It's a COIN operation, that's for sure...
For anyone curious what that means, Q linked to this several times:
https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/119629.pdf
The population-centric approach shifts the focus of COIN from defeating the insurgent organization to maintaining or recovering the support of the population. While direct military action against the insurgent organization will definitely be required, it is not the main effort; this approach assumes that the center of gravity is the government’s relationship with and support among the population. It can be summarized as “first protect and support the population, and all else will follow.”
Q, as an operation, has already been successful.
If it still fails, then the battle was unwinnable from the start. There's nothing anyone could have done or will be able to do going forward. This is why trusting the plan is important. It's less about a guarantee, than it is about a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If we collectively believe it will work, then people will be so invested that they cannot ignore the movement. We all keep coming back here despite all that happens. What does that tell you?
It means we still have hope. If we didn't have hope, we'd already be in Civil War 2.0.
That's not something White Hats should want.
Where terrorist groups are present, policy makers may be highly motivated to engage, in order to prevent the emergence of transnational threats from under-governed or insurgent-controlled areas. However, large-scale or clumsy intervention in such areas may actually lead to a backlash from local people who are alienated by increased government presence.
Encouraging militia groups to take out the "terror cells" like ANTIFA and BLM could create a backlash as they rally to confront us. In the ensuing chaos, a coup could form and make it impossible to re-draw the lines of civil order.
We can't be hasty, specifically because they own the Propaganda outlets -- the Media.
Propaganda is a key element of persuasion and is used at the local, national and often international levels to influence perceptions of potential supporters, opinion leaders, and opponents in the favor of the insurgents; promoting the insurgent cause and diminishing the government’s resolve. More specifically, propaganda may be designed to control community action, discredit government action, provoke overreaction by security forces, or exacerbate sectarian tension.
We would GUARANTEE lose a Civil War if it came to popularity. Why? Because the only way around that would be not to take up arms against the Government but instead target the Main Stream Media Propaganda apparatus. That includes Social Media.
Unless we take those down, we'd lose public sentiment...
If you haven't noticed, NO ONE here is talking about taking the fight to the Main Stream Media when they talk about a Civil War, despite how many times Trump and Q tell us they are the "Enemy of the People."
Civil War 2.0, as openly kinetic warfare, would be a disaster for Patriots...
One side would welcome in the UN "Peacekeepers" and that would be that.
If you want that plan to work, then get busy convincing people to start dragging news anchors out by their neck ties and stringing them up. As it stands, while I'm sure everyone would like to, I've seen a complete ignorance on this particular topic.
Most of the people here, and on PDW have no idea that taking up arms against the Government and their ANTIFA, BLM stooges is a game-winning move for the enemy. They have successfully convinced us to target these hostile groups rather than the word-spinners in the Main Stream Media. If you really want a Civil War 2.0 to work, we'd have to clear out the MSM in a week. Every local and national news site, network, and personality needs to be taken out simultaneously.
Every celebrity, athlete, musician, streamer, content creator, etc. will have to be exterminated...
I don't see that happening...
Cooks = Internet Influencers
Chefs = Celebrities, and News Personalities
I'm just waiting for people to double down on the "islam is right about women" and change it to "islam is right about jews"
Maybe I should make that meme sign?
I'm not arguing against Web3.
You misunderstand my jaded point of view.
They only back something they can use. They only allow things they can control.
I have every reason to believe that Web3 is more of the same. A trojan horse. The horse itself isn't bad. It's the fuckers waiting inside to slit our throats that's the problem.
If the garbage bin is too big, they can't sort through it all.
It's even safer for your crimes if you encoded everything using alternate terms.
Look back to the chat log.
What IS a "memo"?
If the context is False Flags?
Think MK Ultra...
"Memo", short for "Memorandum"?
Or "Memory"?
Gaming chats can be shut down, the records tossed, and investigations into the vaporware go nowhere. It's the cleanest route to shut things down if they go south as well as the best excuse to have a chat feature that millions of messages get sent on organically. It's good cover.
More than that, as you can see by their usage of words, they can hide their conversation using the game's items and terms as analogues.
Take WoW for example. Goblins are obviously based on Jews. Orcs based on black people. Polymorph turns people and things into sheep. You can set up a role-play scenario to practice business deals.
What seems to onlookers to be a fun little role play session is in actuality a perfect stand in for business arrangements. Spells cast, items traded, gold transferred -- all stand ins for bigger deals going on over our heads.
