to Epstein’s old prison cell, the “…most secure cell on Earth.”
Trump/Woods 2024
Seriously, has there ever been single statement Woods has made that anyone could counter or disprove?
Woods has a mind that is grounded, fully based in logic, in truth and in reality, so — TRUMP — if you read this thread — you really should look into whether Woods could be your running mate.
Skip the circus of possible RINOs, Woods may be the one.
Coincidentally, on the same day, the SEC approved the DWAC merge.
Got it, Ty…
I totally understand that point, although I don’t see any reason $TMTG couldn’t be equally iconic, possibly more iconic and more relevant, more future-proof, an awesome empire which may be passed down to future Trumps (Barron Trump, for example.)
TMTG+ will still be a thing, right? Only the symbol is changing? I feel dumb for even asking that question, as I believe TMTG+ will exist, as it should exist, but — now — the symbol change makes everything feel like a gimmick, so, idk.
People will buy $DJT just to make a statement, but they’ll sell $DJT whenever anything negative happens to Donald Trump. $TMTG seemed more promising, like a stable foundation built to withstand greater things to come.
I get what the op is saying, but…
$TMTG seemed more professional, more relevant to what the company was meant to become, a new awesome empire.
$DJT comes off as gimmicky, like it’s just there to pick a fight. Although a fight is needed, the media/tech group should have been an emphasized focus, as it was before the symbol change.
Or, do I have it wrong? Is $TMTG going to be a thing, too?
Coincidentally, a minute before seeing this article, I watched an old video of the Japan Tsunami, in which people driving cars toward the wave were slamming on their brakes, doing u-turns and speeding away from the wave.
Imagine how doomed drivers would be with built-in speed limiters, during a crisis. Imagine how boring Hollywood’s action movies would become.
Anyone supporting such limits would shoot everyone in the foot.
Another option: James Woods
He is not even qualified, as he fails to meet the most basic constitutional requirement.
How does a post with 15 upvotes reach the front page?
Maybe, the virus & vaccine was pulled from beneath the Antarctic ice sheet — they tried to feed people to THE THING.
Ron Paul won many caucuses, but the RINOs still managed to ignore or hijack his delegate slates.
David Barton (from Wall Builders), James Woods, Rand Paul, Ron Paul
I nominate James Woods.
Woods is consistent, principled, well known, unexpected, has been cancelled for supporting Trump, and he’s much smarter than anyone else.
As a bonus, Woods stole Robert Dinero’s wife, Sharron Stone, back when Dinero was a Vegas kingpin and Stone was a hottie. (I kek.)
They’re a couple of demons: one demon is telling Durbin to drive the clown car in an endless loop, and the other demon is telling Durbin to drive the clown car off the nearest cliff.
“What’s going on?”
Simply put, it’s a bunch of [intentionally] ineffective RINOS pretending they give a shit — nothing new.
Altogether, it’s a horde of anti-American clowns, RINOS & commies, clamoring for the spotlight, honking their noses, being useless and retarded
.
I agree.
I have met some incredibly stupid people in my lifetime, so I wouldn’t be too surprised if the old bags weren’t bird-dogging commies, but they sure acted like bird-dogging commies
The overall incident reminded me of many other similar incidents: old commie-like agitators seem to exist wherever/whenever similar incidents (similar to the op video) take place, almost like the commies were assigned to the event, as though their task is strictly to distract and/or divide, ultimately to protect an ulterior mission presently underway.
I wish that journalist had stayed in the public meeting longer, because the meeting was related to “Common Ground” somehow, whereas, often, when commies push their agendas, their lectures about anything “common” tend to be more related to a cult-ish brand of social engineering, brainwashing, not for the good of America.
Hey, I’m not a violent person, and I’m not claiming to be a biologist or anything of that nature, but if you need to know whether your balls actually exist or not, I’ll happily help you out with that, and that’s all I meant by my offer.
Clearly, you and your friend only specialize in being fags and kicking your own asses, so I’ll be charitable for each of you, I’ll donate a couple ball checks for each of you.
Eventually, if you and your friend discover you have balls and want your balls removed, I could only guess you would need to contact your nearest wood chipper salesman for such a job, because I’m not doing that for anyone, because — like I said — I’m not a biologist, and I don’t sell wood chippers.
Wow….
Your friend must actually be a fag.
You two really love elaborating about your faggotry and projecting your faggotry onto others, but I’m not into fags, so I don’t need anymore information from either of you.
Your fantasies/sizes/fetishes are entirely irrelevant to me, as I do not share your interests in fags, not at all, but — that said — I would happily punch both of you in the balls, and that’s as far I’m willing to go.
Lmao..,
Now, you’re referencing Cable Guy, a Jim Carrey movie, Hollywood cinema — oh, the irony.
Your friend would probably tell you stop watching Brokeback Mountain and start watching Breaking Bad. Your friend would probably punch you in the balls, demand you stop being a fag, tell you to keep your “deep bond” to yourself.
Your friend would probably tell you to shut your ass up and just watch the show, that you should waste less time showing people your asshole and spend more time forming some educated opinions.
Your friend would probably acknowledge your love for Jim Carrey via an intervention: ALL your friends would probably inform you, very gently, how your love for the fag doesn’t mean you need to talk out your ass or kick your own ass.
How long have they lived in the house? Maybe, it’s nothing more than a set.