2
changeagent 2 points ago +4 / -2

This is poor judgment.

These observances were not wokeness. Wokeness pigghy-backed and hijacked them.

This will backfire bigly, as it should. It feeds the false narrative that Trump is racist.

Getting rid of pride month is good, though.

6
changeagent 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mighty fiiiiine

And you?

(I don't know why I am feeling so silly this morning, but sometimes this Board is where it comes out)

4
changeagent 4 points ago +4 / -0

You callin' me a sucka???

All right, then. You a sucka, too.

13
changeagent 13 points ago +13 / -0

And here comes the parade of dipshits who will say that they will fight against Trump's tyranny by continuing to preach their bullshit, in 3... 2... 1...

1
changeagent 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't follow your point. What is it that I am saying that I don't know about and is therefore not real? I stated/implied that as a fed contractor I have experience with talented and committed fed employees. I am not saying that your statement is wrong. I'm stating what I've experienced. So I don't follow your point, exactly.

1
changeagent 1 point ago +1 / -0

It must be a challenging decision. I wish you the best in your discernment process, and thank you for being a dedicated fed employee.

1
changeagent 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's something I absolutely agree with. Let's hope they are not too dismayed by the chaos.

1
changeagent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Current fed contractor, and my experience is different.

4
changeagent 4 points ago +4 / -0

Your logic is backwards.

If they are good, then they're smart and they will see this charlie foxtrot in the making and they will bail and find gainful employment elsewhere.

Ifthey are dolts, they don't want to leave because they know they cannot make it in the real world. So they will be too scared to leave.

Edit: and we see this all the time in the private sector, especially during mergers, or when slow times occur... the talent leaves ahead of the turmoil.

1
changeagent 1 point ago +2 / -1

If they are smart enough to take it. I bet a lot of the dumb and bad ones will think they can hide... and, don't forget that if they are shitty fed workers then they probably don't want to have to go look for a real job. The bigger irsk is that smart and good fed workers will take the offer and high-tail it out of their fed job so as to avoid the chaos, and to find good employment elsewhere. It's risky, which is my only point, really. I just would have done it smarter.

0
changeagent 0 points ago +2 / -2

Oh, I'm prepared. But there are way too many who are not. How many are on this Board? 100K? That's not even a drop in the ocean.

And shock and awe could have still been acheived without it risking so much else.

But, I'm prepared, and I'm ready for those who are not. Buckle up.

3
changeagent 3 points ago +3 / -0

So he's saying that we've been tricked into demanding Ivermectin which accomplishes the same long term negative outcomes that the cabal desires? Really? I don't know. And I don't have time to dig right now.

-2
changeagent -2 points ago +1 / -3

This is risky, to be honest. There are really good and talented federal workers... what if they are the ones who decide to leave?

In all honesty, this could result in the precipice. Do you realize what services would stop, along with the funding freeze?

Don't get me wrong... I am all for the overhaul of gov. But there is a way to do it over 6-12 months, not a shock and awe tactic that ruins the lives and good workers and their families.

Furthermore, people will need time and money to learn new skills to become employees in the economy, especially if they are trying to replace their income and benefits.

Prepare accordingly. Major depression and clusterfuck on the horizon if a lot of people take the offer, combined with thefrozen funding. Seriously, this is not a popcorn thing. I am very surprised.

2
changeagent 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's needed, but I hope they move fast to identify the good and the bad. There is a lot of good work done by good people and they will be very negatively impacted. And that would not be good at all. The number of people impacted is astounding, and even if only 30 percent are good people/programs and worthy of the funding (and I happen to think it's more like 70 percent are good/worthy), then we are in for a catastrophic shock if this lasts longer than 1 month.

1
changeagent 1 point ago +1 / -0

I still don't follow. I get the sense that he is putting out proof that he is traveling interdimensionally, and this is an empty Phoenix in a different dimension.

9
changeagent 9 points ago +9 / -0

I just want him to make it so big that it can be seen from space, like the Great wall... and Trump can say Chy-nah again... I love when he says that.

31
changeagent 31 points ago +31 / -0

I also wonder... does this mean the great roundup might be habbening?

Or, what other reasons might all of social media in the military be locked down?

9
changeagent 9 points ago +9 / -0

Very cool connection.

I am hoping that there is some number or something else that ties the announcement or the start date to that Q post.

Is it that the Sec Def was confirmed on the day ofthe announcement and the phrase is included? Pretty solid proof, still.

view more: Next ›