October 7th is the perfect example of what I would try to describe to counter this considering there were people who claimed the guards stood down I believe. What if Israel wants Iran to attack them to create sympathy as a longer-term strategic move?
Does O'Keefe seem like controlled opposition to anyone else? Like, sure he gets "insiders" to leak things, but half the time it seems like lower-level employees speculating stuff based on gossip and those people seem to be just as in the know as the rest of us.
From my understanding, what other people said was that it is indeed an AI translation. So, the voice in English is generated by AI. However, it was an actual interview done in a different language. So, the interview is legit, but the voice isn't.
My standards for the media are a bit different than individuals. I'm a little bit more okay with censoring propaganda that comes from allegedly credible sources, but of course the certifiers of what's credible can become compromised and all of a sudden, the enforcers of that turn into the propaganda agents.
It seems like if you were going to do something like that, you'd be a little better at planning it than doing it right in the face of a camera. They could have prepared it in the ally, thrown it, and ran back in the ally.
I wouldn't say doomers are on the other side. It shows intelligence to doom sometimes. We can't just go forward with no skepticism. What if the Q plan was going smoothly, but then suddenly the deepstate coopted it? Are we just supposed to continue to trust at that point? There's a difference between genuinely not being on the side of truth and being a skeptic.