Why don't you actually take a look at the voting demographics before posting?
White women, a group sometimes categorized as swing voters and who broke nearly evenly in 2016 (47% for Trump to 45% for Clinton), favored Trump in 2020 (53% to 46%).
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/06/30/behind-bidens-2020-victory/
Also, it doesn't take 2 brain cells to recognize that we have several white, college educated women who are out there fighting for MAGA. Lara Trump, Kari Lake, Sarah Huckabee Saunders, Alina Habba, just to name a few off the top of my head.
If you want to point fingers, why don't you blame all minorities, who overwhelmingly vote democrat across the board, and suggest we take their voting rights away? See how ridiculous that sounds? So GTFO with your DEI mentality. Equality of outcome is not an American value, no matter whose side it's for.
Bless your heart, you must lack the skills to look at statements objectively. I used analogies and hyperbole to point out your illogical and/or ridiculous standpoints. You have even deleted your own initial comment and now it seems you've changed your position and are now in agreement that the carts should be returned after use? I'm not seething, but it seems you are. By the way, there's no shame in being wrong. We all make mistakes from time to time.
The retailer provided the shopping cart solely as a clever way to get you to spend more money in the store.
So shopping carts are a nefarious thing now? Imagine a grocery store without shopping carts...
when you get to your car and YOU load the stuff in there (doing more work for the store)
Lol, isn't it technically your stuff at that point? Do you think someone should also unload the groceries at your house too?
As long as you never leave it in a parking space like an asshole, you aren't infringing on anyone else.
Does that mean you prefer to leave it in the road? What's wrong with using those shopping cart corrals?
Blood bath meanings:
Violent Massacre: In a literal sense, “bathing in blood” refers to a scene of extreme violence, where many people are killed, and the area is soaked in blood, as if it were a bath. This metaphorical expression is often used to describe a massacre, slaughter, or a bloodbath.
Rejuvenation Ritual: In a fictional context, such as Judge Dredd or The Jennifer Morgue, “bathing in blood” is a dark and sinister ritual used for rejuvenation, implying that the practice involves immersing oneself in blood to achieve youth or vitality.
Take your pick. These people are openly satanic and symbolism will be their downfall.
Why do you say that?
They are very old fashioned and that's not always for the better. Women are treated as second class citizens. Where I live, we see this firsthand when a Mennonite/Amish couple have to do business outside of their own society, like officiate a land purchase. If the woman has to be present to sign a document, she stands two paces behind the man and quietly waits to be told what to do by him.
That being said, I'd choose them for neighbors every time over the hordes of illegals that I used to live around in southern California.
Weird, huh? Just another cog in their grand design of dumbing down, ripping off, and otherwise enslaving the world population.
We're not meant to drink baby food from another species
Why not? We eat flesh, eggs, and babies from other species.
Why doesn't Psycho Joe Scarborough play a clip of Trump saying what he claims he said?
How the heck did Melania look that amazing after having newborn Baron?
This is amazing. Thanks for sharing.
I'm giving you an example of a first world country that does not have a legal code to support 2 separate law systems and yet it still exists. Muslims just go to these courts instead of going through the UK legal system. I'm sure you can only imagine the exploitation of women going on in these Muslim courts. Do you think if the UK banned Sharia Law, these underground courts would still exist? America understandably does not want to make the same mistake the UK has made by not addressing this issue before it starts becoming one. If it happened there, why is it so unreasonable to think it could happen here?
That sounds good in theory, but people coming from these Latin countries predominantly vote for more socialism. The free gibs are more important to them than their Catholic principals. If you don't believe me, you can look up the demographic data for yourself.
The need to make money to be able to eat and pay rent is a great motivator. End all subsidies and after the subsequent chimp outs subsided, I bet we'd find plenty of people willing to work again (or for the first time).
Article 1, Section 7 of the United States Constitution: "...If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law."
Why are Sundays excepted if the founders didn't want to make this a Christian nation? Pagans don't have a sabbath day, neither do Muslims, and the Jews' sabbath is on Saturday. Boom.
In all seriousness though, we have to give Christianity credit for turning the barbaric pagans of Europe into the great nations of western civilization. Individualism, rationalism, virtue, equality for all. These ideals originate from Ancient Rome, but were adopted and revived by Christianized Europe and unlike Ancient Rome formed a culture that instilled importance on chivalry and morality. All the freedoms we enjoy today are because of Christian principles, not from the teachings of Thor, Ganesh or Allah. I think Jefferson and Madison probably detested Muslims because of the Barbary Pirates that would enslave American merchants. After meeting an ambassador from Tripoli to stop the unwarranted attacks on American merchant ships, Thomas Jefferson wrote:
It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise...
That was written in the 1700's. Doesn't seem like too much has changed in the last 200+ years for the mussulman, actually really since Islam's inception in the 7th century. Some cultures are better than others and I think it's important to address the reasons why, even if it offends some.
I see now, thanks!
I'm sure that your research skills are adequate enough to find information on Deism among the Founding Fathers.
