You know, the main problem is that people are stupid sheep, and most young people can't afford the basic requirements to start a stable family. Don't get me wrong, stupid crap like this undoubtedly exacerbates the problem, but the bulk of it lies in the fact that most are stupid sheep who just follow "the current thing" (in this case for most women it's being a "girl boss"), combined with the fact that no 20 something year old can support themself, let alone a gf/wife and 4+kids on a salary anymore. Usually not even on two salaries if the woman is working as well.
If you were to eliminate all of the false media narratives being pushed by social media and the MSM about what people believe and "what's actually cool/preferred/acceptable", and give people non-monopoly money in livable amounts, then the population would skyrocket to the point of a second generation of baby boomers.
This has more or less been proven in Hungary and Poland, Hungary and Poland have pretty traditionalist morals and have resisted the globalist homosexual feminist brainwashing pretty well overall. Especially when compared to other Euro Nations. As a result, the feminist "Girl boss" crap doesn't really exist there.
Likewise, while they haven't gotten rid of their monopoly money, they HAVE established a means of financial incentive for younger and middle aged people to have more kids. For example, in Hungary, a married couple actually has an inverted tax rate based on the number of children they have.
If a married couple in Hungary has 4+ Children, and doesn't get divorced, then they pay zero federal income tax, and zero property tax on personal property for the rest of their lives. This not only gives them more money for their family, but also incentives buying a home for said family.
In doing this, Hungary has just about doubled their birth rate in the past 10 years. It's still less than it should be (that's just how low it was before they started this), but it's still growing every year.
Now combine family oriented incentives like this with the use of non-monopoly money that has actual value and goes much further. Boom, Instant Baby Boom.
Of course this doesn't apply to every nation. Western Nations will have a much easier time doing something like this because our culture is so much different than eastern nations.
Japan for example, well to be blunt, I believe they're pretty much screwed. They've tried the exact same policies, on top of literally giving away free houses to people under 40 if they get married and/or have children. And it's only slightly raised their birth rate.
This is because the culture of Japan is so much different than a western nation. They typically have a weird herd mentality type culture. For example, a job isn't a place to work for yourself to make money for you and your family. The company IS your family and is your provider, so they work ridiculous hours with little overtime, benefits, etc.
It's a concept known as "Black Companies", and it's one of the reasons why Japan, and most other Southeast Asian nations, have some of the highest depression and suicide rates in the world.
You can give young people all the free houses you want, and increase the value of their money all you want, but if they have no time to themselves to enjoy anything, and are constantly overworked and unappreciated because they're easily replaced, then they're not going to have the motivation to go out and date, marry, start a family, etc.
The solution for western nations is relatively simple, and has already had proven success in Hungary and Poland. Give young people actual money, a living wage, and destroy the media brainwashing. Do this, and you'll basically see a modernized version of the 50s again because the sheep will just follow "the new thing" to be part of the crowd.
The East is a bit more up in the air, as I really don't have an answer on how to fix their mess, given it's so ingrained in their very culture.
Yeah, you obviously don't know what you're talking about. A fine isn't a credit debt (like what you keep referring to with receiverships). It's a fine. Two legally distinct types of debts.
Second of all, I don't know what you don't seem to understand about that 4th amendment here. It prevents Trump from having to surrender his personal property (he wholely owns the entire company), to the government for any reason other than owed back taxes. If nothing else, he would simply have to pay the fine, not surrender control of his properties and liquidate them.
And finally, a quick look at Trumps ACTUAL website proves you wrong on where his property concentration is.
A grand total of 71 unique properties, of which 25 reside in NY. So yes my obviously exaggerate 99% wasn't true, but 65% of the Trump Groups assets and property lie outside of the Jurisdiction of NY. In fact, 18 properties, or a little over 25% of the Trump Groups assets/Properties, are in foreign nations, where not a single judge in the United States has Authority to "dissolve the organization".
For the record, Mar-A-Lago alone has an estimated Value of a little over $300 MIllion. So considering Trump's Estimated Net Worth is $2.2 Billion last I checked, Mar-A-Lago makes up 13.6% of his Net Worth.
The majority of Trumps Net Worth DID fall in New York at one point, but that's not true anymore. The majority of his Major properties have lost value and income over the past several years as NY, Chicago, etc have run the cities into the ground. On the other hand, Florida, where Trump has 7 Large scale properties, is where the largest portion of his Net Worth is now located, because property values and cap rates (The financial measure of income generated from real estate) have sky rocketed in Florida and other Southeastern States in the same period of time.
