It's so bizarre how the movement went to "If Kamala wins, she's going to drag us into a war with Iran and raise gas prices!" to "Yeah bomb the hell out of Iran! Boots on the ground yeah!! We can take the high gas prices if it means bombing Iran!"
Iran is a clown show operated CIA country like North Korea. So Kamala would never go to war with them. Forget the normies and the fake outrage. We’re on a Q board and Q specifically told us Iran was on the timeline. We are here. We are closer to the Storm.
Still, I can understand begrudgingly being behind the war and trusting Trump and Q. What I don't understand is the people that are thrilled about the war when those same people were anti-war just last year. It's like, do these people have original thoughts at all?
One huge difference - Trump not heels up. I honestly do not believe this will be a forever war under Trump. I also knew ahead of time that Iran was up for "handling". Q made that abundantly clear. Nothing happening under Trump would have occurred under idiot. No Gulf States support and backing, no swift action.
I would have been opposed had Trump not been the one running this operation.
different people talking now vs them? you only notice it because the types of people commenting changed, individuals probably didn't all the sudden flip like you are implying, just one set of people stopped commenting vocally and another set started
Kamala was going to bomb Iran? She couldn't even make it to the border when she was the border czar. Gas prices are up? Can't you see how temporary that is. Haven't you been paying attention to what President Trump did in Venezuela, and is doing in Iran. Soon gas prices will be the lowest you've ever seen them. "While we look not at the things that are seen, but at the things that are unseen" Faith sees it before it happens.
I'm taking that as a master troll comment. Who is their god that was humiliated last night? Like Elijah on Mt Carmel mocking baal. Or the ten plagues on Egypt's gods before the Exodus. I think it was Trump insulting them on the highest level.
Both Islam and Christianity have roots in the same Abrahamic God.
The division occurred with the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, when Abraham had another son with Keturah who was named Ishmael.
Isaac went on to form the lineage that led to Christ and Christianity, and Ishmael went on to found the lineage that led to Islam.
That President Trump would reference Allah speaks to perhaps a time in the near future when the contention and division between Christians, Islamites and Jews might finally be healed, as the shadow of darkness is purged from this world by the returning light.
POTUS' reference of "Allah" is a powerful message of unity and a reminder that we are all of one human race and one divine source, regardless of what may have divided us over the millennia.
Allah is the moon god. There is no relation between God the creator and the pagan moon god of Muslims.
POTUS called on their Allah as an insult, because they say ‘Allah will protect us’.
His inference is, ‘Let’s see if Allah protects you’ while all hell ‘reigns’ down from the sky.
"Allah" simply means "the God" in Arabic (al-ilāh). It was used pre-Islam by pagan Arabs as a title for a high/creator god (above lesser deities), but also by Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews long before Muhammad to refer to the God of the Bible—the same Creator worshipped by Abraham. Arab Christians still use "Allah" in their Bibles, prayers, and worship today.
Islam claims to worship the same God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and the prophets, while viewing itself as the restored pure monotheism (with Muhammad as the final messenger). Theologically, there are major differences from Christianity (e.g., strict unity vs. Trinity, Jesus as prophet not divine), but linguistically and historically, it's the Abrahamic God referred to in Arabic.
The moon god claim often confuses "Allah" with other pre-Islamic figures like Hubal (sometimes linked to rain/war, not consistently the moon) or outdated 19th/20th-century theories. The crescent symbol came later and isn't ancient proof of lunar worship.
Regarding the POTUS comment: That's political rhetoric playing on the phrase, not a serious theological point about "pagan moon gods." Muslims see Allah as the one true God who protects the righteous — same as how Christians or Jews might invoke divine protection. Whether bombs "reign down" is a separate military/political question, not evidence that their God is fake or lunar.
Bottom line: It's the same monotheistic God tradition (via Abraham), expressed in Arabic with its own theology—not a revived pagan moon deity. The "moon god" meme persists in some circles but doesn't hold up under scrutiny.
