There is no federal corporation; municipal corporations are merely organized polities. There is no risk of mass dissolution, or whatever other weird crankish shit you have convinced yourself is imminent.
That said, if your intellectual standard permits to you think von Reitz is a serious figure, I can understand why you would also think all this NESARA/GESARA nonsense is a thing.
Yawn. My version of the law is the one recognized within the United States and without. Anna von Reitz' exists in her head, and, apparently, in yours.
That's fine; my version will continue to dictate the way things actually happen.
No; the Chief Justice is only and always required to preside if the president is being tried, and the ‘claim’ is that that is not the case, since Trump is no longer the president, although he was when he was impeached.
Huh? The point is that the sovereign citizen nonsense is not an actual description of the legal machinery by means of which things happen, at law. It exists solely in the minds of people who know nothing about law. Nothing actually happens in the real world that corresponds to it.
If the claim is that there is in effect a legal system that is nowhere enforced, enacted, used, recognized, etc., then you don't know what it means for a legal system to be in effect. You can talk about sovereign citizen nonsense and the United States being a 'corporation' all you like; it's complete gibberish as a legal matter.
Not really. We have multiple sources attesting that not only Trump, but previous presidents, including Obama, largely used the button to order lunch, drinks, and other such things. It's an intercom.
The media coverage of it is ridiculous, but there are numerous accounts of it being used to actually order drinks.
We have multiple sources attesting that not only Trump, but previous presidents, including Obama, largely used the button to order lunch, drinks, and other such things. It's an intercom.
The media coverage of it is ridiculous, but there are numerous accounts of it being used to actually order drinks.
It's certainly not bullshit; you can be wrong, as many people here have been about a great many things. If we grant that Q is obliquely describing something, that hardly means that any of inferences here made about what it is or when it will happen, etc. are accurate.
This sovereign citizen nonsense is precisely that - nonsense. The American legal establishment, including the courts, recognizes none of it. It's not some sort of mystical legal truth that is being suppressed; it's just gibberish that will get you laughed out of any court.
Thomas and Alito didn’t hold that Texas had standing because an injury was done to it; they simply hold that SCOTUS is obliged to hear all cases in which it has original jurisdiction. Both also went out of their way to note that they would not have granted relief.