1
patriotic_legend 1 point ago +1 / -0

yep, I didn't catch it, just saw it in other people's comments so wanted to make sure you were aware.

3
patriotic_legend 3 points ago +3 / -0

I saw that after posting this, the full apolgy.

1
patriotic_legend 1 point ago +1 / -0

not sure if the link changed, but I just clicked it and it is an apology that the woman's name is unknown. As I said before delete this post, it is false makes us look like gulible faggots.

2
patriotic_legend 2 points ago +2 / -0

where is the link. I fucking hate when pictures with no links are posted.

fyi others below are saying this is AI photo and not real. Produce a link or delete the post.

2
patriotic_legend 2 points ago +2 / -0

they must have. Although, looking at what's in the bill that was passed it is very different than the first. So they took the dem pork out and decreased the pages by 95%.

But, what they didn't do is start a precedent of single issue bills, which is what we really need.

So the deep state kicked the can down the road on having a fight with MAGA, but passing a clean bill which is better than it initially looked.

Of course, we need to see what the Senate does, my guess they will add in some pork send it back to the House who will vote yay on Christmas Eve.

2
patriotic_legend 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hear you, we don't know who created the image, canaries or someone else. If it came from someone else no foul, Clandestine may not have seen canaries post (it didnt have many views).

But if he pulled the image from canaries he should have stated this when posting.

I don't spend a lot of time following any of these guys, I prefer getting my Q info here. But accounts like this are great at spreading information and I haven't seen anything to make me think Clandestine is not on our side.

3
patriotic_legend 3 points ago +3 / -0

I guess that depends if the picture was created by canariesblue. If so, I don't like it, but you are right if both got the picture from and original source that is not either of them, seems fine.

6
patriotic_legend 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, but this wasn't cherry picking part of a dig, it was taking the entire post and reposting as his own. I don't like it, doesn't mean clandestine is not on our side, maybe he just got lazy, but he should own up to it.

2
patriotic_legend 2 points ago +3 / -1

Has to be leftist in elca lutheran, woke. single dad, looks like mom isnt around. but hard to say, not on her dad's facebook.

Hates men, shoots guns with Dad. pics show her dressed as darth vader is shooting. guessing Dad is a star wars nut.

but his FB page isnt too crazy, hard to imagime raising this killer.

https://m.facebook.com/jeff.rupnow/

2
patriotic_legend 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://m.facebook.com/jeff.rupnow/

Dad's FB, can scroll all the way to birth. Belong to ELCA lutheran church, elca is woke.

But I scrolled through, a couple pics with shooter and her dogs and skeet shooting, but nothing to insane.

5
patriotic_legend 5 points ago +6 / -1

yes this is old, why did guy put this up on substack as new, for clicks?

1
patriotic_legend 1 point ago +1 / -0

why would I listen to the rest? Feel free to tell me what I missed, but difficult to take what I posted and have the sentiment change.

4
patriotic_legend 4 points ago +7 / -3

Thanks for the summary, I didn't know anything about Tate's accusations, just that they are sexual in nature. I stopped having trust in Owens when she said some negative shit about Trump in 2022.

  1. Candace Owens said a personal interaction she had with Trump where he was rude to her led her to change how she feels about him.

She says he is too angry and resentful to be a leader and that true leaders can admit they got some stuff wrong. pic.twitter.com/wqau1f1J9b

There is really no human outside of family and close friends that I trust fully. I am skeptical of all.

1
patriotic_legend 1 point ago +1 / -0

I found it lame that he claimed they are careful with names b/c some could be employees or victims. Implying that they have names.

They don't have names, if they did it would be easy to figure out who the employees and who the Johns were.

At best this video was mad to scare the Jonhs. At worst it provides no real info and was made for clicks.

view more: Next ›