It's a place to meet. A place to plot. All draped in a fantasy world so that cops and investigators get lost in the jargon.
Instead of mafia types meeting under piers and in parking garages, they moved them to the internet -- in video games. It's great for them, because these games don't even have borders in most cases. You don't have to risk actually showing up to a meeting and a bust come and get you. "It's all safe and secure."
You're not thinking evil enough.
Think cryptography.
You can register an encrypted image or other digital asset. On the face it looks like an image of a monkey or a pdf of a turkey recipe. In reality, if you plug it into the right decryption algorithm you can hide any sort of material in it. Only the person with the key to unlock it can do so.
Or, at the very least, you can plop in some instructions. Or a contract.
Slave contracts? Drug trade agreements? Insider trading take sheets?
NFT's are poised to be new stand ins for big money transfers. Just like how Hunter Biden laundered money through his cheap art pieces. They're just mirrors and analogues for bigger deals at the very least. NFT's, however, offer a method for the art itself to be the value traded.
Why do it this way, you may ask?
So it's all manageable in plain sight, but masked from prying eyes. So you don't have to crawl in the shadows to do "business." Even the police and authorities can't track it. With so many potential NFT blockchains capable at running, how could they possibly crack down on it without sabotaging the market as a whole?
You see, if you are gonna do some really crooked shit you gotta tack it on to an "essential" property. Graft your illegal scheme onto something people rely on and people will ignore your crimes because they refuse to sacrifice a "good thing."
In reality, it was all rigged from the start. That's the logic behind the phrase "too big to fail."
Hospitals are responsible for more illicit deaths than famine and street violence combined. They harvest organs, put you on treatment plans that make you sicker, and force you to leverage your house to pay medical bills. It's a parasite on society. But because they're the ones who give us band-aids when we scrape our knee, obviously we have to overlook their fraud and murder because the whole system is "too big to fail."
NFT, Bitcoin, etc... On paper they aren't a problem. In practice, however, you can tack a good amount of illicit activity upon them. Once they get "too big to fail" then you've locked into society a permanent host upon which you can lay any parasite of your choosing.
Because of Alaska's rigged ranked choice system. It's actually a miracle Tshibaka made it this far, let alone in the lead. Hence my confidence so long as Alaskan voters don't cuck out.
Well, there's a runoff, but Tshibaka (Trump's endorsement) eeked out a 2% lead over her. It's a win, and with only 71% votes reporting, and them slow rolling everything, Tshibaka looks like the winner so long as the same people go out to vote for her.
I'm gonna freak if the bridesmaid dresses are Tiffany Blue.
No, it's very unlikely...
But let's just say he is still alive.
Is that why "we don't say his name"?
https://qalerts.app/?q=we+don%27t+say+his+name
Because doing so might jeopardize some ongoing investigations and risk some NDA's being blown wide open?
It's worth the ponder, however unlikely.
Yeah, perhaps I jumped the gun.
At least this post draws attention to WHY she has to go...
Tshibaka came out ahead, even if it's just 2%.
That, and they are slow-rolling the results. With what we're seeing elsewhere, when they slow-roll it's because they don't wanna show just how bad the anti-Trump person did.
Runoff or no, depending on what we will see next week in Arizona, Murkowski's chances are slim to none in the run-off.
Their goal has always been to drain him of money and tie up his lawyers.
It's a win, but not unexpected.
Every day that passes I'm reassured Trump will not be the first arrest.
As things are shaking out, I figure it's gonna be someone already thought to be dead.
I'm not a betting man, so let's ponder on it being John McCain for a bit...
I'm in a bad mood.
I'm probably not gonna be nice this time of year going forward.
Some things can't be replaced... Let's leave it at that.
We all need a refresher:
https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/119629.pdf
The population-centric approach shifts the focus of COIN from defeating the insurgent organization to maintaining or recovering the support of the population. While direct military action against the insurgent organization will definitely be required, it is not the main effort; this approach assumes that the center of gravity is the government’s relationship with and support among the population. It can be summarized as “first protect and support the population, and all else will follow.”
If this fails, then Military will step in.
Transparency and Accountability IS "The Only Way"
And if that fails, then Military.
Reconcile:
Don't be fooled. This is a trap.
Elon offers the $8 tag and now they have to "show us" how that's a bad thing.
I feel like this is all orchestrated to force Elon to walk back the measure. Hell, I'm not even ruling out that Elon was in on it from the start, just to get our hopes up.
The implications are too stupid to consider this all happened coincidentally...
One last mention...