To bring Q into the discussion . . .
Q Writes in post 1656 that they want us divided.
One of the major divisions they promote is the psy-op of the differences in the faiths of the world. Q writes that they want us divided by religion and religious wars.
Trump = Q+
As part of the Q team, POTUS would not invoke the name of Allah as some spiteful divisive term, as he would be going against the very unity that Q and Q+ teach in their Socratic method.
We are at a time for unity of faiths, not division. The time to break down barriers, not build them up.
You can believe what you will, but I choose to believe that it will take all of humanity united as one divine people to take down the Global Cabal and cast them out once and for all.
I think you are on the money, but I think there is a bit of mockery going on but not in like a “mocking the people” that choose the religion.
He is talking to extremist radical islamists, not peaceful Muslim civilians.
He is giving them a last olive branch and almost saying like “look I will speak your language, if it’s Allah you pray to then you better take this deal now, in Allahs name or you will burn in hell.”
Bro, it literally just means “God” in Arabic. Arabic speaking Christians (of which there are many) who loath Islam used “Allah” in their translated bibles because it means God. Chill.
lol it’s based as fuck. It’s like an Uno reverse, oh you pray to Allah? Well praise be to Allah when the bombs reign down and you’re in HELL.
It’s almost like a compassionate last olive branch look I will “speak your language”
After all when the bombs are reigning down on them they aren’t going to be shouting “OH GOD OH JESUS!”
It was a very simple and elegant JAB…. When I read it I laughed hard…. “Oh the bombs will rain down… and you’ll all pay in hell… praise be allah” lmaooo
What other president has the BALLS to say something like that?
We are long past worrying about labels of racisim and xenophobia… think President Obama would invoke their God Allah while talking about how he was gonna nuke the piss out of them? Lol
First of all, Donald Trump isn't known for dropping an F-bomb. Something is off.
Secondly, the whole tone of the posting was odd... the "Praise be to Allah" part being the worst, but also stating that the U.S. would take out Iran's Power Plants and Bridges.
I bet this was comms for a very different idea.
The U.S. doesn't want to destroy Iran's civilian infrastructure, especially knocking out power to 90 Million people (most of whom hate the regime or are just trying to get by). Destroying the power also knocks out water treatment and water supply to the cities, refrigeration of food, shuts down hospitals... again not something we want to do.
The "Praise be to Allah" and Power Plants and Bridges might be the key here.
Iran's mullahs rule Iran through the mosques. There are large mosques in every city, and those are the power centers of indoctrination, Islamic rule and repression of the people. That network of mosques is the beating heart of the Mullah regime and it's means of control over the nation of Iran.
Trump may be signaling for the destruction of every major Shiite mosque in each major city in Iran. Destroy the Mullah's Power Centers and Bridges.
It could also signal destroying the oil pipelines supplying Kharg Island, which that island's ship terminals and tanks handle 95% of Iran's oil shipping. There are 3 main pipelines from the mainland to those terminals. Every one of the pipelines can be destroyed at a valve station, in such a way that it can easily be repaired by the incoming new regime... but will shut down Iran's oil shipments to ZERO until those repairs can be made in a month or two from now. There are also electrical feed cables to Kharg Island to provide electricity for the pumps and ship loading. POOF the power cables. They also can be repaired in a month or two when this is over. We don't have to take out Kharg Island... but just make it useless for Iran and shut off all of their external oil sales for a bit.
I've never understood the “comms” idea, especially if it's supposed to be communication to our own military or allies.
At a basic level, this just doesn’t hold up.
The US military already has secure, encrypted, and well established systems for communication. Orders and coordination don’t require vague public statements on social media, and doing it that way would create confusion, risk misinterpretation, and expose plans to anyone watching.
Same thing with allies, there are already direct diplomatic and military channels built for this exact purpose. Public messaging isn’t how serious coordination gets done.
