Until Wednesday I believed the same thing. Wednesday Biden was actually answering questions from reporters and this exchange happened:
A reporter asked President Biden how he reassures allied nations that Trump will not return. “Or, that his political movement, which is still very strong, will not —” he began before Biden interjected.
“Oh, yeah?” Biden laughed.
” — once again take power in the United States?” the reporter finished his question.
“We have to demonstrate he will not take power if he does run, I am making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again.”
I saw this live and on OAN during multiple news segments, but it is very hard to find using standard search engines. I did find it using Freespoke - the one Scavino touts.
This sounds to me to be a threat from Biden to Trump, and it could mean he will be arrested, or DOJ will start harassing him harder, maybe another IRS audit - who knows. It can't be good though.
Exactly. I couldn't find a semi-legitimate news source to post, but I saw it live. Everything i found had massive bias against Biden, like the USSA article that called him Illegitimate Biden. I believe he is, but if I find junk like that in a news article - for either side - I discount it and look for another article.
A few weeks back Merrick Garland reported he would be indicting Trump in 60-90 Days. That time frame would be Jan 5 through Fed 5 in 2023. However, the new 118th Congress is sworn-in, on Jan 3rd, 2023. With the Republican House majority, how will that work out for Garland's indictment agenda timeline? NOT TOO GOOD! https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3710063-gop-bracing-for-trump-indictment-soon-after-election-day/
Their 'indict Trump' agenda seems to be falling apart and so they switch-up the narrative to; 'Dump Trump' narrative with the Republican RINOs.
This new RINO-Republicans vs. Trump America First-MAGA party split will fail as well. Trump supporters are in the mega-millions and gaining every day!
Trump posted on Truth about 'looking to the future.'
America First agenda is moving forward and the recent Q posts strongly suggest the Central Banking debt/slave system will be his focus. That and the still present election fraud Mafia-like cheating system. When Trump begins his rallies for 2024 presidential run, let's listen to his speeches carefully to extract the messaging of election fraud and busting up this debt/slave system. He's got the people behind him!
Not sure why people are celebrating. This means Nov 22nd is now just one more day when Trump isn't unveiling the Dual Screen. More ho-hum chaos life.
Also, I mean, just imagine if after losing 2012, Obama made a speech riling up a crowd, that crowd marched to the Capitol and said they were going to murder people, during which time Obama stayed weirdly silent until it was clear proceedings would not be stopped. Say a Congressional committee was made to investigate what happened - would you really be celebrating Obama dodging the subpoena to answer questions about his role in a mob action that took lives? Do you really want there to be established precedent to allow a different D to pull this same trick sometime in the future?
Trump completely skipping the committee? That's bad television, and that's why y'all should be worried. When Trump makes decisions that make TV less interesting instead of more, something is up.
But... But the subpoena was for the final televised hearing. It was already going to be televised. Like countless hours had been before? I truly don't understand what point you're trying to make.
Not going on at all is bad television. It just straight up is, and that's odd, and thus noteworthy. Maybe it signals that there will be a bigger show happening, due to something announced, perhaps, one week prior? Calling something bad entertainment is not inherently prescribing motive.
Trump offered to testify before the J6 committee only if it was live on TV. Saying that him "getting out of it" when their response was, basically, NO, you'll do it under oath and behind closed doors feels a iffy
Their goal has always been to drain him of money and tie up his lawyers.
It's a win, but not unexpected.
Every day that passes I'm reassured Trump will not be the first arrest.
As things are shaking out, I figure it's gonna be someone already thought to be dead.
I'm not a betting man, so let's ponder on it being John McCain for a bit...
Surely Epstein was the first arrest to "verify action and confirm future direction"?
Edit: Or could it have been Maxwell?
There was a photo in one of the Q drops with 3 people, all of the, arrested by now, 1 dead (Weinstein, Epstein, Maxwell).
Yes indeed. Yes, all arrested. Epstein is supposedly dead, but how do we really know?
Even Weinstein could have been the first arrest.
u/#q4566
Exactly
Until Wednesday I believed the same thing. Wednesday Biden was actually answering questions from reporters and this exchange happened:
A reporter asked President Biden how he reassures allied nations that Trump will not return. “Or, that his political movement, which is still very strong, will not —” he began before Biden interjected.
“Oh, yeah?” Biden laughed.
” — once again take power in the United States?” the reporter finished his question.
“We have to demonstrate he will not take power if he does run, I am making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again.”
I saw this live and on OAN during multiple news segments, but it is very hard to find using standard search engines. I did find it using Freespoke - the one Scavino touts.
This sounds to me to be a threat from Biden to Trump, and it could mean he will be arrested, or DOJ will start harassing him harder, maybe another IRS audit - who knows. It can't be good though.
Biden has no power. Whatever is happening the white hats are mow pulling the strings.
All the laws and EOs trump passed spells out everything that's going on and who is controlling it
This actually sounds similar in vibe to his Nordstream 2 prophetic remarks...
First of all, that isn’t Biden. One day he looks young and coherent, the next day he looks doddering, ancient and lost.
And neither of those are Biden. Below is the real Joe.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-20/biden-portrays-himself-as-pragmatic-bipartisan-as-he-weighs-bid?leadSource=uverify%20wall
We have not seen him in a long time
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/administration/3728174-biden-suggests-trump-will-not-take-power-again-if-he-runs-in-2024/amp/
Is this what you are referring to?