When you read these, to get the full understanding you gotta think like an evil motherfucker.
Taking this back to NFTs...
Think. Like. An. Evil. Mother. Fucker.
Child Porn + NFTs...
Put the pieces together. Think long and hard about it.
It makes me fucking sick...
Reread that conversation. They plot their False Flag events on the game chats prior.
They close down the chat channel during the operation so no one fucks with the timeline. Once the "memo" is sent, then they have to adhere strictly to the exact same game plan -- what was last said in the chat logs.
This is how they coordinate MSM coverage for the 4:00am talking points. Think back to Uvalde. Think back to how all the MSM outlets aligned to a strict timeline, a strict understanding of the events, and most importantly a strict narrative to push down our throats.
It all begins on the game chat channels. Using coded language. I stress to you, read through that conversation. It's one of many examples...
It's not just False Flags. They also do the same with big drug pushes like at the border. Different games are different Mirrors, different "realms" of illicit trade. Why did Soros shove millions into Activision-Blizzard?
https://nichegamer.com/billionaire-george-soros-invests-45-million-into-activision-blizzard/
Back channels. White Hats took down too many of their back channels, and Soros needed to add some for his "Summer of Love" shenanigans. Who organized the brick drops? Where did they plan everything?
Why is Bobby Kotick the most paid CEO in US business?
https://www.pcgamer.com/investment-group-says-activision-ceo-bobby-kotick-gets-paid-too-much/
It goes so much deeper. Like I said, politics, sex, and drugs are all tied into what we know as "gaming" chats and forums.
All this in mind, it makes you think twice when a country bans a game service, aye?
GamerGate meant so much more than just journalists selling out for game coverage. It led to PizzaGate. It led to Comet PingPong.
We're here, with this knowledge, because they got sloppy in the gaming realm...
The well goes deep, for those willing to dive...
Here's more context:
Kind of like how people didn't understand what the internet was 30 years ago. Or how to use a computer, or anything, basically.
Unfortunately, they still don't know what the internet is...
Half of everyone in my same age bracket (25-35) doesn't know how to copy and paste, let alone what to do when the internet router goes out...
They're so woefully clueless on average that it depresses me some days... I'm the only one at work that can troubleshoot a printer. Hell, I'm the only one who even knows what "troubleshoot" is and what it means.
If you want a set-in-stone moment that NFT's will "go the distance" it will be as soon as people stop falling for Indian tech-support scams. That's my bar, and I'm sticking to it.
When that day comes, then I'm sure NFT's will be a household name. Until then, they're gonna stay as they are, about as relevant as a fidget spinner.
Have you looked into how much money people have spent on in-game items? Web3 gaming is the future.
That's part of the bubble.
In-game items and DLC is putting a strain on the viability of the market. It's short-term gains at the compromise of long-term investment schemes being phased out of the market completely.
When long-term schemes die, then everything becomes a service industry. When something becomes a service industry, it's only downhill.
In this case, short-term gain is the Free-to-Play market with sickeningly large amounts of DLC and in-game items.
Long-term gain is structured around putting out classic titles and the merchandise that can go along with it. If you make a game, and skimp on the merchandise, then you're doing it wrong. Even a little model on someone's shelf grafts a sense of loyalty onto the customer to continue to buy your products, even if you shove out a lack-luster one every now and then. They are a fan, and they want more of what you're cooking.
If it's the same game in a Free-to-Play market, that sense of loyalty is only lodged in the Sunk-Cost-Fallacy. Once a player decides to cut the strings on their "investment" into a Free-to-Play game, that's it. They're not coming back to a dinosaur, even if it means they "lost" $10,000+ dollars. World of Warcraft is a good indication of that, even though it's not Free-to-Play. People aren't coming back to that turd.
On that note, take a look at Blizzard and Diablo Immortal. They sold out to the free-to-play market. They will string along the same IP as long as they can, then collapse the company and scuttle the profits to their investors. It's not designed to carry on indefinitely. It's designed to suck as much money out of people and then cut it the second they go into the red and not a moment later.
They think that's sustainable... It's really sad.
Gambling isn't sustainable, and they've basically set up a casino with the Free-to-Play market. Put in money, lights go off, and you get a prize. Then you realize the cost of that in-game trinket is more than the physical version, like the Overwatch 2 nonsense going on right now with keychains.
My point is, the entire gaming market is no longer about the player and providing a quality experience. It's about flashy lights, psychologically raping your fan base, and then tossing them to the curb when the hole you've pounded in them is too broke and gaping to keep the investors hard.