If the argument is that it’s meant to confuse the enemy, that doesn’t really work either. If people on a public message board can decode it, then there’s no reason am enemy couldn’t do the same, or at least monitor it in real time. Hell, all it would take is just parking someone in here, or even just using AI to scrape the forum, and the enemy will know what all of these comms mean, which completely undermines the use of them.
If the argument is that secure channels are compromised, then switching to completely public communication would make that problem worse, not better.
So on a practical level, I don’t see the purpose, it’s not needed for coordination, it’s not secure, it’s not exclusive, and it’s not a reliable way to communicate anything important.
If anyone could point out what practical, logical use that using comms like this would be, I would genuinely appreciate it, because like I've said, this is something that has made zero sense to me from the start and really bothers me because obviously I'm not seeing what others are seeing everywhere.
Why? What is the purpose of giving us comms? What exactly are we supposed to do with them? Other than spend hours, days, months, and years trying to figure out what they mean?
For something to truly be "comms", all parties involved need to have a standardized set of information to draw from, that's agreed on before hand.
That's not what we have here. Quite frankly, it's just guessing. And we have an absolutely horrible success rate of determining what these "comms" are. Basically it's just guessing and projecting what we want to happen into the comms.
I know that it's going to really make people angry at me for saying this, but it just seems like a very elaborate game. People spend hours and days and even years hunting through old posts and drops, trying to finagle numbers that match up to what they want things to mean, making elaborate collages with the ever popular red lines linking various bits and pieces, etc.
And for what? What are we supposed to do with this information? That we get wrong the vast majority of the time?
I would start listing off all the failed "comms" interpretations that I've seen since I came here shortly after J6, but I'm sure that would get me sent to time out for "dooming". Just go back and start reading old chats and you can see for yourself. You can sort them by "top" and "all time" and it will take you way back and you can just start going from there.
Maybe the White Hats are monitoring our comments to see how well we see through the crap, which I believe you do very well.
If we 'pass' then we are ready for the next step. When I say we, I'm not just talking about anons, I mean everybody.
Doesn't it seem like we are repeating some things? For instance, we dealt with Biden for four years so we could see how bad things can get. Well, we must not have learned enough because it seems we are repeating it with Mamdani. (We means everyone.)
Election integrity, we just keep going round and round, but still not enough people standing up.
I think this is taking longer than even the White Hats predicted because we were more asleep that they anticipated.
For this particular 'communication', they are hoping enough people say what you just said or at least something like, "This is just a movie, everything is bs.", so we can move forward.
That doesn’t line up with what we've repeatedly been told, though.
If we’re "watching a movie", then everything is already scripted and our role is passive.
But if things only happen when people are "ready", then it’s not a movie, it’s dependent on random public behavior.
Same problem with "trust the plan". Either it’s controlled and already set, or it depends on millions of people acting a certain way. It can’t be both. Because you can't have a set plan based on what millions/billions of people might possibly do in the future.
And again, it completely overlooks the fact that "comms" have to be a standardized set of data that all parties know and agree upon, ahead of time. Otherwise, it's just guessing. And based on reading this board for the past 5 years, we don't have the best track record of guessing correctly.
I want to be clear that I 100% believe there is a plan. I simply don't agree with what so many other Anons believe, like all of these "comms" being everywhere. And it's not like Anons can't be wrong about things.
Unfortunately it seems like what the loudest/most agressive/most active Anons say is supposed to set the narrative for what we're all supposed to believe. And if anyone disagrees, then they're called a doomer or shill or retard.
And when those Anons are proven wrong, well, they just pivot, come up with a brand-spanking-new theory to work with and conveniently forgets how very wrong they were the last go around.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but you're not providing an alternative either.
using your logic why would Trump have any reason to say any of the things he says? it's not comms so it's _________?
this is where I also struggle because sometimes I think just like you express and then I try to come up with the opposing argument and every time the opposing argument just falls flat.
for me to fill in that blank the only thing that makes sense would be that Trump is just trying to Garner attention and puff up his ego reading Twitter comments. And that would suck if he was actually that shallow.
