Really? You have enough facts to know that that was all I could negotiate? You must be one of those morons who walks around touting his accomplishments all the time. Again, nice try.
I don't think I've explained that scenario well enough. It's not tied to what's going on today. But it was just an example that making cuts without a plan is not prudent, and leads to a lot of hurt and broken lives.
Haha... Europe. looks like you have done a good job with your own.
I don't care what you think I am . You're wrong about me. And you didn't even take the time to understand my point. Now go whack off looking at Elon.
Quite the extrapolation. You must be a good reader. Dumbass. I am self-employed too, numbnuts. One of my clients happened to be a fed agency. Try harder.
Of course there are swamps at all levels. This happened in 2003 in my state. A red state. Way before draining was on the radar.
Nice summary. Inaccurate. I have and have had many other private sector contracts. Nice try. You're a bit butt hurt, I think. Maybe friends with that Glad cuck.
I had hoped, but the slow drip method seems to be the protocol.
I hope so. I hope they are protected, too.
Your assumptions just prove that you're a dildo. In someones ass, nonetheless. Come out and see reality.
I am in business for myself in the private sector. One of my clients happened to be a Fed agency. Are you that stupid? Oh, sorry... forgot... you're a dildo in someone's ass.
Good insights. I am not aiming to get my contract back, actually. I've already pivoted.
Regarding his email, I think that strategy is flawed. With his experts they could have cross examined the databases very easily and determined who was real wand who was not. This was a public stunt.to satisfy his ego. My opinion.
You are a simpleton.
You're original. And obviously incapable of much thought.
I remember when my state said that it would close mental health hospitals, and use the savings to create community based servcies.
They close the hospitals, but did not help community based services get started.
Result? The need was real and went from being met to now being unmet. People with real SME, who are the reason we have a safety net... and they are screwed.
What was gained? Saved some money.
If we cut the fed gov by 90%, and expect that either states or the private sector will fill in the gap and deliver the necessary value (even if that value was less than the 90% of the gov that was cut), we will be a country in chaos. Cutting without a plan is dangerous.
Identifying fraud and exposing it and ending it s perfect. Lumping it all together is a blunder.
With betting.
You probably haven't much of an understanding of what is being accomplished by the Federal gov.
There are things the States should do, and many States won't do them, so we need something to create consistency across the country. Consider mental health services as an example. If you have a SME, you're fucked if you live in a state that doesn't care.
You are worthless.
Absolutely agree. And I would bet that if you were in charge, you would not have used a "reply with what you did last week" email. That was not a great tactic, as many good employees were told it as not real and therefore didn't reply. Many are being told that it is not legal what he is doing. So, pretend you don't know what you know as an Anon, and pretend that you are a Fed employee doing your job... and you are being told that it is not legal, and you are being told not to respond. See the confusion? It was a flawed tactic. But it's Elon, and anything anti-gov must be good.
Predictions?
None of the big names... we need to ease into the list and get the whole world paying attention and looking for the next name.
Predictions?
None of the big names... we need to ease into the list and get the whole world paying attention and looking for the next name.
Is that the offical Cabinet uniform?
I think if you scroll down it says, "You'll find out why in 2 weeks."
Immediately... as in, 5 trading days... $5000
Then... I think all bets are off. It will continue to climb, but more slowly. If a reset to the gold standard is implemented to save the dollar, then an ounce of gold needs to be north of $40K, I think, if I remember other posts correctly.
Can that happen if there is no hyperinflation? Can gold simply be revalued at that amount, and then we go and take gold that is ours (because it was stolen, maybe), and suddenly we have a lot of gold and our dollar is still alive without suffering hyperinflation?
I don't know the answers to my questions. Nor do I have any sauce.
Excellent. Thank you!
That's nice coming from a Mod
And I am not saying they should have been kept open, or not. I don't know enough. I just know that a lie was sold to the communities that then inherited a lot of mentally ill and homeless people and didn't have the resources to help them. Much like a small town in Ohio inheriting a bunch of Haitian refugees, but there were not that many mentally ill people. Just similar in principle.