If you wanna get technical, all of his Indian Properties are up there now too since India is becoming China 2.0 in terms of economic growth, meaning it's a hotbed for rapid development.
Only when it's a publicly traded company. The Trump Group is a wholely owned privately held company. The rules are different for governing public and private companies.
And it usually is, but real estate is wonderfully unique in that the rules applied to real estate are often different and unique compared to say, a stock trading firm. A stock firm in receivership can be forced to liquidate its assets to pay back its customers if it's found to have taken part in fraud.
This is different. They're saying that Trump inflated the values of his properties to achieve loans that he didn't qualify for. Those loans have all been paid off. The only debt Trump has is a recently refinanced loan one of his NY properties and a mortgage on that building he partially owns in California that he took out a cash out refinance on.
The loans they're claiming he fraudulently received have been paid back for years, ergo they can't force him to liquidate his assets and give up control, as there isn't anyone to pay back.
And no, they couldn't ask for a complete dissolution, as the Trump Group is an international organization spanning roughly 15 states, and 28 countries. The Judge has zero jurisdiction or authority over 99% of the properties that make up of the Trump Group.
And the Judge made the move (legal jargon) to prevent Trump from being able to move his assets, but it was never approved by the courts. The fact that Trump sold the DC Hotel/Post Office is proof enough of that, as if I remember correctly, it was Incorporated in NY when Trump first bought the 99 year lease on the property.
100% false as well. The judge made a move but it was never approved. Likewise, I don't know what you don't understand, they can't force him to give up his private property for this under the fourth Amendment, since there's no backlog of property taxes owed.
Likewise, if nothing else, one can simply convert everything into a Sole Proprietorship, which has a unique status as both a corporation and an individual and doesn't require a business license.
Trump isn't losing his properties, so stop trying to insist otherwise.
100% false, they can't legally force him to sell his properties, as that would violate the 4th amendment since it would be unconstitutional seizure of his personal property.
He's not being charged with anything that can legally result in the forfeiture of his property, the only thing they've done is cancel his NYC business licenses. By simply transferring the businesses to out of state entities, this circumvents their ridiculous attempts at trying to bankrupt Trump.
Not trying to be mean here, but Trump's lawyers are full of crap quite often. They put up weird facades whenever the next attack comes, but there's always a simple solution 99% of the time.
For example, they also mentioned Mar-a-lago in all of this. Both the "judge" and Trump's Lawyers.
There is 0% chance Mar-a-lago will be effected. It's in Florida, held in a Florida LLC. Not a single Judge in NYC has authority in Florida, not even the Federal Judges, as Florida is in a completely different Judicial District.
The whole "Trump may lose control of X property" thing is nothing more than fear mongering. If nothing else, all he has to do is create a series of Trusts for his kids, listing himself as the co-beneficiary and the Trustee. Thereby retaining control, retaining his income, and simplifying the inheritance process for his kids.
And? That has no bearing to anything I said. By transferring the disputed assets to legally independent entities in red states, and red districts, you basically set up a giant wall between yourself, and the corrupt DAs who keep doing crap like this.
All the Monitor does is keep track of all the internal financials. What I'm suggesting has no bearing on that, all it does is take the assets out of the legal jurisdiction of the soros puppets.
Well the "judge" ordered the properties custody be turned over to three independent entities, so if he tried to turn them over to a different LLC in say, Chicago (Since he owns quite a few buildings in Chicago), they they'd probably either throw a fit, or just have the Chicago DA do the same thing.
Hence it'd be a safer and more convenient path to just make new LLCS held by trusts in the most Trust/LLC friendly states (which are the ones I listed, sans Tennessee, which I forgot about).
Not exactly, they just ordered the dissolution of the LLCs in NY.
Basically, this is a common practice in real estate, to set up each and every building you own as its own separate business (in the form of an LLC), for both tax and liability purposes. They're not "dissolving the Trump Group", and they can't even touch the non NYC buildings he owns.
The only thing they CAN do is force him to create new LLCs outside of NYC and NY to now own and operate the properties, which is basically what they're doing. Essentially, the only thing they've successfully done is lose business tax revenue, since there's a 99% chance that Trump will just set up a few LLCs that are owned by independent Trusts in Florida (of more smartly, South Dakota, Delaware, or Nevada), and then everything is settled.