It's so bizarre how the movement went to "If Kamala wins, she's going to drag us into a war with Iran and raise gas prices!" to "Yeah bomb the hell out of Iran! Boots on the ground yeah!! We can take the high gas prices if it means bombing Iran!"
What the absolute fuck happened?
Iran is a clown show operated CIA country like North Korea. So Kamala would never go to war with them. Forget the normies and the fake outrage. We’re on a Q board and Q specifically told us Iran was on the timeline. We are here. We are closer to the Storm.
Still, I can understand begrudgingly being behind the war and trusting Trump and Q. What I don't understand is the people that are thrilled about the war when those same people were anti-war just last year. It's like, do these people have original thoughts at all?
One huge difference - Trump not heels up. I honestly do not believe this will be a forever war under Trump. I also knew ahead of time that Iran was up for "handling". Q made that abundantly clear. Nothing happening under Trump would have occurred under idiot. No Gulf States support and backing, no swift action.
I would have been opposed had Trump not been the one running this operation.
different people talking now vs them? you only notice it because the types of people commenting changed, individuals probably didn't all the sudden flip like you are implying, just one set of people stopped commenting vocally and another set started
How much closer to the Storm?
Speak for yourself.
40,000 innocent protesters caused my mind change, and their begging Trump for his help, as they got louder with their threats to us.
Kamala was going to bomb Iran? She couldn't even make it to the border when she was the border czar. Gas prices are up? Can't you see how temporary that is. Haven't you been paying attention to what President Trump did in Venezuela, and is doing in Iran. Soon gas prices will be the lowest you've ever seen them. "While we look not at the things that are seen, but at the things that are unseen" Faith sees it before it happens.
it's a minority of shills pushing that opinion, most people are against this.
"Praise Be To ALLAH?" WTAF You cannot be serious.
I'm taking that as a master troll comment. Who is their god that was humiliated last night? Like Elijah on Mt Carmel mocking baal. Or the ten plagues on Egypt's gods before the Exodus. I think it was Trump insulting them on the highest level.
THIS!!!!
Allah = God
Both Islam and Christianity have roots in the same Abrahamic God.
The division occurred with the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, when Abraham had another son with Keturah who was named Ishmael.
Isaac went on to form the lineage that led to Christ and Christianity, and Ishmael went on to found the lineage that led to Islam.
That President Trump would reference Allah speaks to perhaps a time in the near future when the contention and division between Christians, Islamites and Jews might finally be healed, as the shadow of darkness is purged from this world by the returning light.
POTUS' reference of "Allah" is a powerful message of unity and a reminder that we are all of one human race and one divine source, regardless of what may have divided us over the millennia.
u/#lord
Allah is the moon god. There is no relation between God the creator and the pagan moon god of Muslims.
POTUS called on their Allah as an insult, because they say ‘Allah will protect us’. His inference is, ‘Let’s see if Allah protects you’ while all hell ‘reigns’ down from the sky.
From Grok:
To bring Q into the discussion . . .
Q Writes in post 1656 that they want us divided.
One of the major divisions they promote is the psy-op of the differences in the faiths of the world. Q writes that they want us divided by religion and religious wars.
Trump = Q+
As part of the Q team, POTUS would not invoke the name of Allah as some spiteful divisive term, as he would be going against the very unity that Q and Q+ teach in their Socratic method.
We are at a time for unity of faiths, not division. The time to break down barriers, not build them up.
You can believe what you will, but I choose to believe that it will take all of humanity united as one divine people to take down the Global Cabal and cast them out once and for all.
u/#q1646
I think you are on the money, but I think there is a bit of mockery going on but not in like a “mocking the people” that choose the religion.
