No, this is trash because it's 4 degrees of hearsay. Read the entire document not just the highlight.
Someone (Marcineau) says, they heard someone (Mooley) saying, that they heard someone else (Echevarria) say something about someone else (Jews)
This wouldn't pass muster in middle school let alone an elite research board
Oswald was more than a patsy. This pdf very clearly outlines that Oswald was working closely with the CIA to help assassinate Fidel Castro. It's also known he was in Russia for a period of time. He could've been a double agent or himself hired to do the deed if the CIA was directly involved.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/157-10014-10109.pdf
There's a PDF with almost 700 pages that I believe is of great significance and is meant for us to be the detectives. Most of it is newspaper clippings and handwritten notes, so while your method is useful it will miss so much of significance. Much of this will have to be done by hand.
If there was some way to crowd source this, so we can optimize the time spent and reduce redundancy, and pool the work together into an online database. I'm not that technologically savvy to organize it.
This is the document I mention at the beginning https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/157-10014-10242.pdf
"This is a big one" as GEOTUS would say... Anyone heard of Jim Braden? This basically pins it on the mafia
Start on page 33: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/157-10014-10242.pdf
edit: of note, #14 in that document is almost entirely omitted with just a fragment appearing at the bottom of page 45.
This seems pretty important, dated 1961. In a letter to POTUS titled "CIA Reorganisation," Schlessinger lays out what is wrong with the agency and what steps should be taken to address it (and break it up)
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/176-10033-10145.pdf
This appears to be a duplicate: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/176-10030-10422.pdf
Why do I have a feeling section 10 was the really important section?
Am I reading this thread correctly? "There is no such thing as antisemitism" while also: Let's blame Jews whenever possible.
No one on these boards seems to know the difference between the Jewish race and Zionism as an ideology, which is aided and funded by all races and creeds.
I spent a while some years ago trying to find anything at all on this and I couldn't find anything, not a single thing tying Chester and Chris to a documentary with or without the child trafficking.
Of course absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, but there seems to be no originating source to the original claim that spread like wildfire.
How many Jews follow the Talmud? Even most Orthodox which are a tiny minority, don't. Most western Jews are conservative or reform. Most don't even observe Shabbat fully which is one of the primary covenants in the Torah. Let alone do whatever the hell you're talking about.