Pay attention to the quality of the evidence though
People saw this shooter actually shoot.
Is anyone saying they eyeball witnessed a second shooter.
This could just be things they heard. Or assumed before they learned they shooter was on the rooftop.
Easy to get things wrong in situation like that.
The big tell for me is it's been Friday night, Saturday, Sunday and now Monday are those people coming forward to identify these second shooter.
Or did they get home, watch the news and realize they were mistaken.
So Trump's real security team is part of a coverup?
The same rooftop?
The photos we have are two year old photos from high school.
So he easily could have grown his hair long.
Based on what?
Why didn't they just keep firing?
Trump was still on stage for a while ?
The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final “acoustic impulse” was emitted by a possible weapon C,
3 shots by the kid on the roof. Counter Sniper fire and something with may not a shot at all.
Yes of a guy who is just out of high school. He's 20 years old. The yearbook photo looks very much like his graduation photo so it's probably his senior year photo.
Do you think his looks drastically changed in the past 2 years?
Is there a more recent photo?
I don't know your source
How would they get a picture of that?
This photo is like 2 years old, right?
This will be repealed.
That's not really a likely story
It's just an easy story to come up with.
There's obviously return shots that killed the kid on the roof.
So having "3 shooters" does not mean having three shooters firing at Trump.
What picture should they use?
Um it was the last rally before the convention. Good possibility, he would have announced VP pick
- I believe there is a fixed ladder attached to the building
One thing I could think of is maybe the sauce was liberal site and they didn't want to show that.
The math may be correct and I agree that a plan to knick someone's ear is not really a plan
But it's weird to make a claim like this with no sauce.
Mathematicians have proved that the assassination attempt on Donald Trump could not have been staged.
Which Mathematicians? Where?
It's a commercial building which means it probably has a ladder of fixed to the side of the building already. This is how maintenance workers access the roof
I think they sound fairly alarmed as it was dawning on them something was wrong. It would be sort of a stunning thing to see I imagine. Hard to believe it was happening.
It seems like the alarm and the concern happened later in the video. But not up front.
I was trying to look at it from their POV. We know now that guy's a shooter and that guy is a danger, but would I have in the moment recognized that danger immediately. And I think I probably would.
Like a guy crawling on a roof. Super weird right? Especially if you had to go through security and see police everywhere. Yet, it feels like it takes a while for the alarm bells to go off.
I think what happened with this guy was there was a shot of the shooter with long blonde hair. And this dude thought it looked like him. He commented on that first picture and somebody on Twitter who seemed like a friend who knew him was like dude. No way.
So then he took a picture in his house in that pose where he's like from behind looking over his left shoulder.
So he posted a picture of himself because he resembled a picture taken of the shooter and it just blew up like insane
I can certainly imagine it.
But I have worked with film and video going back to the pre digital days. And the way this appears jumped out at me immediately as hinky. I can't recreate that frame unless I have my arm fully extended away from body and then point with my other hand. If I did it normally, you see way more of my hand and It comes in from the side of the frame. The only way to get your fingertip coming in from the bottom of the frame is to not point but carefully place your fingertip under your phone. Try it, see if I'm crazy.
The other thing that jumps out at me is the voices themselves.
There seems like there's authentic audio later in the video. But early in the video you have people who do not sound like they are out of political rally and just notice someone on the roof. I would immediately associate that with danger. They do not act scared. They're not excited. What they sound like is someone describing the video they are watching. Not someone in the scene reacting to their environment.
The woman's voice when she said he's laying on the roof is super super casual.
It's hinky.
How do you come to me this belief?