He is talking to extremist radical islamists, not peaceful Muslim civilians.
He is giving them a last olive branch and almost saying like “look I will speak your language, if it’s Allah you pray to then you better take this deal now, in Allahs name or you will burn in hell.”
We're in the minority but you're absolutely correct.
It sounded and read just like trolling to me.
Bro, it literally just means “God” in Arabic. Arabic speaking Christians (of which there are many) who loath Islam used “Allah” in their translated bibles because it means God. Chill.
Hear hear.
lol it’s based as fuck. It’s like an Uno reverse, oh you pray to Allah? Well praise be to Allah when the bombs reign down and you’re in HELL.
It’s almost like a compassionate last olive branch look I will “speak your language”
After all when the bombs are reigning down on them they aren’t going to be shouting “OH GOD OH JESUS!”
It was a very simple and elegant JAB…. When I read it I laughed hard…. “Oh the bombs will rain down… and you’ll all pay in hell… praise be allah” lmaooo
What other president has the BALLS to say something like that?
We are long past worrying about labels of racisim and xenophobia… think President Obama would invoke their God Allah while talking about how he was gonna nuke the piss out of them? Lol
He's not, he's mocking them.
Just another masterful bit of trolling from the Troller-in-Chief.
Trump is a Christian.
First of all, Donald Trump isn't known for dropping an F-bomb. Something is off.
Secondly, the whole tone of the posting was odd... the "Praise be to Allah" part being the worst, but also stating that the U.S. would take out Iran's Power Plants and Bridges.
I bet this was comms for a very different idea.
The U.S. doesn't want to destroy Iran's civilian infrastructure, especially knocking out power to 90 Million people (most of whom hate the regime or are just trying to get by). Destroying the power also knocks out water treatment and water supply to the cities, refrigeration of food, shuts down hospitals... again not something we want to do.
The "Praise be to Allah" and Power Plants and Bridges might be the key here.
Iran's mullahs rule Iran through the mosques. There are large mosques in every city, and those are the power centers of indoctrination, Islamic rule and repression of the people. That network of mosques is the beating heart of the Mullah regime and it's means of control over the nation of Iran.
Trump may be signaling for the destruction of every major Shiite mosque in each major city in Iran. Destroy the Mullah's Power Centers and Bridges.
It could also signal destroying the oil pipelines supplying Kharg Island, which that island's ship terminals and tanks handle 95% of Iran's oil shipping. There are 3 main pipelines from the mainland to those terminals. Every one of the pipelines can be destroyed at a valve station, in such a way that it can easily be repaired by the incoming new regime... but will shut down Iran's oil shipments to ZERO until those repairs can be made in a month or two from now. There are also electrical feed cables to Kharg Island to provide electricity for the pumps and ship loading. POOF the power cables. They also can be repaired in a month or two when this is over. We don't have to take out Kharg Island... but just make it useless for Iran and shut off all of their external oil sales for a bit.
I've never understood the “comms” idea, especially if it's supposed to be communication to our own military or allies.
At a basic level, this just doesn’t hold up. The US military already has secure, encrypted, and well established systems for communication. Orders and coordination don’t require vague public statements on social media, and doing it that way would create confusion, risk misinterpretation, and expose plans to anyone watching.
Same thing with allies, there are already direct diplomatic and military channels built for this exact purpose. Public messaging isn’t how serious coordination gets done.
If the argument is that it’s meant to confuse the enemy, that doesn’t really work either. If people on a public message board can decode it, then there’s no reason am enemy couldn’t do the same, or at least monitor it in real time. Hell, all it would take is just parking someone in here, or even just using AI to scrape the forum, and the enemy will know what all of these comms mean, which completely undermines the use of them.
If the argument is that secure channels are compromised, then switching to completely public communication would make that problem worse, not better.
So on a practical level, I don’t see the purpose, it’s not needed for coordination, it’s not secure, it’s not exclusive, and it’s not a reliable way to communicate anything important.
