20
horseyPatriot 20 points ago +20 / -0

She works in a Psy Ops unit. She is part of this, just like DeSantis with his JAG experience. I always watch for those with relevant military experience…

3
horseyPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

😂 Except the pink slime. I’m guessing he didn’t eat it when that was happening?

2
horseyPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

But I also wondered how a Presidential candidate was home enough to tame two ravens?

3
horseyPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is an incredible story. but also so sad. I hate crows 😡

1
horseyPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn’t matter what he wants in this scenario 😊 Yes, he could resign and Trump appoints someone else?

But I think all of the latter Amendments will get a scrub and will they survive?

4
horseyPatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

So weirdly, this is the now the first link offered when you search for US Constitution. The original. Weird huh. Never happened for me in all the other times I’ve searched!

3
horseyPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m looking to find a link. Cannot find it on Insta right now…

1
horseyPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it is just very odd the Kennedy very weirdly said he was still a presidential candidate.

Yes, Vance is helping Trump get elected. I agree. I just don’t see him being there at the end after 1/6.

1
horseyPatriot 1 point ago +2 / -1

To be more clear, if Trump and Harris tie in electors, the vote goes to the House. The Senate would then choose a VP from the list of Presidential candidates. You know how Kennedy said that he is still a candidate? Makes more sense now. He will be in the list that the Senate uses to select a VP!

5
horseyPatriot 5 points ago +6 / -1

The Vance pick has seemed odd to a bunch of us. Sharon McMahon on Instagram had a bit about Article 2 Section 1 Clause 3 today and a light bulb came on, for me.

Q told us that the people would come together. But they weren’t ready for a Trump/Kennedy ticket when this election cycle started. Qs posts about the end of the Dems and the recent bubbling up of Crowdstrike into the news BIGLY - means that the people will know who Crowdstrike is when news about the DNC server hits.

Kennedy is no longer a Democrat - he is clear of whatever will taint the Democratic Party.

1
horseyPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Vance pick has seemed odd to a bunch of us. Sharon McMahon on Instagram had a bit about Article 1 Section2 today and a light bulb came on, for me.

Q told us that the people would come together. But they weren’t ready for a Trump/Kennedy ticket when this election cycle started. Qs posts about the end of the Dems and the recent bubbling up of Crowdstrike into the news BIGLY - means that they will know who Crowdtrike is when news about the DNC server hits. Kennedy is no longer a Democrat - he is clear of whatever will taint the Democratic Party.

1
horseyPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, we have heard it. But a whole bunch of new people are going to hear the story for the first time.

They will see Trump not as the MSM portrays him. Remember how many people realized the media was lying to them about Trump when he appeared every night on TV for the Covid briefings?

3
horseyPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only preview is available currently. It should be a doozie!

2
horseyPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Put Elon Musk in charge of running the program😁 Guaranteed he will decrease cost and I crease efficiency of the process. I’m still in awe of what he has done in the space program.

1
horseyPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m okay if he is using the $ from sales of Rothschild assets or the gold from the Vatican bank!

10
horseyPatriot 10 points ago +10 / -0

Ha. I forgot also. But the thought just came to me… what if it was foreshadowing by white hats. Q called them clowns. The Q team updated the Law of War manual, leaked the Clinton/Loretta Lynch meeting to that reporter, and (I believe) we’re behind the Weiner laptop getting to the NYPD.

3
horseyPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I attended the inauguration in 2017 and that was pure magic. 2016 was kind of a blur with 2 kids in college living at home. But one of the Millenials that I worked with bought a cardboard Trump, kept him in his office, and we all had fun that year cheering on the guy who was not a politician. It was a fun year as we imagined him beating Hillary Clinton. The “You’d be in jail” statement at the debate was talked about forever. I was lucky to work with so many young libertarians who adopted and respected Trump.

2016 was special for us after we had high hopes for the Tea Party yet saw the 70 or so new conservatives go to DC in 2010 and fade into RINO land. It also was dark for me as I stumbled onto Pizzagate and watched it unfold on Reddit.

I’m much older than you. I was lucky to have Ronald Reagan as my Command In Chief for some years. Those were magical years to be as we rebuilt our military and watched the Iron Curtain fall. A dark cloud started to descend back over the country afterwards. It got darker with 9/11, the wars, and later with Obama. Trump running was a glimmer of hope. His election that night was magical. I felt like Baron looked as they announced him winning that November night. It was a long night as I fought to stay awake. I laughed at the thought of Hillary being too drunk to come out and give a concession speech.

Yes, 2016 was special.

4
horseyPatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are so locked in. TDS to the max. I’ve been arguing with the idiots on FB. You cannot break their beliefs that Trump will be the worst President ever. Especially since RFK’s family doesn’t support his move 😂

1
horseyPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I agree. Or they kept operating as they were to let the underlings and government commit their crimes. A whole lot of sealed indictments have been created since then.

2
horseyPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just ordered the 1997 version of the book. Good post, thanks for posting this!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›