So I looked up Deism and this is the definition from Wikipedia: Deism is the philosophical position and rationalistic theology[5] that generally rejects revelation as a source of divine knowledge and asserts that empirical reason and observation of the natural world are exclusively logical, reliable, and sufficient to determine the existence of a Supreme Being as the creator of the universe.[11] More simply stated, Deism is the belief in the existence of God—often, but not necessarily, an impersonal and incomprehensible God who does not intervene in the universe after creating it,[8][12] solely based on rational thought without any reliance on revealed religions or religious authority.[13] Deism emphasizes the concept of natural theology—that is, God's existence is revealed through nature.[14]
So I think you are trying to make the argument that the founders are not Christian and did not intend for this country to be founded on Christian values? According to this definition, Deism is a philosophy, not a religion. Why can't the founders be both Christian and Deist (aka view the bible from a rational/logical viewpoint)?
The Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence use words like "Divine Providence" and "Creator" and you believe they were referring to a non-denominational, catch all type God? Not to mention the subsequent states constitutions that were formed thereafter. 44 out of 50 of them use words like the "Almighty God", etc.
But the biggest question I would have for you is if religion or Christianity meant so little to the founders, why did they even mention God at all in their works?
Need to put the mugshot in there too! Trump's the master at marketing.
I would not say Hammurabi's code written in the time of ancient Babylon was something the founders aspired for their constitution. Sure it was a set of written rules which was revolutionary for the time, but these rules were not fair at all by our standards. For example, if a doctor accidentally killed his patient during an operation the doctor would lose his hand. Not to mention there were different standards of justice for different classes of people.
Go look at how many of our Founding Fathers were Theists.
Lol, I think you mean Deists. And that narrative reeks of Marxist propaganda to me. Can you prove they were Deists by citing from some of your 'many religious texts' that you are so well versed in?
In the UK they are not supposed to have separate laws for separate people either. But there are Sharia extrajudicial courts. The UK is unsure of how many exist within their country. They believe that there may be 85 such councils operating independently from the legal system. Muslims will go to these councils to settle familial disputes rather than the UK court system. Naturally, those of us across the pond are concerned about this sort of thing happening over here. Today the UK's Muslim population makes up 6% of their total population, but these courts started forming the the 80's when it was under 1%.
If Muslims want Sharia law as their governing authority, we Americans do not want them in this country. It is antithetical to our constitution and everything that makes us American.
I typed in The Bible and Bill of Rights into Brave and a nice AI generated answer popped up:
The Bible has had a profound impact on the development of Western philosophy, politics, and law, including the United States Bill of Rights. While the Bill of Rights is a secular document, its principles and concepts are rooted in biblical values and ideas. Here are some key connections and influences:
Natural Law: The Bible teaches that God has endowed humans with inherent rights and dignity (Genesis 1:26-27, Psalm 8:4-5). This concept of natural law is echoed in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, which recognize the inherent rights of individuals, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Separation of Powers: The biblical concept of triune Godhead (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) influenced the separation of powers in the Constitution, with its three branches of government (legislative, executive, and judicial).
Protection of Individual Rights: The Bible emphasizes the importance of protecting the weak and vulnerable (Exodus 22:22-24, Psalm 82:3-4). This concern for individual rights is reflected in the Bill of Rights, which guarantees protections against government abuse and ensures the rights of all citizens, regardless of social status or position.
Limited Government: The Bible teaches that government derives its authority from God (Romans 13:1-7) and should be limited in its power and scope (Deuteronomy 16:18-20). This idea of limited government is central to the American system, as embodied in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Inalienable Rights: The Bible speaks of rights that cannot be taken away, such as the right to worship God (Deuteronomy 10:12-13) and the right to life (Genesis 9:5-6). The Bill of Rights recognizes similar inalienable rights, including freedom of religion and the right to life, liberty, and property.
Influence of Christian Thinkers: Many Christian thinkers, such as John Locke, Thomas Aquinas, and James Madison, drew heavily from biblical principles and ideas when developing their political theories. These thinkers’ works, in turn, influenced the drafting of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
And inalienable rights are supposed to apply to everyone, even non-Christians. So in a nutshell, that's what it means when you read or hear someone say the USA is a Christian nation. Not to mention the first pilgrims came over to practice Christianity away from the established deep state and the American holiday Thanksgiving is a Christian holiday. Like the whole reason why all our ancestors came over and made this place what it was, was for Christian freedom.
No and we want to keep it that way. There should not be two sets of rules for two sets of people. For example in India, there are religion-specific civil codes that separately govern adherents of different religions. There are separate codes of law for Muslims, Christians, and Hindus that deal with divorce, inheritance, and other civil matters. You may think this is fair, but it is very antithetical to western viewpoints to impose separate sets of laws on people living in the same country.
Yes, the capital is so far away from people in the southern part of the state. I lived the first 20 years of my life in socal and never set foot in the capital because it was 8 hours away. Those corrupt politicians live in their own little world, comfily away from most of their constituents.
Raise winners. Homeschool your kids.