If anyone could point out what practical, logical use that using comms like this would be, I would genuinely appreciate it, because like I've said, this is something that has made zero sense to me from the start and really bothers me because obviously I'm not seeing what others are seeing everywhere.
You're probably right and have a very rational point of view.
it's comms for us on the board. simple.
not for the military, not for allies, and not for enemies.
simple straight, comms for autistic anons.
Why? What is the purpose of giving us comms? What exactly are we supposed to do with them? Other than spend hours, days, months, and years trying to figure out what they mean?
For something to truly be "comms", all parties involved need to have a standardized set of information to draw from, that's agreed on before hand.
That's not what we have here. Quite frankly, it's just guessing. And we have an absolutely horrible success rate of determining what these "comms" are. Basically it's just guessing and projecting what we want to happen into the comms.
I know that it's going to really make people angry at me for saying this, but it just seems like a very elaborate game. People spend hours and days and even years hunting through old posts and drops, trying to finagle numbers that match up to what they want things to mean, making elaborate collages with the ever popular red lines linking various bits and pieces, etc.
And for what? What are we supposed to do with this information? That we get wrong the vast majority of the time?
I would start listing off all the failed "comms" interpretations that I've seen since I came here shortly after J6, but I'm sure that would get me sent to time out for "dooming". Just go back and start reading old chats and you can see for yourself. You can sort them by "top" and "all time" and it will take you way back and you can just start going from there.
.
Maybe the White Hats are monitoring our comments to see how well we see through the crap, which I believe you do very well.
If we 'pass' then we are ready for the next step. When I say we, I'm not just talking about anons, I mean everybody.
Doesn't it seem like we are repeating some things? For instance, we dealt with Biden for four years so we could see how bad things can get. Well, we must not have learned enough because it seems we are repeating it with Mamdani. (We means everyone.)
Election integrity, we just keep going round and round, but still not enough people standing up.
I think this is taking longer than even the White Hats predicted because we were more asleep that they anticipated.
For this particular 'communication', they are hoping enough people say what you just said or at least something like, "This is just a movie, everything is bs.", so we can move forward.
That doesn’t line up with what we've repeatedly been told, though.
If we’re "watching a movie", then everything is already scripted and our role is passive. But if things only happen when people are "ready", then it’s not a movie, it’s dependent on random public behavior.
Same problem with "trust the plan". Either it’s controlled and already set, or it depends on millions of people acting a certain way. It can’t be both. Because you can't have a set plan based on what millions/billions of people might possibly do in the future.
And again, it completely overlooks the fact that "comms" have to be a standardized set of data that all parties know and agree upon, ahead of time. Otherwise, it's just guessing. And based on reading this board for the past 5 years, we don't have the best track record of guessing correctly.
I want to be clear that I 100% believe there is a plan. I simply don't agree with what so many other Anons believe, like all of these "comms" being everywhere. And it's not like Anons can't be wrong about things.
Unfortunately it seems like what the loudest/most agressive/most active Anons say is supposed to set the narrative for what we're all supposed to believe. And if anyone disagrees, then they're called a doomer or shill or retard.
And when those Anons are proven wrong, well, they just pivot, come up with a brand-spanking-new theory to work with and conveniently forgets how very wrong they were the last go around.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but you're not providing an alternative either.
using your logic why would Trump have any reason to say any of the things he says? it's not comms so it's _________?
this is where I also struggle because sometimes I think just like you express and then I try to come up with the opposing argument and every time the opposing argument just falls flat.
for me to fill in that blank the only thing that makes sense would be that Trump is just trying to Garner attention and puff up his ego reading Twitter comments. And that would suck if he was actually that shallow.
🤷♀️
There are a lot of capital letters in that statement. I am wondering if it's a Gematria code ?
Again, for who, and what purpose?
Q# 4958
I forgot how to post it.