Exactly. I couldn't find a semi-legitimate news source to post, but I saw it live. Everything i found had massive bias against Biden, like the USSA article that called him Illegitimate Biden. I believe he is, but if I find junk like that in a news article - for either side - I discount it and look for another article.
I always thought George Floyd would be a good first arrest. That would be a wake up call!
Me too
Everyone knows McCain is dead though. You saying he is still Live?
No, it's very unlikely...
But let's just say he is still alive.
Is that why "we don't say his name"?
https://qalerts.app/?q=we+don%27t+say+his+name
Because doing so might jeopardize some ongoing investigations and risk some NDA's being blown wide open?
It's worth the ponder, however unlikely.
We don't say his name because he was a traitorous son of a bitch. Also he was called No-Name before he died.
Interesting point about the walking dead.
I don't see Trump being arrested as the mass awakening either. More likely someone like the pope, the king of England, etc.
That’s our Stable Genius
❤GEOTUS🐸
Doubt they ever really expected to get him. Just make it look like he is hiding something.
Why is the committee dissolving? Midterms kick them out?
Some reg or law stating that any investigation has to be temporarily suspended if any of committee member is voted out during an election.
Nice👌
A few weeks back Merrick Garland reported he would be indicting Trump in 60-90 Days. That time frame would be Jan 5 through Fed 5 in 2023. However, the new 118th Congress is sworn-in, on Jan 3rd, 2023. With the Republican House majority, how will that work out for Garland's indictment agenda timeline? NOT TOO GOOD! https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3710063-gop-bracing-for-trump-indictment-soon-after-election-day/
Jim Jordan is the ranking member of the Judiciary committee and he's already at work... https://republicans-judiciary.house.gov/
Their 'indict Trump' agenda seems to be falling apart and so they switch-up the narrative to; 'Dump Trump' narrative with the Republican RINOs.
This new RINO-Republicans vs. Trump America First-MAGA party split will fail as well. Trump supporters are in the mega-millions and gaining every day!
Trump posted on Truth about 'looking to the future.'
America First agenda is moving forward and the recent Q posts strongly suggest the Central Banking debt/slave system will be his focus. That and the still present election fraud Mafia-like cheating system. When Trump begins his rallies for 2024 presidential run, let's listen to his speeches carefully to extract the messaging of election fraud and busting up this debt/slave system. He's got the people behind him!
Let's see how this plays out.
Let's listen carefully to his speech on Nov 15th too!
Now they can issue their report blaming Trump for….whatever they can come up with.
WWG1WGA!
https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/08/politics/january-6-committee-members/
Bennie Thompson (Mississippi) won reelection
Liz Cheney (Wyoming) ousted
Adam Schiff (California) won reelection
Jamie Raskin (Maryland) won reelection
Elaine Luria (Virginia) ousted
Pete Aguilar (California) won reelection
Zoe Lofgren (California) won reelection
Stephanie Murphy (Florida) did not seek reelection
Adam Kinzinger (Illinois) did not seek reelection
5 committee members won reelection. 4 were ousted or did not run again.
"won"... ;)
Mostly in CA!
Can't the Court just refuse to hear it on some BS procedural reason like they used to avoid so many of his election lawsuits?
Would be nice but good guys like to do things the way they are suppose to go & courts generally go slow.
Said in my head in Bill Paxton's voice🐸
We're not going to last 17 hours much less 17 days!
😁👌
REEEEE! IT'S MA'AM!! Lol❤
NEVER, EVER MESS WITH a Man who has BILLIONS and is smarter than all the devils on the 6 Jan committee...FLESH EATING PARASITES!!!
Brilliant move by Trump.
Not sure why people are celebrating. This means Nov 22nd is now just one more day when Trump isn't unveiling the Dual Screen. More ho-hum chaos life.
Also, I mean, just imagine if after losing 2012, Obama made a speech riling up a crowd, that crowd marched to the Capitol and said they were going to murder people, during which time Obama stayed weirdly silent until it was clear proceedings would not be stopped. Say a Congressional committee was made to investigate what happened - would you really be celebrating Obama dodging the subpoena to answer questions about his role in a mob action that took lives? Do you really want there to be established precedent to allow a different D to pull this same trick sometime in the future?
Trump completely skipping the committee? That's bad television, and that's why y'all should be worried. When Trump makes decisions that make TV less interesting instead of more, something is up.
Bad television? You mean like the way the J6 committee refused Trump's offer to testify on the condition that it be televised live for all to see?
Be more of a glowie loser, seriously
But... But the subpoena was for the final televised hearing. It was already going to be televised. Like countless hours had been before? I truly don't understand what point you're trying to make.
Not going on at all is bad television. It just straight up is, and that's odd, and thus noteworthy. Maybe it signals that there will be a bigger show happening, due to something announced, perhaps, one week prior? Calling something bad entertainment is not inherently prescribing motive.
Trump offered to testify before the J6 committee only if it was live on TV. Saying that him "getting out of it" when their response was, basically, NO, you'll do it under oath and behind closed doors feels a iffy
But, no. The subpoena was for a televised hearing. I'm sorry, but it just was. For a specific time and date that was to be televised.
That’s awesome!
I was kind of hoping he would go before them and ridicule them to their faces.