I mean, this is obviously hypocritical and I loathe the government for doing it, but 15 years? You mean to tell me that they couldn't apply for permanent residency or citizenship for 15 years? That's literally triple the amount of time needed to become a citizen.
They always have been since the early 1800s. It's only recently that they started trying to count them as seperate, and the only reason they started doing that is because they want to push the narrative that white people are dying out and that the minorities are taking over. The opposite is actually true in most places, well if you don't count the illegals anyway.
But I digress.
I don't disagree, but the problem here is that since the 70s, there's been a collaborated effort by the cabal, banks, hedge funds, billionaires, etc. to artificially suppress the price of precious metals (specifically silver, but gold to an extent as well). Ergo, the price of neither is well adjusted to inflation.
The whole "an ounce of gold will still buy a good suit" comparison is faulty because of this. An ounce of gold will buy you a "low end" nice suit. Not the luxurious clothing that it would during Roman times. THAT level of clothing is priced more in the $10K+ range, and goes all the way up to multiple $100K for the absolute best suits.
Likewise, silver is the single most suppressed asset in the world. That's not up for debate. Between naked shorting, spoofing (banks and hedge funds putting out fake order to drive prices down that they never intend to collect on), and paper orders (where dealers will sell the same piece of metal up to 100 times because delivery times are typically long and they have at least a year to replace it for each order), silver is drastically below what it should be. The usual estimate is that there's 550k Metric tons of silver in the world.
This is false. A good portion of it has been destroyed in the production of various electronics. For decades it was deemed unrecoverable and thus was literally junked with zero recovery. Only recently have techniques and technology come online that allow for silver recovery from electronics, but it's still not widespread because it's not economically feasible in 99% of situations.
That number also includes the spoofs and paper sales in it. Most credible estimates say that between the fake/paper silver (that doesn't really exist), and all of the silver that's been destroyed in the process of making various types of electronics since the 70s and 80s, there's actually less available silver in the world than gold. (There's more silver overall since we have a lot of unmined silver, but the readily available supply is much lower).
That's what this post was about, less about speculation, and more trying to throw out predictions and discuss the effects all of this will have when this stops.
Silver IS mainly for preserving wealth, but in this very unique circumstance, there's pretty much a 100% guaranteed chance that silver stackers are gonna see a large increase in the value of their silver from what they originally paid for it.
For decades, they've been buying silver (and Gold to an extent) for less than it's worth because the cabal was trying to prevent people from actually preserving their wealth as they siphoned off more and more of the wealth of the middle class. At the same time, the actual supply of physical silver has been decreasing (more is used in tech production than is mined every year), And there's also the fact that Gold and Silver are being used to back the new non fiat currencies the nations of the world are going to be using post cabal (meaning there will be a massive international demand for both metals that will far outstrip supply)
All of this combined leads to the undeniable conclusion, that silver (and Gold to a lesser extent) is going to see a post cabal increase in value.
Say we revert back to the USD value in 1930. Back then Silver was a little over $6. Because of all the above mentioned factors, while the USD will be worth more and go further, Silver won't revert to $6 an ounce. Rather, using the estimates from my previous post a year that I mentioned, Silver would be between $660 and $1,650 an ounce.
That's the equivalent of between $12K and $30K in current Federal Reserve Notes. For a silver stacker with a few hundred to a few thousand ounces, that's retirement money.
Hence, the discussion, since this is the type of thing that can, and will effect peoples lives post cabal, in a big way.
By the time this happens, the "Death of the "D" Party", will have already happened like Q said it would. Ergo, there will be no one to protest it.
Because YOUR response would lead to that situation, and you're accusing me of saying something I never said (abolishing capitalism).
I kind of figure that it'll be a situation where things will be "prorated" if that makes sense? Like, US based bond holders will STILL be honored, but instead of current face value, they'll be prorated to match the new USD instead of the Federal Reserve Note.
For example, a $1000 Bond will now pay out, say, $20, but that $20 is worth what it was in 1930. These numbers probably aren't correct, but I can't be bothered to do all the inflation/deflation adjusted math right now. I think I've got the point I was trying to make across though.
