They shapeshift depending on what is beneficial at the moment. There are lots of videos of Jews pretending to be white and when confronted, admit they are Jews.
NOT MY WORDS! THEIR words...
JEW ADMITS "WE ARE WHITE WHEN IT IS CONVENIENT" - https://www.bitchute.com/video/AaozRrHcmZHW/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LFt6WQaXDdOc/ One
Look up the song "I'm not white, I'm Jewish"
https://www.commentary.org/articles/liel-leibovitz/jews-are-not-white/ - No, Jews Aren’t White - We’re our own thing, and whatever privilege we possess is conditional - by Liel Leibovitz
There are soooo many more but I've got to get back to work.
Therefore God exalted him to the highest place >and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, >in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
THIRD TIME I've asked for a quote now and you keep weaseling out of it.
Which quote, directly from the Pope and translated correctly, misrepresents illegal immigrants?
You make a lot of claims but have nothing but opinions to back up what you say. Let's stick to facts and not hearsay and speculation. You're being very intellectually dishonest.
To you all — I am sorry you’ve lost so much. You got swept up in a movement that gave you purpose and offered knowledge and understanding, but it was a lie. It’s hard to admit you’ve been conned when you’ve paid such a high price, but it’s the only way out of the daily suffering that Qdom brings.
From the guy who is paid to troll. Yeah its US that got swept up though. Tell David Brock this isn't going to end well for him.
Gaslight harder, glowie.
Fox News/OANN/Breitbart/Newsmax (plus a thousand different blogs-disguised-as-news-sites) yank everyone’s attention to the latest threat-of-the-week and conveniently-right-wing talking points = Jewish/Neocon alt-right
TWIST TWIST TWIST
Your argument that you need it to come directly from him or its just a mistranslation is a weak cop out.
Literally not what I said.
The article I sent to you explained why he said what he said and how the guy asking him a question set up the question to be a "gotcha!" question and you want to keep going.
Put the direct quote here and I'll put the direct refutation to it here. Maybe that will make it PERFECTLY clear and easy for you to see where your hang up is.
He never specifically addressed Trump, the guy setting up the question and then asking the question did.
His message was not about Trump specifically and as the article points out, the Pope isn't necessarily following American politics, especially at the time the question was asked.
The Pope is speaking in generalities in this answer. That isn't hoop jumping. He is responding to the specific question asked by the interviewer who was clearly trying to provoke a specific response from the Pope. You are twisting the article to meet YOUR bias.
I told you this is what they do to the Pope and they want Catholics and non-Catholics to be disgusted with the Pope and the Catholic church so they set them up for "got'cha!" questions or click-bait worthy answers. You are never given the full context and the journalists are generally vehemently anti-Catholic. Gee, but I'm the one with a bias?
Again, this is the same kind of treatment Trump received. They've been doing this to the Catholic church even longer. The media is not going to fairly report on anything Catholic because the media is run by Freemasons and Jews who have planned FOR YEARS to destroy the Catholic faith.
Figure it out. Or don't. You clearly want to hate the Catholic church and the Pope. Strange prejudice you got there. Anti-Catholicism is the last acceptable prejudice Americans have.
Thanks for your time.
The repeated message he gives is that we should just keep accepting more and more migrants even if it is a detriment to ourselves.
Can I see the quote?
AND the catechism of the Catholic church specifically addresses this!
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2241.htm
CC 2241 The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.
Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants' duties toward their country of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens.
Recent article on his efforts to persuade Europeans to accept more Migrants- https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2023/09/25/lampedusa-africa-migrants-pope-francis-246145
Did I miss the part where the Pope gave an actual statement of the matter? His FULL statement? Not some opinion of someone else. This is the same problem we have with Q...editorialized pieces on what Q is about instead of reading the drops directly.
That first article won't load for me. Is there a direct quote from the Pope or is it an editorial piece on what the Pope supposedly said...again?
Strickland deserved it - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEFE-s2M2g&pbjreload=102
Did you hear the letter he read? Yeeeeeeah.