Listen in to their quarterly conference meetings. Not a single one of those bigwigs understands what makes games fun. They're all about a sacred "pipeline" that they cannot define. It's just a back and forth of buzzwords that would make any legitimate games developer roll their eyes.
The market I described is doomed to fail.
Web3 gaming looks like an escape from that system, but it isn't. They think they can trick people into "owning" digital items. Look at the state of NFTs. The average joe does not understand it. No matter how many dude-bros try to shove pictures of monkeys down peoples' throats, it's just not sticking.
Trying to describe Web3 gaming to the marketing-degree dumbasses is like trying to explain the function of a litterbox to a dog. No matter how much you drill it in, their shit is still gonna miss the sand.
I'm not happy about that either, mind you. It's just a reality of our current generation. Maybe in 20 years time I could say Web3 is gonna be the bee's knees, but right now we got an unbearable "hello fellow kids" going on in all game investment schemes. All these old fogles and jocks understand is gambling, and that's what they've turned it into.
All that and more...
It's also tied into the political, sex and drug trades. That's what Q clued us into...
I'm gonna be blunt with this. It's so complicated and intertwined with crypto and Wallstreet that I've kept it general for the sake of my own sanity.
Gamestop is to Gaming as the Scholastic Book Fair is to Reading.
You go in, and you quickly realize that 90% of the stuff you would actually buy are the trinkets, tats, puzzles, and toys.
The games and books are superfluous to the business that touts them.
Which means one thing, and one thing only -- they aren't selling what they claim they are selling...
Schools still allow the Scholastic Book Fairs into schools because they claim it will get kids reading. In reality, they know the "book" fair selling toys at school will give them a kickback of the proceeds.
The books are only there as a placeholder and to dupe parents into thinking the fair is about education. It's not. It's about profit.
Gamestop ran a buy-back racket where they'd buy back games and basically turn into a rental store. It was at odds with game developers putting DRM and codes on games. Developers won that fight, which is what led Gamestop to being a glorified game-themed knick-knack outlet.
Where we are now is Gamestop being the most openly shorted company in existence. Everyone knows they don't sell games when Steam and online console marketplaces exist. Day-1 updates to play a game killed brick-and-mortar.
Just like the Scholastic Book Fair, Gamestop is nothing more than a racket to extort profits by duping dumbasses who think it's still a solvent business.
WHEN Gamestop fails, it will fail because it has hit a wall -- a wall that is building in the video game market. A wall not dissimilar to the wall of the original video game market crash of the NES era. Mark my words, ET the video game will have its own Montezuma's revenge. The Entertainment Industry is tacked onto the popularity of "geek" culture. None will survive the onslaught when this particular bubble bursts.
Except, perhaps, eastern entertainment like anime, manga, and k-pop music...
There is too much market saturation in game development. Too many developers, too little profit, too many games flooding the market, and not enough quality assurance. There's too many indie games, that there's no way you will ever be able to play all of them, even if you toss the bad ones.
In reality, there's no need for new games to be developed. That's a stark reality many will not admit. Just like movies, every story in games has already been told... All that's left is to regurgitate the same old crap mechanics (cough cough, ubisoft, cough cough) or push out endless sequels while your lead developer commits suicide from his state of creative bankruptcy...
That's what I see with Gamestop... It's a bubble waiting to burst, and everything -- EVERYTHING in entertainment is gonna go down with it. Good riddance, to be honest. It's time we get back to crafts and hobbies to fill our free time. That's so much more productive, and lucrative if you play it right.
Games are a service industry. They do not produce anything of multiplicative value, they just service the need to be entertained.
Crypto is fine in theory.
But just like everything else, a new market will always have its fair share of scamsters.
I've been saying it for a while, the only thing you have is what you can hold in your hands and defend under your feet. Everything else only has value to those who see it as valuable.
Sure, you can have crypto on a flash drive. Sure you can have a stack of gold coins.
If you can't trade it for it's true value in loaves of bread, it's worth only as much as a paperweight.
No one knows the true value of crypto. Which means, people can easily convince you of it's worth.
More than anything else, if crypto is worth so much, then why are they telling you about it? Any other day of the week, if someone comes up to me and says "you wanna make some easy money?" or "I made money on this, you should too!" it's a scam. But for crypto, everyone's been gung-ho about it.
That should tell you everything you need to know. It's what people aren't talking about yet still buying that has true value. Everything else is leverage.