Well lots of people seem to think we're going to see a complete and total collapse. I personally don't, but I do see a giant crash coming that will tank everything, which opens the door to reverting to a gold/silver backed currency (especially with the value of Gold and Silver sky rocketing without all of the artificial pressure being put on precious metals to keep the prices low by the colluding banks, hedge funds, etc.)
I was just thinking about what will happen during that collapse since I'm trying to use what happened to Iceland during the 2008 Crisis as a basis. They defaulted on their foreign debt, and just kept the debt they owed their citizens and domestic corporations, and now they're one of the only nations on the planet without a deficit and their money is actually worth something, but back then there was a lot of panic over everything.
It's honestly a really hard topic to research since there's so little about it in English. Most of the articles I've found are in Icelandic or Dutch.
How is that at all what I said? You're the one talking about allowing the current oligarchs to rule over us in the "post cabal world" by essentially handing them a feudal peerage to rule over while the rest of us struggle to find something to pay for basic necessities with.
I personally believe the opposite is true. It doesn't HAVE to lose value, we could simply just default on our debt and convert to a "new" system of asset backed currency. Don't get me wrong, I do believe there will be a rather sizable loss of purchasing power (there already has been), but everything going to zero just isn't an option in my mind.
And yes, things DO have to be "peaceful and calm". If people start shooting each other in the streets over basic necessities, then it's the exact same scenario as what the cabal wants.
My personal theory, is that we'll probably see a stock market crash worse than the great depression, which will drag everything else down with it (like currency losing 50% of it's value), which will result in us converting into an asset backed currency since gold and silver will be worth infinitely more without all the artificial pressure by banks, hedge funds, governments, etc. to keep the value down (it's generally accepted that silver SHOULD be worth between $5K and $50K and Gold should be worth between $50K and $100K based on inflation alone, but various cabal financial ogranizations collude to fix the prices and keep them down to the level they were at in the 80s for the most part.)
Assuming the generally agreed upon values are roughly true, then our current US Gold Reserves would be more enough to cover every dollar in circulation. And even more so if we retire a large portion of the currency to increase the value to pre central bank levels.
Of course that's just my theory, but it makes the most sense to me with the info we have.
Yeah, no offense, but that's the dumbest take I've ever heard. You want to talk about wealth inequality, that's literally the best way to reset us to the feudal age. Let people start from zero with whatever physical assets they have. So people like gates who have hundreds of thousand of acres of land, and billions of dollars in real estate get to be the new aristocracy while your average joe has maybe a few thousand dollars in gold/silver to their name?
That's the exact opposite of what we're trying to do here.
See that doesn't set well with me. That's the type of thing that will cause a mass panic, leading a Mad Max Scenario. If people think they've literally lost everything, then there's no incentive to not devolve into tribalism. There has to be SOME kind of order to things to keep it peaceful and calm, otherwise we just end up in the exact scenario the cabal wants us to be in.
Besides, in this scenario, your physical gold and silver aren't going to be worth anything. Not like you can go to the local grocery store with a silver ingot and pay for your groceries, especially if there's not groceries coming in because the farmers aren't being paid. And there's the fact that roaming bands of bandits would probably just rob you for supplies while you're in public as well.
So yeah, in this scenario Gold and Silver are just as, if not more worthless than the bonds and cash. The only things of value would be food, water, medical supplies, and weapons/ammo.
Not really, most often people will do what is called a "limited conservation easement". Basically, it just freezes the property taxes on the land in exchange for never allowing any non agricultural development on it.
In layman's terms, it essentially allows farmers to freeze the taxes on their land, so that no matter what happens around them development wise, their taxes can't be increased, while also preserving farm and ranch land.
Often, if done right, it can also help farmers pass on their land to their children without having to worry about paying the estate tax too (since farmland is REALLY expensive, and a few hundred acres of prime farmland, combined with all the equipment needed to farm it, can easily surpass the $25 Million mark).
So yeah, I get the concern, but 90% of the time, it's actually a good thing, since it's preventing farmers and ranchers from being screwed over by nearby developments that might raise their property value to an extent that they can't afford their land anymore, thus forcing them to sell.
I wouldn't be so sure, lots of people in MA are REALLY tired of this crap, and they have the same problem as states like Colorado, Illinois, and Nevada. You have a single large city/metropolitan area (Denver, Chicago, Lad Vegas, and Boston), that more or less controls the entire state. So long as you can cheat enough in that single large metro, then the state "appears blue". I'm not saying boston isn't full of crack head liberals, but I don't think the state as a whole is actually blue. If NY and CA aren't blue, then MA isn't either.
