Interesting.

I'd like to PM you for more information, if you're agreeable. To no particular end in mind - I'm just interested.

May I ask: do you operate from within a private firm? And, if so, is it a boutique? Or more along the lines of an AMLAW100?

My rapid assessment -

(1) I have a depth of thought about this and other relating topics, and that depth of thought is too long for a comment. I'll have to post a companion piece - perhaps with your teamwork, POA. Let's talk about that.

(2) Are we being herded? They're trying like hell. That's for sure. But they're frantic that it's not working. The more they try, the more glaring their distortions become, and the more people rebel.

(3) As you said, probably more important than an AI that greets us at every digital corner to "educate" us, is the simple deletion of information. The attempt to distort bedrock informational content. This is insidious.

(4) Our payment system - OH.... I have a lot to say about that. Sit tight. ...But, yes, it has been infiltrated. And it's just beginning.

GREAT WORK, POA. Thanks for this!

By chance, did you read "A Departure and a Preface?"

https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6cDeVUY/the-simon-lectures--a-departure-/

This gives some hints. Only hints, though. :-)

Thank you, Meme.

This is not easy to write. And it's that much harder, when confronted with the possibility that absolutely no one will find it to their liking. Thanks for sticking it out with me. And you're totally correct in my goal here: I'm trying to lead people to observe the nature of their thought process, and later to characterize it a bit.

You're a smart man. Thanks for reading.

In all seriousness, I am concerned that this Series is too abstract and doesn't contain an immediate "payoff." It's not easy to write, and it can't be easy to read. Thanks for hanging in there. One more Part before it starts to come to its first "point" - in Series III - that most here will appreciate.

You know your Greek. And your cattle. You are a man of great breadth! And wit!

:-)

Thank you, kind sir.

I know this Series is abstract and difficult. It serves a purpose. Soon.

As always, I'm humbled that anyone reads this. Thank you.

It's definitely not for everyone!

For those of you who are interested, Part 2 of Series II is just now released.

It is here: https://greatawakening.win/p/16aA97Pst1/

I know this Series II is difficult. Please hang in there. One more Part, and then I will begin Series III - which I suspect most of you will find appealing, to say the least.

Thank you, as always.

u/bubble_bursts

I have to say, I don't usually look for coded messages. But this isn't really even coded - it's blatant. It's bold. And it does seem to indicate that someone thinks the end is near.

Wow.

This is the most important thing going on in America and, probably, the world.

Don't know how I missed this.

May I suggest daily re-stickying this until history has run its course?

u/bubble_bursts

I'll need to give this some time. It's not the sort of thing that I can take in, in just five or ten minutes - which is a good thing! Thanks for sending it my way.

Thank you for reading, Glory.

My current plan is to produce Parts 2 and 3 of Series II, next. Then to produce Part 1 of Series III - which I suspect many here will find engrossing. Then to circle back to Series I with a Part 9. And, then, to return to Series III with a Part 2 et seq.

But my mind could be changed, if people here want something else.

(I am debating a Series IV... But I think I've got my hands full building out the troika I've already promised.)

I think this Series II will - from the point of view of topicality - prove the most challenging to the readership here, just from the point of view of interest. Although I thought no one would have enthusiasm for Series I. So that shows what I know.

Oh. And, as always, thanks for reading. I am humbled. And readers make the act of writing that much more enjoyable.

I have never had the honor of encountering "smart" as a verb. If that's your innovation, please know I appreciated it and think it's the sort of cleverness that top-notch humor is made of.

May I ask: were you able to follow this? I worried about the C = log(1/Q) thing. I thought that might turn readers off.

Thanks for your trust, btw. I am starting at a remote location here, and I don't assume that anyone would see why I'm writing about any of this here. Doesn't seem related to Q - at first.

This makes sense unquestionably and motivates me to advance this Series further. We'll see how the rest react! :-)

Again, thank you for reading. I'm humbled.

I am humbled that you read this, Logic. I know it is difficult and not as casually enjoyable as Series I - which, itself, is somewhat demanding. It's about economics, after all.

Also, I appreciate the trust you place in me. I promise all of this goes somewhere and comes together. Series I, II, and III each, independently, go somewhere, and in their final state, they come together.

Your patience, trust and readership is much appreciated.

You hint toward a topic coming much later, POA. (If I may take such liberty as to abbreviate your name.)

I am uncertain exactly how far I intend to advance this Series on this site. Certainly many more Parts. But, I fear that this particular Series will be viewed as the one that the readership here has to "put up with" in order to get to the "good" Series. That said, I may venture into an exploration of another topic you hint at (different from the one I referred to initially). Specifically, the interface between science and metaphysics, and where modern scientific enterprise trespasses upon metaphysical lands.

Thank you for reading, POA. I am always surprised anyone cares what I have to say. Especially when the material is demanding, as is this material.

"We will have to take away some of your cyber-freedom. To protect you. Because 93% of us believe you're in danger. Trust us. It's for your own good."

Didn't realize it had been down. Was that today? ...Today was busy for me.

For those of you who are interested, I have posted Series II, Part 1 of the Simon Lectures. Here: https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9lhEbrc/

Part I is not concluded with its 8 current Parts. I simply felt my thoughts to be sufficiently elaborated that I would start "building out" other Series which deal with other topics.

I think that, were that to occur, said new party would find itself with more numerous support than either existing party. ...Only if Donald were to be its first presidential candidate.

Now, we'd need to fix the voting system here. But that's a different story.

I don't generally listen to X22 - so I couldn't comment on the value of the podcast as a whole. That said, I do try to listen to Lara when I become aware that she has spoken on a matter. So I listened to this while at the gym today. It's worthwhile. Give it a listen.

Lara addressed the whole of our situation. All of its various fronts - or at least a numerous plurality of them. So it's hard to distill her message rapidly in summary form. In that sense, it is the opposite of my Lectures Series, wherein each Series focuses on a single front and proceeds linearly. Those can be distilled. She is addresses more of the whole.

Anyhow, many thanks to u/Pollycracker. Great listen.