Yeah, if you want to nitpick graph rendering minutia then we can see the blue line isn't perfectly vertical either: https://i.imgur.com/0Q4PbHO.png
Yup, I'm not dismissing the possibility of fraud here, but a large increase like this is not inherently fraudulent.
This is showing republican and democratic votes separately. A vertical jump on either line just shows a certain number of votes reported for that party. What you're describing is if one of the parties went vertical while the other stayed horizontal for that timestamp.
There's a corresponding vertical line for republican at the same time in this graph: https://i.imgur.com/M9K4Ftk.png
All of the lines on a chart like this are perfectly vertical. Tabulation centers aren't reporting ballots one-by-one. In the chart in this image there's a very clear vertical line for republican votes too, not sure what you mean.
Al Jazeera is also reporting it as Cat 3 landfall
The storm struck Florida as a Category 3 storm late on Wednesday after weakening from a Category 5 storm, leaving more than three million homes and businesses without power and killing at least four people.
Facts are facts
It's definitely not the $62k model, that one is massive, look at the picture on the model: https://www.tiffany.com/jewelry/necklaces-pendants/tiffany-hardwear-bold-graduated-link-necklace-72741978/
If it is from Tiffany, then it's this one: https://www.tiffany.com/jewelry/necklaces-pendants/tiffany-hardwear-link-necklace-GRP09651/
I mean, we know for a fact that the article was edited after it was published, since it embeds a tweet from 9/16. That, alone, raises suspicion, which is corroborated by archiving.
It's more so just about who can rally more of their followers to participate in the poll, I think. I think X definitely just leans right as well, but conservatives are also just better at spreading polls around for people to vote on. Like those Krassenstein guys post polls all the time and they always have Trump winning even though the Krassensteins are very liberal.
So, then the government just sees the VPN provider's server accessing it and takes action against them?
You're trolling, right?
It's absolutely clear all of them voted. Otherwise, how would this be evidence of the fraud?
Where is your impression that this is evidence of the fraud coming from? Texas just released numbers for how many voters were purged from registration rolls. They've not said these voters voted while they were invalid. Please read the article. The headline used for the post here is incorrect (as far as we know from reporting on this statement).
What? Are you seriously saying they all died at the same time? That's just nuts... no-one died of COVID, if that's what you mean.
No... This is voters removed due to death since September 2021. The people who were registered when they died in October 2021 are included in this number, as are the people who were registered when they died in April 2022, etc.
I guess there's nothing wrong with the 2020 election then?? This is just accepting the government line, which is always false.
... What?
Yeah, but then who used those registration details to vote?
There's no evidence that these 457k people voted. This post's title is incorrect, read the article.
And why wouldn't they be removed when they died?
They are removed. The SoS goes through death certificates once a month or so and removes people. 457k deceased people were removed since September 2021.
And it still doesn't explain why they were registered to vote in the first place
Huh? People register to vote in elections. People also tend to die at some point after they do that.
They were registered when they were alive. They died. Sometime later, the SoS cross referenced death certificates with voter registration rolls and removed the deceased individuals. That number was summed and resulted in the 457k number reported.
No... they registered to vote and then died at some later point. The numbers cited are the totals for the past 3 years. ~230k people in Texas die every year.
No, that's not absolutely clear. These are people that were registered to vote, not people who had recently voted.
It's AF-2 and tail numbers were removed about a year ago.
https://www.twz.com/air-force-c-32-jets-are-going-incognito-under-new-security-policy
Yeah plane stuff is super easy to verify because with unique planes like this, there's more likely than not somebody taking video/pictures of landings and takeoffs.
Here's one from 8 months ago: https://youtu.be/z3UlzM6hj6k?t=95
Political parties are free to choose their nominee as they see fit. The constitution is concerned only with candidates. A nomination is just the party saying, "This is the person we want to represent our party's platform".
Yeah, not seeing a filing anywhere, seems like bullshit to me.
Yeah, it's just the perspective.
Pink shirt you can see in the phone preview can be seen here: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/president-of-the-united-states-joe-biden-delivers-off-the-news-photo/2159970183?adppopup=true
And the dark barrier with the circular logo can be seen here: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/president-of-the-united-states-joe-biden-delivers-off-the-news-photo/2159978541?adppopup=true
It's been mostly down for more than a year: https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
The site has been on life support for a while. The Podesta emails section has been down quite a bit, and I think searching the Hillary emails was also broken for a while.
She did take her husband's last name, though?
Dana Bash, Jeremy Bash. She was born Schwartz. Didn't update it after her second marriage in 2008 though.
Why do you think there's some time component for the vote additions? It's just a discrete datapoint with a timestamp: at this point in time, the vote total changed to x. Any slope you see in the line is a result of how it was rendered, and it will be present in spikes of both republican and democratic votes.