VA is red, they just have the same cheating problem as every other state.
Still not accurate. NM, MN, and VA are hands down red as well at this point sans cheating.
And to be completely honest, if you completely discounted ALL cheating, then you can add pretty much every state to that list. I FIRMLY believe, that the only truly blue states, are Vermont, Rhode Island, and Delaware. I used to include Hawaii in that, but after what's happened down there, I refuse to believe that they'd still be blue.
The only reason I say Vermont, Rhode Island, and Delaware are blue is because their populations are so small, that it'd be REALLY hard to cheat like they do in every other state without anyone noticing. So the only explanation I can come to, is that those three states are legitimately blue. But I firmly believe that every other state is some shade of red.
Well yes and no. The problem with complaining about CEO pay, is that in 99% of cases 90% of their pay is in the form of stock options. Take musk for example. His actual salary is minimum wage, but his stock options are worth billions of dollars since Tesla is so valuable. Meaning his compensation is almost entirely non-cash.
Now of course this doesn't mean that they aren't actually getting that money, it's relatively easy to get an asset backed loan with ridiculously good terms on stock, especially if you're the CEO of said company since there's understood to be an incentive for you to make the stock go up at that point.
Likewise, not EVERY CEO is born from nepotism. Quite a few companies have a "bottom up" approach, for their Executives. I loathe giving them any form of credit, but Walmart is an example of this. The current CEO of Walmart, started out as a literal bagboy, and worked his way up the corporate ladder.
Overall, it's less about the CEO being paid exorbitant amounts for doing very little. It's that they have an agenda handed to them by their overlord's because they're compromised. Most of these people DO have at least a semblance of understanding about their companies. It's just that they have an agenda forced onto them.
Most people seem to misunderstand the C-Suite roles when it comes to stuff like this. Their job is to basically be overseers of the company and guide the general direction. It's basically impossible for a single person, or even a team of 10 people, to oversee every little aspect of a large organization. Can you imagine the CEO of GM overseeing every little aspect of vehicle production from the glass being tempered, to the nuts and bolts being machined, to the finance department, to the design and engineering department.
All of these different departments are highly specialized and have literally nothing to do with each other as far as skill sets go. Asking someone to have moderate knowledge in every single one of them is just unreasonable. Hence, why Operating Manager (Usually a VP) tend to be the ones to oversee the day to day, while the C-Suite act as overseers in order to make sure the corporate machine is well oiled and properly functioning, while being able to adapt to a changing environment.
Yup, this is the main problem. The simple solution is to let the sheep be sheep, and just change "the thing" they all follow. I'm not saying it's a perfect solution, but it's the easiest to implement.
Think about how easily these exact same people sway their opinion based on what they're being told by the talking heads on the various forms of media. All you have to do is use the gullibility by replacing the "girl boss" mentality being the "accepted and cool thing" with normal traditional things.
The movement to do jus that has been growing for the past several decades. The "Tradcon" movement if you will. Once things like divorce, and whoring around are seen as "socially unacceptable", by the majority of people in the mainstream, then these exact same narcissists will stop doing what they're doing and do a complete 180, primarily because they're narcissists.
They want, no NEEED to be part of the "cool group" if you will. So whatever the majority of people find to be the most acceptable and "idealized" is exactly what they'll do. The majority of these people have no unity. They "believe" conflicting things because it's "Popular" to do so. For example, the majority of these people will support both muslims and gays, despite muslims literally stoning gays to death in the street. Support of these two groups is not really compatible to anyone with two braincells to rub together, but they'll support both "because it's socially positive" to do so.
That's why once all the cabal brainwashing ends, and peoples true feelings about the various aspects of society and types of people become mainstream, they'll have whole new personalities overnight.
Mark my words, I guarantee when the cabal falls, and the false media narratives about how Christians are evil, and traditionalism is oppressive and evil finally die off, 90% of these people will overnight convert into "Good Christian people with traditional values".
And I'm not mocking Christians or traditional people there, I'm mocking these buffoons. They'll just change their facade to whatever they think will get them the most societal approval, because they're sheep. It's not exactly ideal, given most of them will be faking it all due to their narcissism. But it's still better for society as a whole that they "pretend to be traditional moralists" rather than continue the acceptance of debauchery they we currently have.