5
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's manspread science, and I'm going to need the whole bench here.

2
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the same worthless tweet URL as the OP.

"BREAKING—Sources in the area reporting that Ever Given (Evergreen) ship freed from Suez Canal has been unloaded. Possible Navy Seal involvement. Details to come."

What sources? How many containers were unloaded? How, without cranes? There's drones flying around the boat taking video; why haven't we seen it? "Possible" Seal involvement? Where is this congresswoman getting her information? If it's classified, why is she blabbering? If it's not classified, why be so coy with the sources? No need to play cocktease, honey-dear.

Do you know a "fact" is? (You claimed to be able to provide them, and called me a shill for doubting you.) A fact is a thing that is certain. Possibilities, by definition, are not certain.

4
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the "opponent" has either of those, it is far from "vanquished".

I'm not necessarily tired of hearing trust-the-plan, but I am tired of hearing about it from people who claim certainty of knowledge ("we have the goods") when they do not have an inside track.

1
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 1 point ago +2 / -1

"...hosting "kill russian babies" parties...."

How easily some of you are fooled by the Putin media.

3
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only four of them are downvoting, which is considerably lower than what I would expect.

0
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 0 points ago +1 / -1

What Seal operation? ....If there's one of those going in the Suez, we're not being told about it, and nobody being hit is complaining about being hit. No sounds of gunfire report, nothing interesting on drones.

So, by all means, feel free to "provide some facts", shilllllll.

0
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 0 points ago +3 / -3

"I'm assuming..."

That's a bad habit.

1
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 1 point ago +4 / -3

They're weren't gangsters. (For example, how many countries did Trump invade? Now ask yourself how many countries Putin invaded.)

2
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 2 points ago +4 / -2

He's a gangster with nukes. What more is there to know?

5
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 5 points ago +7 / -2

Hey, the last person who believes in the validity of election results has been located.

3
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 3 points ago +6 / -3

Putin is Cabal. He's just a different Cabal.

2
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 2 points ago +8 / -6

It's an "invasion" when you try to get your own Crimea back that Russia invaded in 2014?

How easily some of us are tricked into cheering Putin attempting to put back together the Soviet Union, as if that were somehow a good thing. Ever.

-3
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 -3 points ago +2 / -5

What makes you assume that the US Navy has intel on what's in every container on that ship? And those containers are loaded in a precise order to distribute weight evenly. Whence is the US getting authority to impound and unload a Japanese-registered ship in Egyptian waters carrying bound-for-Europe cargo? (Have they been asked by Egypt?)

2
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump has carried an umbrella up the flight-stairs before. (And then he left it laying unclosed on the floor of the gangway like a total chad.)

1
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 1 point ago +2 / -1

Pro-Putin pumpers inbound in 3...2...1....

Caveat: Who knows anything about the CNAS?)

2
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can an accumulated total user score go negative? Let's find out....

4
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 4 points ago +4 / -0

Honest Ahmed's Used Cars is having a sale, and has hired robo-floodlights to light up the sky.

8
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 8 points ago +8 / -0

We're not only watching a movie, we're IN the movie.

4
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pepe check. ...eyes left.... Drat.

5
UnkaSlamMissingBot17 5 points ago +5 / -0

No. It's not big enough.

view more: Next ›